|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| JACKSONVILLE ST | -1 | | | TENNESSEE TECH | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-9 | 38-27 | 120-104 | 0-0 | 25-24 | 100-88 | 15-7 | 36-50 | 188-265 | | in all lined games | 8-9 | 38-27 | 120-104 | 0-0 | 25-24 | 99-88 | 10-7 | 25-41 | 76-156 | | as a favorite | 5-6 | 12-15 | 35-37 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 28-29 | 9-2 | 17-10 | 47-28 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less or pick | 0-0 | 1-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 5-2 | | in road games | 5-2 | 24-8 | 72-44 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 53-45 | 5-4 | 11-29 | 55-166 | | in road lined games | 5-2 | 24-8 | 72-44 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 53-45 | 3-4 | 8-24 | 23-96 | | against conference opponents | 6-5 | 26-20 | 94-78 | 0-0 | 20-16 | 78-70 | 7-4 | 19-28 | 107-175 | | in February games | 1-0 | 14-3 | 41-26 | 0-0 | 10-6 | 34-28 | 1-0 | 8-9 | 54-66 | | on Saturday games | 5-3 | 14-12 | 46-39 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 40-35 | 7-3 | 17-15 | 76-95 | | when playing with 5 or 6 days rest | 1-0 | 4-1 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-8 | 2-0 | 3-4 | 12-20 | | after a conference game | 5-5 | 24-17 | 87-74 | 0-0 | 18-14 | 74-68 | 7-4 | 21-26 | 111-170 | | off a win against a conference rival | 4-2 | 11-6 | 34-24 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 27-19 | 4-2 | 9-9 | 26-37 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 2-3 | 17-7 | 30-19 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 23-16 | 5-3 | 16-15 | 36-48 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 4-3 | 16-13 | 53-51 | 0-0 | 10-12 | 48-44 | 10-0 | 23-17 | 112-105 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 2-1 | 11-5 | 35-29 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 34-27 | 3-0 | 10-6 | 59-53 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 4-2 | 10-15 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 16-7 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 19-22 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 3-1 | 7-6 | 17-24 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 21-13 | 5-1 | 12-7 | 38-43 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-11 | 34-33 | 160-163 | 0-1 | 24-27 | 104-106 | 8-14 | 47-41 | 260-222 | | in all lined games | 5-11 | 34-33 | 160-163 | 0-1 | 24-27 | 104-106 | 4-12 | 33-35 | 163-170 | | as an underdog | 4-9 | 21-18 | 75-86 | 0-1 | 9-16 | 56-52 | 3-10 | 12-27 | 38-129 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less or pick | 1-1 | 1-1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 4-8 | | in all home games | 2-4 | 7-18 | 63-68 | 0-1 | 7-13 | 35-46 | 5-4 | 25-14 | 165-58 | | in home lined games | 2-4 | 7-18 | 63-68 | 0-1 | 7-13 | 35-46 | 2-4 | 14-11 | 92-42 | | against conference opponents | 2-8 | 23-25 | 121-121 | 0-1 | 20-20 | 79-81 | 2-8 | 26-23 | 167-134 | | in February games | 0-1 | 7-9 | 39-55 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 29-33 | 0-1 | 11-6 | 67-56 | | on Saturday games | 2-6 | 15-15 | 65-64 | 0-0 | 11-11 | 47-38 | 4-7 | 17-19 | 97-85 | | when playing with 5 or 6 days rest | 1-2 | 4-4 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 10-8 | 1-2 | 2-6 | 11-20 | | after a conference game | 2-7 | 23-23 | 115-116 | 0-1 | 18-20 | 80-78 | 2-7 | 26-23 | 170-130 | | revenging a blowout loss vs opponent of 20 points or more | 0-2 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 8-1 | 0-2 | 0-4 | 3-17 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 0-2 | 4-7 | 35-33 | 0-1 | 3-7 | 24-26 | 0-2 | 6-6 | 51-43 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-5 | 9-11 | 48-47 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 29-36 | 2-5 | 13-9 | 54-47 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 4-2 | 8-6 | 26-17 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 12-11 | 3-3 | 11-6 | 37-31 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 1-6 | 14-15 | 66-80 | 0-1 | 8-15 | 46-45 | 0-7 | 10-23 | 74-121 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 0-3 | 11-11 | 41-51 | 0-1 | 7-13 | 31-33 | 0-3 | 9-13 | 47-62 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-1 | 10-7 | 20-18 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 15-18 | 1-1 | 6-11 | 14-26 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 2-6 | 12-12 | 37-35 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 27-25 | 1-8 | 7-18 | 25-59 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 15-7 | +3.9 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 65.3 | 28.4 | 43.8% | 29.4 | 61.9 | 27.2 | 43.9% | 34.0 | | Road Games | 7-4 | +3 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 58.5 | 23.1 | 40.7% | 27.3 | 59.0 | 26.5 | 44.4% | 32.