Free sports betting trends and statistical analysis at ScoresAndOdds.com

DOWNLOAD PRINTABLE SCHEDULES: BASEBALL

Page last updated on Thu Jun 21 21:44:03 EDT 2018

NFLPS | NFL | CFB | NBA | CBB | WNBA | MLB | NHL | AFL | CFL | NASCAR

Thursday at 6:00 PM			PITTSBURGH (6-6) AT BOWLING GREEN (10-3)
						Offensive Statistics			Defensive Statistics
Teams	Line	PF/PA	SU	ATS	O/U/P	RY	PY	TY	RY	PY	TY
213: PITTSBURGH 214: BOWLING GREEN	50.0 -6.5	26.0 / 27.2 35.4 / 14.8	6-6 10-3	4-8-0 10-3-0	5-6-0 3-9-1	114.9 207.5	236.8 265.1	351.8 472.5	160.6 142.5	213.5 166.2	374.1 308.7

Power Rating Line
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated.

	Power Rating
	Estimate	Edge
PITTSBURGH
BOWLING GREEN	-11

Team Trends and Angles
All team trends listed below apply to the current game.

PITTSBURGH - Recent ATS Trends
	Against the spread			Over/Under			Straight Up
	Current	Last 3	Since 1992	Current	Last 3	Since 1992	Current	Last 3	Since 1992
Description	W-L	W-L	W-L	O-U	O-U	O-U	W-L	W-L	W-L
in a bowl game	0-0	0-2	4-7	0-0	1-1	4-7	0-0	0-2	4-7
as an underdog of 3.5 to 10 points	1-1	5-3	17-24	0-2	2-6	10-23	1-1	2-6	8-34
in all games	4-8	19-19	119-128	5-6	15-20	76-90	6-6	18-20	128-136
in all lined games	4-8	19-19	119-128	5-6	15-20	76-90	6-6	18-20	116-135
as an underdog	2-3	10-7	62-65	2-3	8-9	36-47	1-4	4-13	31-99
as a neutral field underdog of 3.5 to 7 points	0-0	0-1	0-1	0-0	1-0	1-0	0-0	0-1	0-1
on a neutral field where the total is between 49.5 and 52	0-0	0-0	1-2	0-0	0-0	0-3	0-0	0-0	1-2
against MAC opponents	0-0	1-1	10-9	0-0	0-2	3-6	0-0	2-0	16-3
when playing on a Thursday	0-0	1-1	11-10	0-0	1-1	9-11	0-0	1-1	8-14
when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest	0-1	1-3	19-22	0-1	1-3	9-18	0-1	1-3	14-27
after playing a conference game	3-4	12-9	78-66	2-4	7-13	43-55	5-2	11-10	73-75
after a bye week	1-1	5-3	25-27	1-1	3-5	14-22	1-1	3-5	17-35
in dome games	0-1	1-1	6-7	0-1	0-2	3-5	1-0	1-1	6-7
in games played on a neutral field	0-0	0-2	4-7	0-0	1-1	4-7	0-0	0-2	4-7
in games played on turf	0-2	3-5	58-64	0-2	1-7	34-39	1-1	2-6	62-72
in December games	0-0	2-0	11-5	0-0	1-1	6-10	0-0	2-0	10-6
in non-conference games	2-2	7-9	45-52	1-2	6-7	31-34	3-1	8-8	57-55
off a loss against a conference rival	2-2	7-4	36-41	1-2	4-6	20-26	4-0	9-2	40-38
when playing against a team with a winning record	3-3	9-6	60-52	1-4	4-10	39-49	3-3	6-9	49-65

