|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| SAN FRANCISCO | | | | ST MARYS-CA | -15 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-5 | 43-27 | 195-207 | 2-1 | 34-24 | 107-112 | 7-9 | 46-38 | 227-243 | | in all lined games | 7-5 | 43-27 | 195-207 | 2-1 | 34-24 | 107-112 | 4-8 | 36-35 | 182-232 | | as an underdog | 3-4 | 25-14 | 111-114 | 2-1 | 18-17 | 63-75 | 0-7 | 11-29 | 56-176 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 to 15 points | 0-0 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-15 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 3-3 | 20-23 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 8-22 | 0-0 | 0-7 | 1-46 | | in road games | 1-2 | 13-10 | 92-90 | 0-1 | 9-12 | 42-58 | 1-3 | 11-17 | 69-135 | | in road lined games | 1-2 | 13-10 | 92-90 | 0-1 | 9-12 | 42-58 | 0-3 | 9-15 | 62-128 | | against conference opponents | 2-1 | 27-12 | 126-108 | 0-1 | 22-15 | 61-68 | 0-3 | 21-18 | 112-128 | | in January games | 2-1 | 14-4 | 55-58 | 0-1 | 9-7 | 21-38 | 0-3 | 12-8 | 58-65 | | on Saturday games | 2-3 | 17-14 | 84-86 | 1-0 | 16-11 | 49-43 | 2-4 | 20-16 | 99-95 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 2-0 | 16-8 | 64-69 | 1-0 | 16-6 | 41-38 | 1-1 | 14-11 | 71-84 | | after a conference game | 1-1 | 26-11 | 123-106 | 0-0 | 21-13 | 61-62 | 0-2 | 23-16 | 115-124 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 1-1 | 10-5 | 53-59 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 29-32 | 0-2 | 11-5 | 58-58 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 2-1 | 3-2 | 28-21 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 12-20 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 29-31 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-2 | 27-15 | 103-119 | 2-1 | 19-17 | 58-67 | 4-6 | 17-28 | 78-167 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 0-0 | 15-5 | 59-60 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 32-36 | 0-0 | 9-11 | 38-83 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 4-2 | 25-20 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 11-18 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 12-34 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 3-0 | 7-4 | 38-41 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 22-29 | 0-3 | 1-11 | 25-62 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-7 | 33-37 | 208-209 | 3-2 | 30-32 | 115-122 | 12-4 | 65-19 | 280-203 | | in all lined games | 7-7 | 33-37 | 208-209 | 3-2 | 30-32 | 115-122 | 10-4 | 52-19 | 231-193 | | as a favorite | 6-7 | 28-31 | 129-110 | 2-2 | 27-24 | 85-87 | 10-3 | 49-11 | 190-54 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 to 15 points | 2-0 | 4-1 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 5-10 | 2-0 | 4-1 | 18-3 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 3-3 | 8-14 | 28-31 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 19-29 | 6-0 | 21-1 | 57-4 | | in all home games | 3-4 | 14-18 | 89-96 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 57-46 | 9-0 | 41-4 | 168-62 | | in home lined games | 3-4 | 14-18 | 89-96 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 57-46 | 7-0 | 28-4 | 127-60 | | against conference opponents | 1-1 | 15-20 | 112-124 | 1-0 | 18-17 | 61-71 | 1-1 | 29-7 | 132-109 | | in January games | 1-1 | 8-10 | 53-64 | 1-0 | 8-9 | 27-36 | 1-1 | 15-3 | 65-56 | | on Saturday games | 1-1 | 11-10 | 73-78 | 0-0 | 10-9 | 39-43 | 3-0 | 18-5 | 93-72 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 0-3 | 13-9 | 76-58 | 1-2 | 11-11 | 43-44 | 1-2 | 22-6 | 99-61 | | after a conference game | 1-0 | 12-22 | 106-123 | 1-0 | 17-18 | 64-66 | 0-1 | 25-10 | 129-111 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-0 | 2-4 | 45-51 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 19-14 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 44-54 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 1-0 | 4-1 | 33-32 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 11-13 | 1-0 | 5-0 | 42-34 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 2-2 | 7-13 | 75-68 | 1-0 | 8-9 | 32-48 | 5-0 | 28-1 | 126-47 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 0-0 | 3-8 | 44-42 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 21-35 | 0-0 | 10-1 | 65-25 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-9 | -5.2 | 7-5 | 2-1 | 70.0 | 34.3 | 45.8% | 34.6 | 68.1 | 32.3 | 43.6% | 33.5 | | Road Games | 2-6 | -5 | 3-4 | 2-1 | 63.9 | 31.4 | 43.8% | 31.4 | 67.6 | 30.9 | 45.7% | 32.