|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 20-27 | 118-98 | 700-683 | 20-28 | 96-122 | 688-698 | 29-19 | 152-66 | 696-708 | | as an underdog | 10-9 | 27-18 | 374-362 | 8-11 | 15-30 | 375-357 | 9-10 | 21-24 | 213-533 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 3-2 | 9-6 | 55-58 | 4-1 | 7-8 | 51-60 | 2-3 | 5-10 | 38-76 | | in road games | 13-8 | 63-42 | 358-328 | 13-9 | 53-53 | 367-321 | 14-8 | 67-39 | 270-427 | | in a road game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 0-0 | 2-3 | 50-41 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 47-46 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 40-55 | | in February games | 2-1 | 18-10 | 108-95 | 2-1 | 16-12 | 109-92 | 1-2 | 20-8 | 103-104 | | second half of the season | 2-1 | 52-35 | 337-293 | 2-1 | 43-44 | 344-288 | 1-2 | 67-20 | 330-314 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 3-8 | 18-23 | 123-138 | 4-7 | 22-19 | 131-131 | 6-5 | 28-13 | 125-141 | | against Northwest division opponents | 0-3 | 9-9 | 40-38 | 1-2 | 9-9 | 42-36 | 1-2 | 10-8 | 40-38 | | after a division game | 7-3 | 26-18 | 185-196 | 5-5 | 25-20 | 191-189 | 6-4 | 33-12 | 190-196 | | in non-conference games | 4-12 | 33-31 | 214-236 | 4-12 | 27-37 | 219-233 | 6-10 | 41-23 | 200-258 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 1-3 | 12-7 | 150-140 | 1-3 | 4-15 | 160-136 | 2-2 | 13-6 | 125-173 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 1-4 | 10-12 | 187-162 | 3-3 | 12-11 | 176-173 | 4-2 | 15-8 | 140-217 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 1-3 | 18-9 | 90-78 | 1-3 | 10-17 | 84-84 | 1-3 | 21-6 | 80-91 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 14-13 | 60-44 | 349-340 | 13-14 | 42-63 | 339-350 | 17-10 | 64-41 | 301-399 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 3-1 | 31-21 | 191-177 | 3-1 | 22-30 | 189-181 | 2-2 | 32-20 | 170-205 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 7-7 | 36-32 | 198-180 | 6-8 | 27-41 | 169-211 | 8-6 | 49-19 | 229-156 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 14-14 | 111-90 | 0-1 | 11-17 | 102-100 | 1-0 | 22-6 | 131-74 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 8-6 | 39-29 | 188-184 | 5-9 | 27-42 | 164-206 | 8-6 | 46-23 | 183-195 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-0 | 14-17 | 107-95 | 0-0 | 14-17 | 103-98 | 0-0 | 20-11 | 110-95 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 29-20 | 116-90 | 678-655 | 28-20 | 99-102 | 668-658 | 31-18 | 123-86 | 640-720 | | as a favorite | 19-13 | 66-59 | 296-278 | 17-14 | 58-66 | 299-268 | 24-8 | 91-37 | 412-169 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 3-2 | 12-16 | 73-75 | 3-2 | 9-20 | 76-71 | 4-1 | 18-11 | 93-56 | | in home games | 16-8 | 53-47 | 346-317 | 13-10 | 46-52 | 335-320 | 21-3 | 77-26 | 415-261 | | in a home game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 0-0 | 8-5 | 53-43 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 55-42 | 0-0 | 11-2 | 62-36 | | in February games | 2-0 | 17-13 | 93-107 | 2-0 | 15-15 | 109-84 | 2-0 | 14-16 | 84-121 | | second half of the season | 2-0 | 50-36 | 316-312 | 2-0 | 35-49 | 316-304 | 2-0 | 49-38 | 291-353 | | against Central division opponents | 4-2 | 16-6 | 100-92 | 3-3 | 13-8 | 105-89 | 6-0 | 19-3 | 92-104 | | after a non-conference game | 9-6 | 37-25 | 222-225 | 10-5 | 36-25 | 240-203 | 8-7 | 38-25 | 203-256 | | in non-conference games | 6-10 | 38-26 | 232-220 | 9-7 | 34-28 | 239-210 | 9-7 | 45-19 | 229-231 | | after 3 or more consecutive overs | 4-3 | 13-11 | 90-72 | 5-2 | 14-10 | 84-80 | 5-2 | 13-11 | 87-80 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 12-11 | 45-53 | 245-237 | 14-8 | 43-49 | 243-233 | 16-7 | 57-41 | 268-222 | | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 2-2 | 10-14 | 60-62 | 4-0 | 12-10 | 61-62 | 3-1 | 15-9 | 59-67 | | after 3 or more consecutive wins | 7-6 | 20-19 | 85-91 | 10-3 | 21-17 | 93-81 | 9-4 | 25-16 | 100-80 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 13-10 | 62-49 | 362-338 | 14-9 | 49-60 | 339-362 | 15-8 | 58-54 | 283-439 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 3-1 | 31-17 | 178-172 | 3-1 | 20-27 | 171-181 | 4-0 | 29-20 | 141-221 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 29-19 | -3.4 | 20-27 | 20-28 | 93.6 | 46.9 | 43.9% | 52.5 | 91.0 | 44.7 | 42.8% | 49.9 | | Road Games | 14-8 | +10.6 | 13-8 | 13-9 | 95.7 | 47.9 | 45.4% | 50.9 | 94.2 | 45.2 | 44.1% | 49.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 96.0 | 48.6 | 44.6% | 50.2 | 90.6 | 44.4 | 44.8% | 51.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 93.6 | 46.9 | 36-81 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 18-22 | 78.2% | 52 | 13 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.4 | 49 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 95.7 | 47.9 | 37-80 | 45.4% | 4-14 | 30.5% | 18-23 | 79.3% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.0 | 44.7 | 35-81 | 42.8% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 16-22 | 74.5% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.8 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 16-22 | 74.9% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 94.2 | 45.2 | 36-81 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 35.4% | 16-22 | 72.5% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 31-18 | +1.5 | 29-20 | 28-20 | 104.2 | 51.6 | 46.8% | 55.2 | 100.7 | 51.4 | 44.3% | 51.9 | | Home Games | 21-3 | +8.4 | 16-8 | 13-10 | 108.4 | 52.6 | 47.5% | 55.5 | 99.3 | 49.8 | 44.6% | 51.1 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 4-0 | 113.2 | 56.8 | 49.5% | 52.0 | 101.2 | 54.6 | 47.2% | 50.