|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| THE CITADEL | | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | -5 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-8 | 27-36 | 128-150 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 6-15 | 22-61 | 173-291 | | in all lined games | 7-8 | 27-36 | 128-150 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 4-12 | 14-51 | 74-213 | | as an underdog | 7-8 | 26-33 | 106-119 | 0-0 | 21-21 | 77-77 | 4-12 | 13-48 | 45-186 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-0 | 2-1 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 8-10 | | in road games | 3-5 | 11-21 | 66-74 | 0-0 | 13-11 | 52-40 | 2-8 | 6-33 | 47-155 | | in road lined games | 3-5 | 11-21 | 66-74 | 0-0 | 13-11 | 52-40 | 2-6 | 6-27 | 30-114 | | against conference opponents | 6-5 | 22-27 | 108-119 | 0-0 | 16-21 | 71-79 | 3-8 | 12-37 | 87-196 | | in February games | 1-0 | 8-9 | 41-50 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 28-33 | 1-0 | 4-14 | 38-81 | | after a conference game | 7-3 | 23-22 | 98-109 | 0-0 | 13-19 | 63-73 | 4-7 | 13-36 | 95-187 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 5-2 | 8-8 | 41-30 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 29-22 | 3-5 | 5-14 | 20-76 | | off a win against a conference rival | 2-0 | 7-4 | 34-29 | 0-0 | 2-7 | 18-25 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 32-36 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-13 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 7-8 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 18-36 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-4 | 13-16 | 49-64 | 0-0 | 12-10 | 35-39 | 4-5 | 15-23 | 90-106 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 3-0 | 10-6 | 33-42 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 20-31 | 3-0 | 8-9 | 40-62 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-9 | 30-37 | 152-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 8-14 | 35-51 | 251-233 | | in all lined games | 9-9 | 30-37 | 152-174 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 5-13 | 23-45 | 154-178 | | as a favorite | 3-1 | 11-10 | 74-78 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 46-47 | 3-1 | 14-7 | 107-47 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 0-2 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 17-7 | | in all home games | 3-6 | 14-16 | 68-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 5-7 | 26-18 | 170-67 | | in home lined games | 3-6 | 14-16 | 68-72 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 45-47 | 3-6 | 16-14 | 93-49 | | against conference opponents | 4-5 | 21-25 | 107-125 | 0-0 | 19-18 | 79-81 | 3-6 | 20-27 | 153-139 | | in February games | 1-0 | 6-10 | 36-54 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 33-30 | 0-1 | 5-12 | 53-61 | | after a conference game | 3-5 | 16-27 | 95-119 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 75-74 | 3-6 | 16-31 | 146-144 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-3 | 9-12 | 45-45 | 0-0 | 11-5 | 32-32 | 1-4 | 5-18 | 52-49 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 1-1 | 3-5 | 32-40 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 23-21 | 0-2 | 5-9 | 54-52 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 3-2 | 9-6 | 26-29 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 17-19 | 3-3 | 11-9 | 41-45 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 1-1 | 4-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 17-11 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 1-1 | 7-5 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 11-12 | 2-3 | 8-10 | 27-28 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 6-3 | 16-17 | 68-67 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 40-52 | 7-4 | 23-22 | 129-75 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 2-2 | 8-14 | 45-46 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 31-37 | 1-3 | 7-16 | 64-48 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-1 | 5-1 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 8-18 | 0-2 | 4-2 | 24-12 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 3-2 | 7-3 | 24-23 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-21 | 3-4 | 8-6 | 42-21 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 6-15 | +4 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 63.7 | 28.5 | 44.9% | 30.8 | 72.9 | 34.1 | 45.8% | 33.8 | | Road Games | 2-8 | +5.8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 58.0 | 24.9 | 40.8% | 29.0 | 79.1 | 37.8 | 49.9% | 36.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +7.8 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 68.6 | 29.0 | 50.4% | 29.4 | 67.2 | 32.2 | 42.7% | 34.2 | | Conference Games | 3-8 | +3.8 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 62.6 | 27.5 | 45.3% | 29.3 | 70.4 | 34.2 | 44.6% | 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.7 | 28.5 | 23-50 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 12-18 | 70.9% | 31 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.5 | 32.2 | 24-56 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-19 | 70.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 58.0 | 24.9 | 20-50 | 40.8% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 12-18 | 66.5% | 29 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.9 | 34.1 | 27-58 | 45.8% | 8-22 | 36.8% | 11-16 | 72.9% | 34 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.4 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.1 | 37.8 | 30-60 | 49.9% | 8-21 | 37.4% | 12-17 | 67.8% | 37 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-14 | -4.8 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 68.0 | 31.1 | 40.5% | 38.5 | 71.7 | 34.6 | 44.4% | 34.4 | | Home Games | 5-7 | -2.8 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 71.7 | 31.9 | 40.7% | 41.2 | 71.8 | 34.2 | 44.2% | 33.1 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 71.8 | 30.2 | 38.9% | 40.0 | 79.8 | 40.2 | 45.9% | 37.0 | | Conference Games | 3-6 | -2.1 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 68.6 | 29.9 | 39.4% | 37.1 | 77.9 | 39.6 | 46.5% | 35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.0 | 31.1 | 23-57 | 40.5% | 5-18 | 29.3% | 16-25 | 67.0% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69 | 32.5 | 24-56 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 15-22 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.7 | 31.9 | 24-60 | 40.7% | 4-19 | 23.3% | 19-28 | 66.1% | 41 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 34.6 | 25-57 | 44.4% | 9-25 | 36.3% | 12-17 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 7-20 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.8 | 34.2 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 10-26 | 37.7% | 13-18 | 73.8% | 33 | 7 | 17 | 22 | 8 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: THE CITADEL 67.1, UT-CHATTANOOGA 66.9 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 12-5 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 19-5 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 2-1 against the spread versus THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 2-1 straight up against THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 5-3 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 8-3 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| THE CITADEL is 1-0 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | THE CITADEL is 1-0 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/10/2013 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 70 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 29 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 35 | 15 | 11 | | | THE CITADEL | 65 | | | 28 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 32 | 11 | 14 | 2/18/2012 | THE CITADEL | 48 | 141 | SU ATS | 25 | 18-40 | 45.0% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 2-4 | 50.0% | 31 | 6 | 17 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 46 | -10.5 | Under | 26 | 17-53 | 32.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 29 | 10 | 8 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 44.6% of the time since 1997. (100-124) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 42.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (22-30) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 55.5% of the time since 1997. (142-114) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 58.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-21) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 12/19/2012 - C.J. Bray out for season ( Ankle ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|