|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-8 | 39-37 | 204-210 | 1-2 | 26-39 | 111-135 | 9-5 | 41-42 | 222-254 | | in all lined games | 5-8 | 39-37 | 204-210 | 1-2 | 26-39 | 111-135 | 8-5 | 35-42 | 172-249 | | as an underdog | 1-2 | 26-21 | 112-126 | 0-2 | 17-28 | 76-96 | 1-2 | 13-34 | 48-193 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 5-1 | 29-15 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 12-22 | 0-0 | 0-6 | 1-43 | | as a road underdog of 18.5 to 24 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-4 | | in road games | 1-1 | 16-12 | 87-88 | 0-2 | 8-19 | 43-57 | 2-1 | 8-21 | 49-136 | | in road lined games | 1-1 | 16-12 | 87-88 | 0-2 | 8-19 | 43-57 | 1-1 | 7-21 | 41-135 | | against conference opponents | 0-2 | 23-19 | 130-136 | 0-0 | 16-24 | 74-92 | 0-2 | 17-25 | 95-178 | | in January games | 1-2 | 9-9 | 55-62 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 37-29 | 1-2 | 9-9 | 44-78 | | on Saturday games | 1-2 | 6-11 | 71-69 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 33-33 | 2-1 | 7-11 | 68-82 | | after a conference game | 0-1 | 23-17 | 126-135 | 0-0 | 17-22 | 77-86 | 0-1 | 19-22 | 100-172 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-1 | 14-9 | 73-88 | 0-0 | 12-10 | 49-59 | 0-1 | 11-12 | 54-112 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 2-2 | 21-14 | 63-66 | 0-0 | 13-19 | 42-57 | 3-1 | 22-16 | 54-88 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-5 | 29-28 | 139-151 | 0-2 | 21-28 | 88-101 | 6-4 | 22-36 | 105-201 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 6-7 | 36-28 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 24-23 | 0-0 | 4-9 | 16-50 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-5 | 15-21 | 68-67 | 1-2 | 15-15 | 46-46 | 6-3 | 12-24 | 41-99 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 3-0 | 24-18 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 15-19 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 13-32 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 1-1 | 9-4 | 43-42 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 25-35 | 2-1 | 7-7 | 34-59 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-7 | 49-32 | 247-231 | 5-3 | 33-43 | 157-193 | 14-1 | 69-21 | 351-169 | | in all lined games | 8-7 | 49-32 | 247-231 | 5-3 | 33-43 | 157-193 | 14-1 | 63-21 | 317-168 | | as a favorite | 8-7 | 37-26 | 182-173 | 5-3 | 23-34 | 121-143 | 14-1 | 55-10 | 276-84 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 3-3 | 10-9 | 55-52 | 0-0 | 3-10 | 32-40 | 6-0 | 19-1 | 100-9 | | as a home favorite of 18.5 to 24 points | 0-1 | 4-2 | 18-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 10-10 | 1-0 | 6-0 | 31-0 | | in all home games | 3-5 | 22-19 | 117-118 | 1-0 | 15-20 | 78-87 | 8-0 | 43-6 | 220-52 | | in home lined games | 3-5 | 22-19 | 117-118 | 1-0 | 15-20 | 78-87 | 8-0 | 37-6 | 189-51 | | against conference opponents | 1-1 | 27-18 | 151-130 | 0-1 | 19-25 | 94-113 | 2-0 | 30-15 | 180-104 | | in January games | 1-1 | 11-8 | 72-60 | 0-1 | 9-9 | 40-50 | 2-0 | 13-6 | 82-52 | | on Saturday games | 3-3 | 18-11 | 86-93 | 4-0 | 16-13 | 61-73 | 5-1 | 26-8 | 128-67 | | after a conference game | 1-0 | 27-17 | 148-130 | 0-1 | 18-26 | 97-118 | 1-0 | 28-16 | 178-105 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-0 | 20-9 | 94-82 | 0-1 | 14-15 | 67-76 | 1-0 | 17-12 | 113-66 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 5-3 | 27-12 | 91-75 | 4-1 | 23-14 | 72-71 | 8-0 | 37-7 | 117-58 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 5-5 | 32-27 | 177-186 | 5-3 | 23-36 | 128-153 | 9-1 | 41-21 | 219-154 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 4-4 | 19-14 | 81-92 | 4-3 | 10-23 | 56-75 | 7-1 | 20-14 | 94-84 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-0 | 3-2 | 19-19 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 10-16 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 46-6 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-5 | -3.1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 63.9 | 29.2 | 41.6% | 35.4 | 59.9 | 27.9 | 39.0% | 37.0 | | Road Games | 2-1 | +1.5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 59.0 | 25.0 | 38.7% | 34.7 | 57.0 | 26.0 | 40.4% | 35.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 62.0 | 25.4 | 38.9% | 36.4 | 62.6 | 28.0 | 40.3% | 40.8 | | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2.4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 48.5 | 21.5 | 37.8% | 29.0 | 58.0 | 32.0 | 39.0% | 42.