|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| MINNESOTA | -13 |  | | USC | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 6-2 | 36-37 | 205-221 | 2-1 | 33-34 | 142-147 | 9-1 | 49-30 | 274-218 | | in all lined games | 6-2 | 36-37 | 205-221 | 2-1 | 33-34 | 142-147 | 7-1 | 44-30 | 218-216 | | as a favorite | 5-1 | 19-24 | 99-101 | 1-1 | 16-22 | 67-65 | 6-0 | 32-12 | 153-51 | | as a road favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 3-0 | | in road games | 1-0 | 13-10 | 69-87 | 1-0 | 11-12 | 50-53 | 1-0 | 10-13 | 46-113 | | in road lined games | 1-0 | 13-10 | 69-87 | 1-0 | 11-12 | 50-53 | 1-0 | 10-13 | 46-113 | | in December games | 1-0 | 5-9 | 35-34 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 22-21 | 2-0 | 12-3 | 82-22 | | on Saturday games | 0-1 | 5-6 | 64-58 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 31-48 | 2-0 | 9-3 | 90-58 | | after a non-conference game | 6-2 | 19-16 | 75-81 | 2-1 | 15-14 | 55-44 | 9-1 | 34-6 | 153-59 | | in non-conference games | 6-2 | 20-14 | 78-74 | 2-1 | 13-15 | 51-46 | 9-1 | 36-4 | 161-52 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 2-1 | 5-6 | 43-40 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 27-15 | 3-0 | 9-3 | 63-38 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 2-0 | 6-3 | 40-41 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 28-24 | 3-0 | 11-0 | 82-24 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 2-4 | 26-41 | 220-224 | 4-2 | 27-39 | 144-159 | 3-5 | 28-46 | 253-225 | | in all lined games | 2-4 | 26-41 | 220-224 | 4-2 | 27-39 | 144-159 | 2-5 | 25-46 | 231-222 | | as an underdog | 0-2 | 12-22 | 109-94 | 3-0 | 15-20 | 72-79 | 0-3 | 5-30 | 61-144 | | as a home underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 1-9 | | in all home games | 1-1 | 10-20 | 94-112 | 1-0 | 10-18 | 68-66 | 2-1 | 18-18 | 153-80 | | in home lined games | 1-1 | 10-20 | 94-112 | 1-0 | 10-18 | 68-66 | 1-1 | 15-18 | 135-78 | | in December games | 0-1 | 5-8 | 45-46 | 1-1 | 4-11 | 20-34 | 0-2 | 6-10 | 71-38 | | on Saturday games | 0-0 | 7-15 | 84-79 | 0-0 | 7-15 | 53-54 | 0-0 | 7-16 | 93-77 | | after a non-conference game | 2-4 | 15-16 | 80-81 | 4-2 | 11-17 | 38-59 | 2-5 | 14-20 | 120-68 | | in non-conference games | 2-4 | 14-16 | 76-84 | 4-2 | 11-16 | 37-58 | 3-5 | 16-19 | 121-68 | | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 0-0 | 4-6 | 22-22 | 1-0 | 6-6 | 14-13 | 0-1 | 3-9 | 19-28 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-0 | 4-11 | 29-27 | 1-0 | 10-6 | 21-14 | 0-1 | 3-14 | 20-38 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-4 | 20-26 | 154-146 | 4-2 | 18-28 | 109-113 | 2-5 | 16-33 | 143-173 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 1-3 | 12-15 | 57-65 | 3-2 | 10-19 | 38-56 | 1-4 | 8-21 | 48-79 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 0-2 | 5-5 | 64-52 | 2-0 | 4-7 | 47-41 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 51-72 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-1 | +3.4 | 6-2 | 2-1 | 77.1 | 39.6 | 47.9% | 40.4 | 61.0 | 27.6 | 36.1% | 31.8 | | Road Games | 3-1 | +2.4 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 74.5 | 37.5 | 45.4% | 34.7 | 73.7 | 34.7 | 43.0% | 33.2 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +3.4 | 3-1 | 2-0 | 80.4 | 40.4 | 48.9% | 38.0 | 65.8 | 30.0 | 38.4% | 32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.1 | 39.6 | 27-56 | 47.9% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 19-26 | 72.1% | 40 | 14 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 15 | 8 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 31 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-19 | 71.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.5 | 37.5 | 23-52 | 45.4% | 4-13 | 32.1% | 23-30 | 76.9% | 35 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.0 | 27.6 | 21-57 | 36.1% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 14-20 | 71.2% | 32 | 12 | 11 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 33.1 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 15-21 | 73.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.7 | 34.7 | 25-59 | 43.0% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 17-23 | 75.0% | 33 | 13 | 11 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-5 | -3.6 | 2-4 | 4-2 | 64.2 | 28.7 | 41.5% | 33.2 | 67.5 | 35.9 | 43.1% | 34.0 | | Home Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 69.7 | 30.7 | 41.5% | 40.7 | 61.0 | 29.7 | 35.6% | 31.7 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 60.2 | 27.0 | 39.1% | 33.4 | 65.8 | 35.2 | 44.8% | 34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 64.2 | 28.7 | 23-57 | 41.5% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 12-18 | 70.2% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.1 | 28.8 | 23-56 | 40.1% | 6-20 | 32.7% | 12-18 | 67.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.7 | 30.7 | 25-61 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 41 | 13 | 15 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.5 | 35.9 | 23-52 | 43.1% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 34 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.6 | 24-56 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 68.0% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.0 | 29.7 | 18-50 | 35.6% | 8-20 | 37.7% | 18-25 | 71.1% | 32 | 6 | 6 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 1 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 77.5, USC 77.5 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| MINNESOTA is 1-0 against the spread versus USC since 1997 | | MINNESOTA is 1-0 straight up against USC since 1997 | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 1-0 against the spread versus USC over the last 3 seasons | | MINNESOTA is 1-0 straight up against USC over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
| |
| There were no past matchups in this series during this time period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/3/2011 | USC | 40 | 119 | Under | 16 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 24 | 8 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 55 | -8 | SU ATS | 28 | 20-41 | 48.8% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 9-9 | 100.0% | 34 | 5 | 18 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 51.8% of the time since 1997. (170-158) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 47.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (29-32) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in USC games 45.9% of the time since 1997. (163-192) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in USC games 44.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (26-33) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|