|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| as an underdog of 3.5 to 10 points | 0-0 | 5-2 | 34-31 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 13-53 | | in all games | 5-1 | 16-12 | 111-110 | 4-1 | 13-14 | 42-46 | 5-1 | 11-19 | 55-180 | | against conference opponents | 2-0 | 10-7 | 80-78 | 2-0 | 7-11 | 26-37 | 2-0 | 4-14 | 24-138 | | when playing on a Saturday | 5-1 | 16-12 | 110-108 | 4-1 | 13-14 | 41-46 | 5-1 | 11-19 | 55-177 | | when playing with 6 or less days rest | 4-1 | 14-10 | 97-86 | 3-1 | 12-12 | 38-37 | 4-1 | 9-16 | 45-145 | | after playing a conference game | 1-0 | 8-6 | 71-74 | 1-0 | 7-8 | 26-30 | 1-0 | 3-12 | 31-124 | | in games played on a grass field | 4-1 | 13-12 | 101-104 | 3-1 | 12-12 | 39-43 | 4-1 | 8-19 | 49-170 | | in October games | 1-0 | 7-2 | 42-34 | 1-0 | 2-7 | 14-17 | 1-0 | 3-6 | 18-62 | | off a win against a conference rival | 1-0 | 2-1 | 9-13 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 3-6 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 7-16 | | after 2 or more consecutive straight up wins | 2-0 | 3-2 | 8-10 | 2-0 | 2-3 | 2-6 | 2-0 | 3-2 | 9-9 | | in weeks 5 through 9 | 2-0 | 8-2 | 48-39 | 2-0 | 3-7 | 15-20 | 2-0 | 4-6 | 22-69 | | in all lined games | 5-1 | 16-12 | 111-110 | 4-1 | 13-14 | 42-46 | 5-1 | 10-19 | 48-178 | | as an underdog | 2-1 | 12-10 | 97-89 | 3-0 | 10-13 | 37-40 | 2-1 | 6-17 | 29-161 | | as a road underdog of 7.5 to 10 points | 0-0 | 1-1 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 1-9 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 3-14 | | in road games | 1-1 | 5-6 | 58-51 | 2-0 | 6-6 | 15-28 | 1-1 | 4-8 | 20-92 | | in road lined games | 1-1 | 5-6 | 58-51 | 2-0 | 6-6 | 15-28 | 1-1 | 4-8 | 20-92 | | in a road game where the total is between 49.5 and 56 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-10 | | in a road game where the total is between 52.5 and 56 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 2-5 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 2-5 |
|
|
|
|
| as a favorite of 3.5 to 10 points | 0-3 | 5-7 | 38-21 | 2-1 | 6-6 | 25-24 | 1-2 | 8-4 | 47-12 | | in all games | 1-5 | 15-18 | 131-108 | 3-2 | 12-19 | 78-86 | 3-3 | 25-9 | 190-69 | | against conference opponents | 0-2 | 11-9 | 83-67 | 1-1 | 7-13 | 46-56 | 1-1 | 17-3 | 113-40 | | when playing on a Saturday | 1-4 | 14-13 | 101-87 | 3-1 | 10-14 | 57-55 | 2-3 | 21-6 | 156-50 | | when playing with 6 or less days rest | 1-4 | 11-14 | 88-65 | 3-1 | 10-13 | 50-47 | 2-3 | 19-6 | 127-37 | | after playing a conference game | 0-1 | 10-8 | 74-70 | 0-0 | 6-12 | 46-54 | 1-0 | 16-3 | 108-44 | | in games played on a grass field | 1-5 | 14-17 | 111-86 | 3-2 | 12-16 | 63-76 | 3-3 | 23-8 | 164-51 | | in October games | 0-1 | 5-5 | 34-35 | 1-0 | 6-4 | 22-21 | 0-1 | 8-2 | 54-19 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-0 | 0-1 | 17-18 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 24-15 | | after 2 or more consecutive straight up losses | 0-0 | 1-0 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 10-10 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 0-1 | 7-6 | 67-52 | 1-0 | 5-9 | 49-46 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 73-49 | | in weeks 5 through 9 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 39-40 | 2-0 | 7-4 | 27-22 | 0-2 | 8-3 | 62-22 | | in all lined games | 1-5 | 15-18 | 131-108 | 3-2 | 12-19 | 78-86 | 3-3 | 25-9 | 175-68 | | as a favorite | 1-4 | 15-16 | 103-85 | 2-2 | 11-17 | 58-69 | 3-2 | 25-6 | 157-33 | | as a home favorite of 7.5 to 10 points | 0-1 | 0-3 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 5-4 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 9-2 | | in home games | 1-2 | 7-9 | 60-54 | 0-2 | 4-9 | 28-44 | 3-0 | 14-2 | 108-22 | | in home lined games | 1-2 | 7-9 | 60-54 | 0-2 | 4-9 | 28-44 | 3-0 | 14-2 | 94-21 | | in a home game where the total is between 49.5 and 56 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 13-5 | | in a home game where the total is between 52.5 and 56 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 7-2 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-1 | +2.2 | 5-1 | 4-1 | 37.8 | 18.5 | 414.7 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 25.2 | 14.7 | 372.2 | (5.3) | 2.0 | | Road Games | 1-1 | +0.2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 23.5 | 8.0 | 383.0 | (4.7) | 2.5 | 38.5 | 16.5 | 385.0 | (5.8) | 2.5 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2.2 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 38.0 | 14.7 | 425.0 | (5.6) | 1.7 | 19.3 | 13.7 | 336.