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 67.6 | 30.2 | 47.1% | 26.2 | 67.2 | 28.4 | 48.8% | 34.0 | | Conference Games | 7-4 | +1.9 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 67.3 | 29.7 | 46.7% | 27.1 | 64.4 | 27.9 | 45.8% | 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.3 | 28.4 | 22-51 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 16-23 | 67.3% | 29 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.6 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 15-21 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 58.5 | 23.1 | 20-48 | 40.7% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 14-21 | 68.9% | 27 | 8 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.9 | 27.2 | 22-51 | 43.9% | 4-13 | 27.5% | 13-19 | 71.2% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.2 | 30.3 | 24-55 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 59.0 | 26.5 | 21-48 | 44.4% | 4-12 | 30.1% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 17 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-14 | -6 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 63.2 | 29.8 | 41.4% | 33.8 | 67.1 | 33.5 | 43.4% | 33.5 | | Home Games | 5-4 | -2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 66.4 | 34.1 | 43.6% | 33.7 | 58.9 | 30.9 | 40.2% | 31.8 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 57.6 | 28.0 | 35.6% | 35.6 | 66.2 | 29.4 | 42.5% | 36.4 | | Conference Games | 2-8 | -5.2 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 59.9 | 28.6 | 37.0% | 34.3 | 70.0 | 33.6 | 47.1% | 34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.2 | 29.8 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 31.4% | 12-17 | 67.7% | 34 | 11 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.7 | 32 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.4 | 34.1 | 24-54 | 43.6% | 8-22 | 35.0% | 12-17 | 70.5% | 34 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.1 | 33.5 | 22-51 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 17-24 | 71.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.4 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 70.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.9 | 30.9 | 20-49 | 40.2% | 5-17 | 31.8% | 14-21 | 69.9% | 32 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 6 | 18 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: JACKSONVILLE ST 65.3, TENNESSEE TECH 68.4 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| JACKSONVILLE ST is 12-7 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | TENNESSEE TECH is 11-10 straight up against JACKSONVILLE ST since 1997 | | 9 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| JACKSONVILLE ST is 3-2 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH over the last 3 seasons | | TENNESSEE TECH is 3-2 straight up against JACKSONVILLE ST over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| JACKSONVILLE ST is 6-3 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | TENNESSEE TECH is 6-4 straight up against JACKSONVILLE ST since 1997 | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| JACKSONVILLE ST is 2-0 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH over the last 3 seasons | | TENNESSEE TECH is 1-1 straight up against JACKSONVILLE ST over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 62 | | | 28 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 13-22 | 59.1% | 40 | 17 | 16 | | | JACKSONVILLE ST | 83 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 2/4/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 76 | -2 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-51 | 58.8% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 31 | 8 | 15 | | | JACKSONVILLE ST | 68 | 134.5 | Over | 29 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 29 | 11 | 14 | 1/19/2012 | JACKSONVILLE ST | 63 | 131 | SU ATS | 37 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 24 | 6 | 14 | | | TENNESSEE TECH | 62 | -9 | Under | 29 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 37 | 13 | 13 | 2/26/2011 | JACKSONVILLE ST | 75 | 133 | ATS | 35 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 28 | 9 | 8 | | | TENNESSEE TECH | 77 | -6.5 | SU Over | 32 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 16-26 | 61.5% | 41 | 11 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in JACKSONVILLE ST games 44.8% of the time since 1997. (81-100) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in JACKSONVILLE ST games 46.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (24-28) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TENNESSEE TECH games 45.7% of the time since 1997. (117-139) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TENNESSEE TECH games 45.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (26-31) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 02/02/2013 - Matt Marseille "?" Saturday vs. Jacksonville St ( Knee ) | | [G] 01/05/2013 - DeOndre Haynes expected to redshirt ( Foot ) |
|
|