|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-13 | 31-44 | 186-184 | 1-2 | 23-36 | 114-121 | 6-19 | 33-54 | 289-213 | | in all lined games | 8-13 | 31-44 | 186-184 | 1-2 | 23-36 | 114-121 | 5-16 | 29-48 | 200-179 | | as an underdog | 7-12 | 26-27 | 98-87 | 1-2 | 14-23 | 57-53 | 3-16 | 14-39 | 55-131 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 to 15 points | 1-3 | 2-3 | 8-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 6-2 | 0-4 | 0-5 | 1-13 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 1-3 | 3-3 | 14-8 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 10-4 | 0-4 | 0-6 | 1-21 | | in road games | 3-7 | 15-20 | 91-71 | 0-2 | 8-19 | 52-50 | 2-10 | 9-30 | 92-117 | | in road lined games | 3-7 | 15-20 | 91-71 | 0-2 | 8-19 | 52-50 | 1-9 | 7-28 | 64-99 | | against conference opponents | 6-8 | 20-33 | 123-129 | 1-1 | 16-26 | 73-88 | 4-10 | 22-32 | 200-122 | | in February games | 2-2 | 8-12 | 47-47 | 1-1 | 7-11 | 31-32 | 1-3 | 7-13 | 73-49 | | after a conference game | 6-7 | 19-29 | 117-126 | 1-1 | 17-22 | 79-81 | 4-10 | 24-29 | 195-126 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 2-2 | 2-6 | 24-20 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 12-15 | 1-3 | 3-8 | 25-29 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 4-5 | 12-15 | 47-48 | 0-1 | 4-16 | 19-37 | 2-7 | 12-17 | 50-49 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 4-5 | 7-8 | 19-23 | 0-1 | 0-8 | 6-15 | 2-8 | 6-12 | 20-30 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 3-8 | 17-20 | 90-88 | 0-2 | 9-20 | 57-57 | 2-11 | 14-28 | 107-121 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-4 | 8-11 | 54-49 | 0-1 | 4-10 | 39-35 | 1-5 | 6-13 | 64-60 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-1 | 3-4 | 9-11 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 10-8 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 11-9 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 2-2 | 6-8 | 25-28 | 1-1 | 5-7 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 5-9 | 31-33 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 3-2 | 3-11 | 15-22 | 1-0 | 5-5 | 12-16 | 3-2 | 8-6 | 34-8 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 4-3 | 5-15 | 26-35 | 1-0 | 7-7 | 20-25 | 3-5 | 9-13 | 59-22 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-12 | 39-41 | 173-176 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 15-11 | 62-34 | 253-230 | | in all lined games | 10-12 | 39-41 | 173-176 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 14-11 | 51-34 | 184-179 | | as a favorite | 7-7 | 29-30 | 91-90 | 0-0 | 18-29 | 57-60 | 11-4 | 44-18 | 134-56 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 to 15 points | 2-0 | 2-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 11-0 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 2-0 | 5-2 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 2-0 | 8-0 | 19-0 | | in all home games | 5-4 | 18-16 | 68-79 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 5-4 | 31-11 | 126-80 | | in home lined games | 5-4 | 18-16 | 68-79 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 5-4 | 24-11 | 88-62 | | against conference opponents | 6-8 | 28-26 | 129-114 | 2-0 | 18-26 | 81-78 | 7-7 | 38-18 | 174-137 | | in February games | 3-1 | 12-8 | 55-40 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 28-35 | 3-1 | 15-6 | 73-54 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 1-3 | 7-13 | 44-58 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 35-29 | 3-3 | 14-12 | 69-77 | | after a conference game | 6-7 | 27-25 | 120-115 | 2-0 | 20-22 | 81-74 | 7-6 | 37-18 | 166-144 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-4 | 7-10 | 45-47 | 2-0 | 4-9 | 33-28 | 2-4 | 10-7 | 52-45 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 3-2 | 10-10 | 39-40 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 31-23 | 5-2 | 14-11 | 48-53 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 5-6 | 17-17 | 81-67 | 0-0 | 6-17 | 39-48 | 8-5 | 32-10 | 144-64 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 3-2 | 10-10 | 47-34 | 0-0 | 5-10 | 22-29 | 4-1 | 17-3 | 71-31 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 4-2 | 9-8 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 12-13 | 5-1 | 15-3 | 36-6 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 5-3 | 11-11 | 29-31 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 21-20 | 7-1 | 21-5 | 65-17 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 6-19 | -4.6 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 59.2 | 29.2 | 39.4% | 34.2 | 67.4 | 32.3 | 42.3% | 35.0 | | Road Games | 3-11 | -4 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 59.0 | 29.7 | 38.8% | 35.1 | 69.8 | 34.6 | 44.1% | 34.