|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| LA-MONROE | | | | LOUISIANA TECH | -18 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 0-1 | 23-28 | 79-77 | 0-0 | 27-23 | 70-77 | 0-1 | 10-51 | 177-263 | | in all lined games | 0-1 | 23-28 | 79-77 | 0-0 | 27-23 | 70-77 | 0-1 | 7-45 | 44-115 | | as an underdog | 0-1 | 23-24 | 64-66 | 0-0 | 24-22 | 55-67 | 0-1 | 6-42 | 26-106 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 0-1 | 10-7 | 20-20 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 15-21 | 0-1 | 2-16 | 3-38 | | as a road underdog of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 3-0 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-11 | | in road games | 0-1 | 17-11 | 43-44 | 0-0 | 13-14 | 33-47 | 0-1 | 5-27 | 53-172 | | in road lined games | 0-1 | 17-11 | 43-44 | 0-0 | 13-14 | 33-47 | 0-1 | 4-25 | 14-75 | | against WAC opponents | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-5 | | in November games | 0-1 | 4-5 | 12-15 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 12-9 | 0-1 | 3-12 | 25-53 | | on Saturday games | 0-0 | 12-11 | 35-29 | 0-0 | 13-10 | 26-34 | 0-0 | 6-20 | 81-97 | | when playing with 7 or more days rest | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 7-13 | | after a non-conference game | 0-0 | 9-10 | 24-28 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 25-22 | 0-0 | 4-23 | 56-105 | | in non-conference games | 0-1 | 10-8 | 24-23 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 19-21 | 0-1 | 6-22 | 61-101 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 0-0 | 6-4 | 18-12 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 13-16 | 0-0 | 2-10 | 55-64 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 0-0 | 10-16 | 24-36 | 0-0 | 16-10 | 29-27 | 0-0 | 6-22 | 32-79 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 0-0 | 12-9 | 34-33 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 24-40 | 0-0 | 2-21 | 45-140 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-0 | 4-4 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 10-13 | 0-0 | 0-10 | 17-52 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 4-1 | 30-26 | 194-175 | 0-1 | 25-25 | 101-113 | 4-1 | 33-37 | 240-223 | | in all lined games | 4-1 | 30-26 | 194-175 | 0-1 | 25-25 | 101-113 | 4-1 | 26-32 | 179-201 | | as a favorite | 4-0 | 14-6 | 82-78 | 0-0 | 4-9 | 35-42 | 4-0 | 17-3 | 119-43 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 14-1 | | as a home favorite of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-0 | | in all home games | 1-0 | 11-11 | 71-74 | 0-0 | 6-14 | 38-47 | 1-0 | 19-10 | 138-54 | | in home lined games | 1-0 | 11-11 | 71-74 | 0-0 | 6-14 | 38-47 | 1-0 | 13-10 | 96-53 | | against Sun Belt conference opponents | 2-0 | 3-3 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 10-7 | 2-0 | 5-1 | 13-7 | | in November games | 4-1 | 9-5 | 25-23 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 8-20 | 4-1 | 10-7 | 34-34 | | on Saturday games | 0-0 | 11-12 | 78-73 | 0-0 | 11-14 | 38-48 | 0-0 | 11-18 | 107-85 | | after a non-conference game | 4-0 | 18-10 | 68-59 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 32-41 | 4-0 | 23-14 | 109-91 | | in non-conference games | 4-1 | 16-9 | 66-53 | 0-1 | 10-7 | 30-40 | 4-1 | 23-14 | 112-89 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-0 | 12-5 | 70-54 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 26-34 | 1-0 | 17-3 | 120-54 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 34.5% | 30.0 | 85.0 | 38.0 | 47.1% | 49.0 | | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 34.5% | 30.0 | 85.0 | 38.0 | 47.1% | 49.0 | | Last 5 Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 34.5% | 30.0 | 85.0 | 38.0 | 47.1% | 49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 51.0 | 22.0 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 30 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 0 | | vs opponents surrendering | 60.8 | 27 | 22-53 | 41.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 13-20 | 64.6% | 37 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 2 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 51.0 | 22.0 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 30 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 0 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.0 | 38.0 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 49 | 14 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 7 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.8 | 34 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 65.1% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.0 | 38.0 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 49 | 14 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 67.4 | 33.8 | 38.7% | 36.8 | 59.0 | 26.8 | 37.7% | 38.8 | | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 70.0 | 32.0 | 36.1% | 38.0 | 52.0 | 20.0 | 30.4% | 43.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 67.4 | 33.8 | 38.7% | 36.8 | 59.0 | 26.8 | 37.7% | 38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 67.4 | 33.8 | 22-56 | 38.7% | 7-23 | 31.6% | 17-23 | 72.8% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.4 | 29.9 | 22-55 | 40.4% | 6-21 | 30.6% | 14-19 | 71.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.0 | 32.0 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 22-31 | 71.0% | 38 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 11 | 9 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.0 | 26.8 | 21-55 | 37.7% | 5-14 | 32.4% | 13-20 | 66.7% | 39 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 65.1 | 30.7 | 23-57 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 68.9% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 52.0 | 20.0 | 17-56 | 30.4% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 43 | 10 | 8 | 25 | 6 | 19 | 5 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LA-MONROE 75, LOUISIANA TECH 68 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| LOUISIANA TECH is 2-2 against the spread versus LA-MONROE since 1997 | | LOUISIANA TECH is 4-0 straight up against LA-MONROE since 1997 | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LOUISIANA TECH is 1-1 against the spread versus LA-MONROE over the last 3 seasons | | LOUISIANA TECH is 2-0 straight up against LA-MONROE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| LOUISIANA TECH is 1-1 against the spread versus LA-MONROE since 1997 | | LOUISIANA TECH is 2-0 straight up against LA-MONROE since 1997 | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| LA-MONROE is 1-0 against the spread versus LOUISIANA TECH over the last 3 seasons | | LOUISIANA TECH is 1-0 straight up against LA-MONROE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/3/2011 | LOUISIANA TECH | 73 | 128.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 30 | 11 | 10 | | | LA-MONROE | 71 | -2 | Over | 29 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 40 | 13 | 17 | 12/4/2010 | LA-MONROE | 58 | 130.5 | ATS | 25 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 5-28 | 17.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 38 | 10 | 10 | | | LOUISIANA TECH | 67 | -12 | SU Under | 37 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 37 | 6 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LA-MONROE games 55.6% of the time since 1997. (74-59) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LA-MONROE games 61.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (27-17) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISIANA TECH games 47.4% of the time since 1997. (135-150) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISIANA TECH games 41.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-27) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|