BOWLING GREEN - Recent ATS Trends
	Against the spread			Over/Under			Straight Up
	Current	Last 3	Since 1992	Current	Last 3	Since 1992	Current	Last 3	Since 1992
Description	W-L	W-L	W-L	O-U	O-U	O-U	W-L	W-L	W-L
in a bowl game	0-0	0-1	1-4	0-0	1-0	3-2	0-0	0-1	3-3
as a favorite of 3.5 to 10 points	3-1	6-3	21-14	1-3	2-7	10-18	3-1	6-3	26-12
in all games	10-3	25-13	102-81	3-9	11-25	49-68	10-3	23-15	143-116
in all lined games	10-3	25-13	102-81	3-9	11-25	49-68	10-3	23-15	99-88
as a favorite	8-2	15-6	52-43	2-7	5-14	25-36	9-1	17-4	72-26
as a neutral field favorite of 3.5 to 7 points	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-0	0-1	0-0	0-0	1-0
on a neutral field where the total is between 49.5 and 52	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0-0
against ACC opponents	0-0	0-1	0-2	0-0	0-1	1-1	0-0	0-1	0-3
when playing on a Thursday	1-0	2-1	4-3	0-1	1-2	2-5	1-0	2-1	5-5
when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest	0-1	0-2	7-8	0-1	1-1	5-3	0-1	0-2	13-8
after playing a conference game	6-2	15-8	65-54	2-5	7-15	29-45	6-2	13-10	95-77
after a bye week	1-1	2-3	11-16	0-1	1-3	9-9	1-1	2-3	18-17
in dome games	1-0	1-0	2-1	1-0	1-0	2-1	1-0	1-0	3-0
in games played on a neutral field	1-0	2-1	3-4	1-0	2-1	4-3	1-0	2-1	6-3
in games played on turf	9-3	16-8	40-30	3-8	6-16	21-34	10-2	18-6	47-34
in December games	1-0	1-1	2-4	1-0	2-0	5-1	1-0	1-1	4-3
in non-conference games	3-1	7-6	32-25	0-4	3-9	16-22	2-2	6-7	38-43
off a win against a conference rival	5-2	9-6	36-33	2-5	6-9	18-26	5-2	9-6	42-31
after 2 or more consecutive straight up wins	4-2	8-4	26-24	2-4	3-9	12-19	4-2	8-4	50-26

Team Statistics
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green.

PITTSBURGH - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team					Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	Yards	YPP	TO	Score	Half	Yards	YPP	TO
All Games	6-6	-1.5	4-8	5-6	26.0	13.8	351.7	(5.3)	1.4	27.2	15.1	374.1	(5.6)	1.3
Road Games	2-3	-2	1-4	1-4	23.0	13.2	322.6	(5)	0.8	27.0	13.6	367.8	(5.5)	1.4
Last 3 Games	1-2	-1.3	0-3	2-1	25.0	7.7	366.3	(4.9)	2.0	30.3	21.3	368.3	(5.8)	0.7
Dome Games	1-0	+1	0-1	0-1	17.0	10.0	239.0	(3.5)	2.0	16.0	9.0	307.0	(4.6)	0.0

PITTSBURGH - Current Season Statistics
					Rushing		Passing				Total
	PPG	Half	FD	TOP	ATT-YDS	YPR	CMP-ATT	PCT	YDS	PYA	ATT-YDS	YPP	YPPT
Offense (All Games)	26.0	13.8	19.1	30:57	34-115	(3.3)	19-32	60.9%	237	(7.5)	66-352	(5.3)	(13.5)
Opponents Defensive Avg.	26	13.6	20.2	30:53	39-166	(4.2)	18-31	58.6%	221	(7.1)	70-387	(5.5)	(14.9)
Offense Road Games	23.0	13.2	18.2	31:15	32-70	(2.2)	22-33	65.3%	253	(7.6)	65-323	(5)	(14)
Defense (All Games)	27.2	15.1	18.7	29:03	37-161	(4.3)	17-29	57.8%	213	(7.3)	66-374	(5.6)	(13.8)
Opponents Offensive Avg.	32.6	17.1	21.4	30:17	42-202	(4.9)	17-29	59.4%	225	(7.6)	71-426	(6)	(13.1)
Defense Road Games	27.0	13.6	19.0	28:45	43-187	(4.4)	14-25	58.5%	181	(7.4)	67-368	(5.5)	(13.6)

BOWLING GREEN - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team					Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	Yards	YPP	TO	Score	Half	Yards	YPP	TO
All Games	10-3	+2.5	10-3	3-9	35.4	18.3	472.5	(6.7)	0.8	14.8	9.9	308.7	(4.8)	1.6
Road Games	5-2	+1.4	6-1	3-3	35.0	19.9	491.4	(6.8)	1.1	18.4	13.4	329.7	(5.1)	2.0
Last 3 Games	3-0	+2.4	3-0	2-1	43.0	22.7	541.3	(7.6)	1.3	13.7	9.0	251.7	(3.9)	2.3
Dome Games	1-0	+1.4	1-0	1-0	47.0	31.0	574.0	(8.6)	1.0	27.0	13.0	454.0	(5.5)	2.0