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | | Grass Games | 4-1 | +1 | 4-1 | 3-1 | 38.6 | 19.6 | 421.4 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 24.8 | 15.6 | 367.2 | (5.2) | 1.6 | | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.2 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 38.0 | 13.5 | 387.5 | (5.4) | 0.5 | 22.0 | 13.5 | 429.0 | (5.5) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 37.8 | 18.5 | 20.8 | 31:25 | 33-126 | (3.8) | 28-41 | 68.0% | 289 | (7.1) | 74-415 | (5.6) | (11) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.7 | 17.8 | 20.9 | 30:16 | 36-156 | (4.3) | 23-36 | 61.8% | 254 | (7) | 73-410 | (5.6) | (11.8) | | Offense Road Games | 23.5 | 8.0 | 20.0 | 33:11 | 29-75 | (2.5) | 36-51 | 69.9% | 308 | (6) | 81-383 | (4.7) | (16.3) | | Defense (All Games) | 25.2 | 14.7 | 18.2 | 28:35 | 35-130 | (3.7) | 20-36 | 54.8% | 242 | (6.7) | 71-372 | (5.3) | (14.8) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.4 | 11.6 | 17.1 | 31:10 | 37-132 | (3.6) | 18-32 | 57.5% | 224 | (7) | 69-356 | (5.2) | (15.2) | | Defense Road Games | 38.5 | 16.5 | 17.5 | 26:48 | 30-129 | (4.2) | 18-35 | 52.1% | 255 | (7.2) | 66-385 | (5.8) | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-3 | -5.4 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 29.0 | 13.2 | 376.8 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 390.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | | Home Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 33.0 | 16.3 | 380.3 | (5.5) | 0.7 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 258.3 | (3.9) | 1.7 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 31.7 | 16.0 | 397.3 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 25.0 | 11.3 | 431.3 | (5.9) | 1.7 | | Grass Games | 3-3 | -5.4 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 29.0 | 13.2 | 376.8 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 390.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 27.0 | 13.5 | 360.0 | (4.9) | 1.0 | 32.5 | 17.5 | 410.5 | (5.6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 29.0 | 13.2 | 19.2 | 27:47 | 33-131 | (3.9) | 18-34 | 53.2% | 245 | (7.3) | 67-377 | (5.6) | (13) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.5 | 13.9 | 19.3 | 30:09 | 34-141 | (4.1) | 20-33 | 59.9% | 238 | (7.2) | 67-380 | (5.7) | (15.5) | | Offense Home Games | 33.0 | 16.3 | 21.0 | 28:16 | 39-176 | (4.6) | 17-31 | 54.8% | 204 | (6.6) | 70-380 | (5.5) | (11.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 22.3 | 10.3 | 20.0 | 32:12 | 42-197 | (4.6) | 15-30 | 48.9% | 193 | (6.4) | 72-390 | (5.4) | (17.5) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 14.1 | 20.1 | 30:49 | 41-203 | (5) | 16-28 | 57.3% | 208 | (7.6) | 68-412 | (6) | (14.5) | | Defense Home Games | 8.0 | 2.3 | 14.0 | 31:44 | 41-161 | (4) | 11-26 | 40.5% | 97 | (3.7) | 67-258 | (3.9) | (32.3) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DUKE 23.3, VIRGINIA TECH 32.5 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH is 4-4 against the spread versus DUKE since 1992 | | VIRGINIA TECH is 8-0 straight up against DUKE since 1992 | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| VIRGINIA TECH is 1-1 against the spread versus DUKE over the last 3 seasons | | VIRGINIA TECH is 2-0 straight up against DUKE over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH is 2-2 against the spread versus DUKE since 1992 | | VIRGINIA TECH is 4-0 straight up against DUKE since 1992 | | 3 