|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-10 | 39-33 | 148-157 | 0-0 | 23-28 | 83-106 | 6-17 | 43-44 | 206-264 | | in all lined games | 8-10 | 39-33 | 148-157 | 0-0 | 23-28 | 83-106 | 3-15 | 32-40 | 113-193 | | as an underdog | 7-8 | 17-25 | 90-112 | 0-0 | 10-15 | 52-68 | 2-13 | 9-33 | 41-161 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 3-4 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 11-14 | | in road games | 4-5 | 17-20 | 74-80 | 0-0 | 10-16 | 40-55 | 1-10 | 14-28 | 57-162 | | in road lined games | 4-5 | 17-20 | 74-80 | 0-0 | 10-16 | 40-55 | 1-8 | 12-25 | 38-117 | | against conference opponents | 7-5 | 30-23 | 122-114 | 0-0 | 19-22 | 66-87 | 3-9 | 26-27 | 120-171 | | in February games | 2-2 | 8-11 | 49-44 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 26-34 | 0-4 | 7-12 | 52-67 | | after a conference game | 6-6 | 28-23 | 111-110 | 0-0 | 17-21 | 60-83 | 3-9 | 27-26 | 126-164 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 6-2 | 16-8 | 67-50 | 0-0 | 9-7 | 32-45 | 3-5 | 15-10 | 61-63 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 4-1 | 5-1 | 20-22 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 9-17 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 29-41 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 5-5 | 25-11 | 69-55 | 0-0 | 9-15 | 34-46 | 4-9 | 28-15 | 114-90 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 3-3 | 14-7 | 48-34 | 0-0 | 4-11 | 18-35 | 2-4 | 14-7 | 58-42 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-9 | 32-37 | 154-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 10-15 | 37-52 | 253-234 | | in all lined games | 11-9 | 32-37 | 154-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 7-14 | 25-46 | 156-179 | | as a favorite | 4-1 | 12-10 | 75-78 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 46-47 | 5-1 | 16-7 | 109-47 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-1 | 4-4 | 21-19 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 13-11 | 1-1 | 5-3 | 28-13 | | in all home games | 5-6 | 16-16 | 70-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 7-8 | 28-19 | 172-68 | | in home lined games | 5-6 | 16-16 | 70-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 5-7 | 18-15 | 95-50 | | against conference opponents | 6-5 | 23-25 | 109-125 | 0-0 | 19-18 | 79-81 | 5-7 | 22-28 | 155-140 | | in February games | 3-0 | 8-10 | 38-54 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 33-30 | 2-2 | 7-13 | 55-62 | | after a conference game | 5-5 | 18-27 | 97-119 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 75-74 | 5-7 | 18-32 | 148-145 | | off a win against a conference rival | 2-2 | 8-12 | 50-70 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 42-40 | 1-3 | 10-11 | 61-64 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 2-1 | 4-5 | 33-40 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 23-21 | 1-2 | 6-9 | 55-52 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 7-3 | 17-17 | 69-67 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 40-52 | 9-4 | 25-22 | 131-75 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 3-2 | 9-14 | 46-46 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 31-37 | 3-3 | 9-16 | 66-48 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-1 | 6-1 | 16-16 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 8-18 | 2-2 | 6-2 | 26-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 4-2 | 8-3 | 25-23 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-21 | 5-4 | 10-6 | 44-21 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 6-17 | -8.8 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 63.0 | 29.3 | 42.3% | 32.0 | 70.2 | 33.0 | 46.0% | 33.9 | | Road Games | 1-10 | -2.8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 55.2 | 25.5 | 37.3% | 31.6 | 69.0 | 34.2 | 44.0% | 36.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.7 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 70.2 | 34.6 | 46.6% | 31.0 | 76.4 | 33.2 | 53.1% | 30.6 | | Conference Games | 3-9 | -4.8 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 66.0 | 30.6 | 45.0% | 31.6 | 72.0 | 32.6 | 46.9% | 32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.0 | 29.3 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 67.6% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.7 | 24-54 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 55.2 | 25.5 | 19-50 | 37.3% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 12-18 | 65.3% | 32 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.2 | 33.0 | 26-56 | 46.0% | 6-16 | 38.0% | 13-18 | 71.3% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.8 | 30.5 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.0 | 34.2 | 24-56 | 44.0% | 6-16 | 36.8% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 10-15 | -3.8 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 68.6 | 31.5 | 41.2% | 38.0 | 71.4 | 34.6 | 44.8% | 33.7 | | Home Games | 7-8 | -1.8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 72.0 | 32.5 | 41.8% | 39.9 | 71.2 | 34.4 | 44.9% | 32.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 69.0 | 31.6 | 44.3% | 35.4 | 68.4 | 36.4 | 44.5% | 31.4 | | Conference Games | 5-7 | -1.1 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 69.7 | 31.1 | 41.2% | 36.5 | 75.6 | 38.4 | 46.9% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.6 | 31.5 | 24-58 | 41.2% | 5-18 | 29.4% | 16-24 | 66.2% | 38 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 15-21 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.0 | 32.5 | 25-60 | 41.8% | 5-18 | 24.5% | 17-26 | 65.0% | 40 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.4 | 34.6 | 25-56 | 44.8% | 9-24 | 35.3% | 13-18 | 70.5% | 34 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.2 | 34.4 | 24-54 | 44.9% | 9-24 | 35.7% | 14-18 | 74.3% | 32 | 7 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: FURMAN 67, UT-CHATTANOOGA 66.6 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| FURMAN is 14-6 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | FURMAN is 14-12 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | 8 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| FURMAN is 3-1 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | FURMAN is 3-1 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| FURMAN is 6-3 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 8-4 straight up against FURMAN since 1997 | | 4 of 6 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 against the spread versus FURMAN over the last 3 seasons | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 straight up against FURMAN over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/23/2012 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 55 | 137.5 | Under | 26 | 17-54 | 31.5% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 33 | 8 | 12 | | | FURMAN | 65 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 16-29 | 55.2% | 43 | 13 | 12 | 3/5/2011 | FURMAN | 61 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 18-42 | 42.9% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 37 | 9 | 22 | | N | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 52 | 135.5 | Under | 24 | 16-51 | 31.4% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 15-29 | 51.7% | 32 | 11 | 16 | 2/21/2011 | FURMAN | 59 | -3.5 | Under | 26 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 7-32 | 21.9% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 26 | 5 | 10 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 75 | 139 | SU ATS | 38 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 21-31 | 67.7% | 39 | 7 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FURMAN games 52.2% of the time since 1997. (130-119) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FURMAN games 56.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (35-27) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 55% of the time since 1997. (142-116) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 56.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-23) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 02/14/2013 - Charlie Reddick expected to miss Thursday vs. Tennessee Chat ( Leg ) | | [G/F] 11/28/2012 - Dominic Early out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 11/28/2012 - Jordan Loyd out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|