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 62.4 | 32.4 | 41.7% | 34.6 | 67.4 | 29.8 | 40.8% | 32.8 | | Conference Games | 4-10 | +0.3 | 6-8 | 1-1 | 59.9 | 29.9 | 39.8% | 33.2 | 68.6 | 32.4 | 43.0% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 59.2 | 29.2 | 20-51 | 39.4% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 31.3 | 23-54 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.0 | 29.7 | 20-52 | 38.8% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 12-18 | 68.1% | 35 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 16 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.4 | 32.3 | 25-58 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 32.4% | 12-16 | 72.1% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.8 | 31.2 | 23-55 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.8 | 34.6 | 26-58 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 12-16 | 74.6% | 35 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 15-11 | -1.1 | 10-12 | 2-0 | 62.7 | 30.3 | 43.4% | 33.4 | 60.3 | 29.6 | 41.0% | 32.5 | | Home Games | 5-4 | -7.6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 61.2 | 29.4 | 43.4% | 34.0 | 56.1 | 28.4 | 40.2% | 30.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 59.0 | 26.6 | 38.9% | 36.6 | 54.6 | 26.4 | 41.2% | 29.4 | | Conference Games | 7-7 | -7.6 | 6-8 | 2-0 | 62.4 | 30.4 | 42.8% | 35.6 | 58.9 | 29.1 | 40.2% | 31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 62.7 | 30.3 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 11-16 | 67.0% | 33 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 61.2 | 29.4 | 22-51 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 34.2% | 11-17 | 65.4% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.3 | 29.6 | 20-50 | 41.0% | 4-12 | 32.0% | 15-22 | 70.4% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.2 | 31.3 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.1 | 28.4 | 19-47 | 40.2% | 4-11 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.3% | 31 | 7 | 6 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SIENA 67.2, FAIRFIELD 68.9 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| FAIRFIELD is 17-13 against the spread versus SIENA since 1997 | | SIENA is 20-16 straight up against FAIRFIELD since 1997 | | 9 of 18 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| FAIRFIELD is 3-2 against the spread versus SIENA over the last 3 seasons | | FAIRFIELD is 4-1 straight up against SIENA over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| SIENA is 7-5 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD since 1997 | | SIENA is 8-7 straight up against FAIRFIELD since 1997 | | 4 of 8 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| FAIRFIELD is 1-1 against the spread versus SIENA over the last 3 seasons | | FAIRFIELD is 2-0 straight up against SIENA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/4/2013 | FAIRFIELD | 64 | -8 | SU ATS | 27 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-23 | 21.7% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 36 | 12 | 11 | | | SIENA | 54 | | | 25 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 32 | 6 | 13 | 2/5/2012 | SIENA | 56 | 126.5 | ATS | 24 | 18-58 | 31.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 38 | 16 | 16 | | | FAIRFIELD | 64 | -11.5 | SU Under | 37 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 32 | 9 | 16 | 1/6/2012 | FAIRFIELD | 60 | -6.5 | Over | 30 | 20-69 | 29.0% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 33 | 20 | 6 | | | SIENA | 73 | 126.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-41 | 63.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 37 | 4 | 16 | 2/25/2011 | SIENA | 55 | 132 | Under | 28 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 39 | 14 | 17 | | | FAIRFIELD | 68 | -9 | SU ATS | 37 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 44 | 18 | 12 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SIENA games 51.5% of the time since 1997. (155-146) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SIENA games 53.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-29) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 49.3% of the time since 1997. (137-141) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 51.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (35-33) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 02/10/2013 - Brett Bisping "?" Thursday vs. Fairfield ( Illness ) | | [G] 01/27/2013 - Ryan Oliver out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 12/09/2012 - Lionel Gomis left the team ( Personal ) | |
| [F/C] 11/23/2012 - Vincent Van Nes out for season ( Toe ) |
|
|