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.2 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 74.2 | 36.8 | 48.7% | 34.8 | 69.8 | 36.0 | 44.1% | 32.4 | | Conference Games | 0-3 | -4.2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 70.3 | 35.3 | 47.6% | 31.3 | 74.7 | 40.7 | 44.8% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.0 | 34.3 | 25-54 | 45.8% | 7-18 | 39.2% | 13-20 | 64.2% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.8 | 30.8 | 23-56 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.9 | 31.4 | 23-53 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 10-15 | 65.8% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.1 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 43.6% | 7-20 | 37.0% | 12-18 | 65.9% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 31.8 | 24-57 | 42.8% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 13-19 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.6 | 30.9 | 25-54 | 45.7% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 11-17 | 66.2% | 32 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-4 | -5.8 | 7-7 | 3-2 | 79.2 | 35.8 | 49.8% | 37.1 | 66.7 | 30.4 | 42.3% | 27.7 | | Home Games | 9-0 | +1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 84.9 | 38.2 | 51.6% | 39.6 | 63.0 | 29.1 | 40.6% | 26.6 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 76.4 | 31.4 | 47.9% | 38.6 | 66.8 | 33.4 | 44.3% | 27.0 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 76.0 | 30.5 | 47.8% | 36.5 | 72.0 | 38.0 | 47.9% | 26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.2 | 35.8 | 28-55 | 49.8% | 8-21 | 39.4% | 16-21 | 75.7% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.9 | 38.2 | 30-58 | 51.6% | 9-20 | 42.3% | 17-21 | 77.2% | 40 | 12 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.7 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-16 | 38.7% | 14-19 | 74.2% | 28 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 14-20 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.0 | 29.1 | 23-56 | 40.6% | 7-18 | 41.0% | 10-14 | 71.5% | 27 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SAN FRANCISCO 69.2, ST MARYS-CA 69.3 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| ST MARYS-CA is 17-14 against the spread versus SAN FRANCISCO since 1997 | | ST MARYS-CA is 21-11 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO since 1997 | | 10 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN FRANCISCO is 3-2 against the spread versus ST MARYS-CA over the last 3 seasons | | ST MARYS-CA is 5-0 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| SAN FRANCISCO is 8-6 against the spread versus ST MARYS-CA since 1997 | | ST MARYS-CA is 10-5 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO since 1997 | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN FRANCISCO is 2-0 against the spread versus ST MARYS-CA over the last 3 seasons | | ST MARYS-CA is 2-0 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/3/2012 | SAN FRANCISCO | 78 | 142.5 | ATS | 38 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 21 | 3 | 7 | | N | ST MARYS-CA | 83 | -8 | SU Over | 34 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 30 | 8 | 10 | 2/25/2012 | ST MARYS-CA | 67 | -4 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-46 | 52.2% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 40 | 7 | 14 | | | SAN FRANCISCO | 60 | 146.5 | Under | 37 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 26 | 7 | 4 | 1/9/2012 | SAN FRANCISCO | 72 | 142.5 | ATS | 33 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 24 | 9 | 10 | | | ST MARYS-CA | 87 | -16 | SU Over | 45 | 33-49 | 67.3% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 31 | 8 | 17 | 2/12/2011 | ST MARYS-CA | 86 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 29 | 4 | 14 | | | SAN FRANCISCO | 68 | 140.5 | Over | 34 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 32 | 10 | 14 | 1/13/2011 | SAN FRANCISCO | 57 | 139 | ATS | 29 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 33 | 7 | 15 | | | ST MARYS-CA | 71 | -21.5 | SU Under | 35 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 33 | 11 | 10 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN FRANCISCO games 53% of the time since 1997. (174-154) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN FRANCISCO games 52.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (31-28) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ST MARYS-CA games 52.4% of the time since 1997. (182-165) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ST MARYS-CA games 57.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (35-26) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 12/08/2012 - Paul McCoy out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [F] 11/02/2012 - Tim Williams out indefinitely ( Leg ) |
|
|
Free Android App