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.9 | 29.2 | 22-54 | 41.6% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 13-18 | 69.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 28.8 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 12-17 | 67.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.0 | 25.0 | 21-54 | 38.7% | 6-20 | 27.9% | 11-17 | 68.0% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.9 | 27.9 | 22-57 | 39.0% | 5-19 | 28.6% | 10-15 | 66.3% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.5 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 57.0 | 26.0 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 5-21 | 25.8% | 10-15 | 65.9% | 36 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 14-1 | +5.8 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 78.0 | 35.6 | 45.9% | 38.1 | 57.5 | 26.0 | 39.8% | 33.1 | | Home Games | 8-0 | +2 | 3-5 | 1-0 | 80.7 | 37.6 | 47.9% | 40.0 | 56.4 | 24.5 | 38.8% | 33.2 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 78.0 | 38.0 | 48.6% | 36.2 | 61.4 | 28.4 | 40.0% | 35.8 | | Conference Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 76.5 | 36.5 | 47.3% | 35.0 | 60.0 | 32.5 | 40.0% | 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 35.6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 33.7% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 38 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.7 | 23-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 37.6 | 30-62 | 47.9% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 40 | 14 | 18 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.5 | 26.0 | 20-51 | 39.8% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 12-18 | 64.2% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 20 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.3 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.4 | 24.5 | 20-51 | 38.8% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 10-17 | 61.7% | 33 | 9 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 20 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 71.1, LOUISVILLE 75.3 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| LOUISVILLE is 13-4 against the spread versus S FLORIDA since 1997 | | LOUISVILLE is 14-3 straight up against S FLORIDA since 1997 | | 8 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOUISVILLE is 1-1 against the spread versus S FLORIDA over the last 3 seasons | | LOUISVILLE is 1-1 straight up against S FLORIDA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| LOUISVILLE is 5-4 against the spread versus S FLORIDA since 1997 | | LOUISVILLE is 7-2 straight up against S FLORIDA since 1997 | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| S FLORIDA is 1-0 against the spread versus LOUISVILLE over the last 3 seasons | | S FLORIDA is 1-0 straight up against LOUISVILLE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/29/2012 | S FLORIDA | 58 | 119.5 | SU ATS | 22 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 40 | 10 | 18 | | | LOUISVILLE | 51 | -8.5 | Under | 17 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 29 | 8 | 14 | 1/9/2011 | LOUISVILLE | 86 | -8 | SU ATS | 45 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 35 | 17 | 7 | | | S FLORIDA | 77 | 130.5 | Over | 48 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 38 | 15 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in S FLORIDA games 53.4% of the time since 1997. (180-157) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in S FLORIDA games 46.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-34) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISVILLE games 51% of the time since 1997. (204-196) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISVILLE games 52.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (38-34) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 01/11/2013 - Kore White "?" Saturday vs. Louisville ( Foot ) | | [G] 01/11/2013 - Shaun Noriega "?" Saturday vs. Louisville ( Foot ) | |
| [F] 01/11/2013 - Chane Behanan is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. South Florida ( Ankle ) | | [F] 12/29/2012 - Angel Nunez has transferred ( Undisclosed ) | | [C] 11/09/2012 - Mangok Mathiang out for season ( Eligibility ) | | [G] 11/02/2012 - Mike Marra out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|