BOWLING GREEN - Current Season Statistics
					Rushing		Passing				Total
	PPG	Half	FD	TOP	ATT-YDS	YPR	CMP-ATT	PCT	YDS	PYA	ATT-YDS	YPP	YPPT
Offense (All Games)	35.4	18.3	23.5	34:16	42-207	(4.9)	18-29	63.1%	265	(9.3)	70-473	(6.7)	(13.4)
Opponents Defensive Avg.	32.7	17.2	22.9	31:50	41-203	(5)	19-31	61.0%	248	(7.9)	72-452	(6.3)	(13.8)
Offense Road Games	35.0	19.9	24.0	34:20	41-206	(5)	19-31	60.7%	286	(9.1)	72-491	(6.8)	(14)
Defense (All Games)	14.8	9.9	16.9	25:44	33-143	(4.3)	17-31	54.7%	166	(5.4)	64-309	(4.8)	(20.9)
Opponents Offensive Avg.	23.8	12.3	19.9	29:12	38-172	(4.5)	18-32	56.8%	205	(6.4)	70-377	(5.4)	(15.8)
Defense Road Games	18.4	13.4	18.1	25:40	35-151	(4.3)	16-30	52.7%	179	(6)	65-330	(5.1)	(17.9)

Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 39.6, BOWLING GREEN 21

Current Season Results And Upcoming Games
Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed.

PITTSBURGH - Season Results
								Team Stats			Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Rushing	Passing	TO	Rushing	Passing	TO
11/2/2013	@ GEORGIA TECH	10-21	L	11.5	W	53.5	U	21--5	25-37-233	1	53-276	5-10-84	2
11/9/2013	NOTRE DAME	28-21	W	5	W	51	U	41-112	22-35-243	0	24-138	18-39-318	3
11/16/2013	N CAROLINA	27-34	L	-1.5	L	53.5	O	40-46	23-39-313	2	35-149	15-27-173	2
11/23/2013	@ SYRACUSE	17-16	W	-2	L	50.5	U	27-21	28-41-218	2	39-148	18-28-159	0
11/29/2013	MIAMI	31-41	L	0	L	55.5	O	33-220	24-43-281	2	34-180	17-28-296	0
12/26/2013	*BOWLING GREEN

BOWLING GREEN - Season Results
								Team Stats			Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Rushing	Passing	TO	Rushing	Passing	TO
11/5/2013	@ MIAMI OHIO	45-3	W	-24	W	48	P	41-189	21-30-258	1	37-97	15-25-131	3
11/12/2013	OHIO U	49-0	W	-7.5	W	52.5	U	41-207	13-20-253	1	29-56	18-33-116	2
11/23/2013	@ E MICHIGAN	58-7	W	-26	W	54.5	O	46-296	13-26-264	1	26-61	1-18-4	3
11/29/2013	@ BUFFALO	24-7	W	-3.5	W	51.5	U	48-260	11-26-230	2	24-15	21-45-221	2
12/6/2013	*N ILLINOIS	47-27	W	3	W	58.5	O	40-181	21-27-393	1	42-235	21-40-219	2
12/26/2013	*PITTSBURGH

Head-to-Head Series History
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups.

All games in this series since 1992

PITTSBURGH is 2-1 against the spread versus BOWLING GREEN since 1992

PITTSBURGH is 2-1 straight up against BOWLING GREEN since 1992

1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992

Games over the last 3 seasons

There were no past matchups in this series during this time period.

Team Line Action - Where the money is going!

Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%.

As indicated by the movement of the line, the betting public is favoring BOWLING GREEN in this game

The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PITTSBURGH games 55% of the time since 1992. (121-99)

The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PITTSBURGH games 52.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (18-16)

The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOWLING GREEN games 43.9% of the time since 1992. (72-92)

The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BOWLING GREEN games 31.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (11-24)

Edge=PITTSBURGH

As indicated by the movement of the total, the betting public is favoring the UNDER in this game
The betting public is correct when moving the total in PITTSBURGH games 52.7% of the time since 1992. (77-69)
The betting public is correct when moving the total in PITTSBURGH games 56.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (17-13)
The betting public is correct when moving the total in BOWLING GREEN games 51.9% of the time since 1992. (56-52)
The betting public is correct when moving the total in BOWLING GREEN games 51.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (16-15)
No Edge.