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| VIRGINIA TECH is 1-0 against the spread versus DUKE over the last 3 seasons | | VIRGINIA TECH is 1-0 straight up against DUKE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/29/2011 | VIRGINIA TECH | 14 | -15 | SU Under | 14 | 21 | 32:30 | 42-243 | 17-28 | 190 | 0 | 2 | 9-94 | | | DUKE | 10 | 52.5 | ATS | 7 | 16 | 27:30 | 28-100 | 19-40 | 226 | 1 | 3 | 3-15 | | 10/23/2010 | DUKE | 7 | 64 | Under | 0 | 10 | 27:36 | 30-92 | 12-36 | 116 | 0 | 2 | 4-40 | | | VIRGINIA TECH | 44 | -27 | SU ATS | 27 | 19 | 32:24 | 39-159 | 19-31 | 332 | 1 | 0 | 3-19 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DUKE games 50.5% of the time since 1992. (98-96) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DUKE games 55.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (15-12) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VIRGINIA TECH games 47.9% of the time since 1992. (101-110) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in VIRGINIA TECH games 53.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (15-13) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in DUKE games 45.6% of the time since 1992. (36-43) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DUKE games 38.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (10-16) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in VIRGINIA TECH games 49.6% of the time since 1992. (65-66) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in VIRGINIA TECH games 42.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (11-15) | |
|
|
|
|
| [TE] 08/28/2012 - Braxton Deaver out for season ( Knee ) | | [WR] 08/07/2012 - Blair Holliday out for season ( Head ) | | [DT] 10/10/2012 - Jamal Bruce "?" Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Foot ) | | [S] 08/23/2012 - Taylor Sowell out for season ( Achilles ) | | [S] 08/24/2012 - Jeremy Cash out for season ( Eligibility ) | | [CB] 08/30/2012 - Jared Boyd out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [TE] 09/28/2012 - Jack Farrell out for season ( Leg ) | | [WR] 08/30/2012 - Tyree Watkins out for season ( Disciplinary ) | | [DE] 09/07/2012 - Allen Jackson out for season ( Shoulder ) | | [DE] 10/11/2012 - Justin Foxx is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Hand ) | | [S] 09/19/2012 - Corbin McCarthy out for season ( Shoulder ) | | [S] 10/11/2012 - Chris Tavarez is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Knee ) | | [CB] 10/08/2012 - Lee Butler probable Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Lower Body ) | | [S] 10/01/2012 - August Campbell has left team ( Personal ) | | [DE] 10/07/2012 - Jamal Wallace "?" Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Lower Body ) | | [QB] 10/07/2012 - Sean Renfree missed last game, probable Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Elbow ) | | [S] 10/11/2012 - Brandon Braxton is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Undisclosed ) | | [DE] 10/11/2012 - Dezmond Johnson doubtful Saturday vs. Virginia Tech ( Lower Body ) | |
| [OT] 09/01/2012 - Nick Acree out for season ( Knee ) | | [WR] 09/06/2012 - D.J. Coles out for season ( Knee ) | | [CB] 09/06/2012 - Boye Aromire left the team ( Personal ) | | [RB] 09/13/2012 - Trey Edmunds redshirt ( Undisclosed ) | | [LB] 10/09/2012 - Tariq Edwards "?" Saturday vs. Duke ( Leg ) | | [RB] 10/12/2012 - Tony Gregory is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Duke ( Knee ) | | [WR] 09/28/2012 - Joshua Stanford out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [FB] 10/08/2012 - Riley Beiro out for season ( Shoulder ) | | [C] 10/11/2012 - Caleb Farris is downgraded to expected to miss Saturday vs. Duke ( Ankle ) | | [WR] 10/12/2012 - Dyrell Roberts is upgraded to probable Saturday vs. Duke ( Head ) | | [G] 10/11/2012 - David Wang is downgraded to expected to miss Saturday vs. Duke ( Knee ) | | [TE] 10/11/2012 - Eric Martin doubtful Saturday vs. Duke ( Shoulder ) | | [WR] 10/11/2012 - Christian Reeves expected to miss Saturday vs. Duke ( Hamstring ) |
|
|