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 104.2 | 51.6 | 40-85 | 46.8% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 18-26 | 68.8% | 55 | 14 | 24 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 108.4 | 52.6 | 41-86 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 20-28 | 69.6% | 55 | 14 | 25 | 21 | 10 | 14 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 100.7 | 51.4 | 38-86 | 44.3% | 8-23 | 35.8% | 17-23 | 73.4% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.2 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 99.3 | 49.8 | 38-84 | 44.6% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 16-23 | 72.6% | 51 | 11 | 23 | 23 | 7 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 94.7, DENVER 95.4 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 186 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-104 | L | -6 | L | 190 | O | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 15 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 55 | 16 | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 108-101 | W | 4.5 | W | 193.5 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 49 | 18 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 49 | 12 | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | 81-97 | L | -8.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 32-88 | 36.4% | 48 | 10 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 57 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 97-58 | W | -4.5 | W | 183.5 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 67 | 13 | 24-82 | 29.3% | 47 | 14 | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | 107-105 | W | -4.5 | L | 183 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 60 | 14 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 53 | 12 | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | 100-99 | W | 2.5 | W | 181.5 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 54 | 21 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 55 | 11 | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | 82-85 | L | 2 | L | 175 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 58 | 15 | 34-84 | 40.5% | 61 | 12 | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | 95-83 | W | 0 | W | 194.5 | U | 39-93 | 41.9% | 52 | 8 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 62 | 15 | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | 85-82 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 43 | 12 | | 1/25/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 103-87 | W | -2.5 | W | 189 | O | 41-88 | 46.6% | 64 | 15 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 44 | 11 | | 1/26/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-86 | L | -1 | L | 184 | U | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 16 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 48 | 9 | | 1/28/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 93-85 | W | -13 | L | 185 | U | 35-78 | 44.9% | 56 | 11 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 51 | 10 | | 1/30/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 104-88 | W | 1 | W | 190.5 | O | 45-91 | 49.5% | 51 | 11 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 51 | 18 | | 2/1/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 89-93 | L | 5 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 13 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 51 | 14 | | 2/2/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 93-76 | W | 7 | W | 182 | U | 38-93 | 40.9% | 62 | 7 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 52 | 14 | | 2/4/2013 | @ INDIANA | 101-111 | L | 5.5 | L | 176 | O | 39-88 | 44.3% | 41 | 10 | 39-74 | 52.7% | 53 | 16 | | 2/7/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/29/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 72-81 | L | 6.5 | L | 196 | U | 29-68 | 42.6% | 45 | 16 | 36-89 | 40.4% | 57 | 8 | | 1/1/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 92-78 | W | 0 | W | 207.5 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 60 | 15 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 59 | 13 | | 1/3/2013 | MINNESOTA | 97-101 | L | -8.5 | L | 201 | U | 40-86 | 46.5% | 46 | 7 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 64 | 13 | | 1/5/2013 | UTAH | 110-91 | W | -10 | W | 202 | U | 39-76 | 51.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 51 | 19 | | 1/6/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 112-105 | W | 5.5 | W | 214 | O | 44-101 | 43.6% | 57 | 8 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 60 | 18 | | 1/9/2013 | ORLANDO | 108-105 | W | -11.5 | L | 204 | O | 41-94 | 43.6% | 68 | 10 | 44-93 | 47.3% | 49 | 11 | | 1/11/2013 | CLEVELAND | 98-91 | W | -12.5 | L | 206.5 | U | 36-82 | 43.9% | 63 | 22 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 44 | 15 | | 1/13/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | 116-105 | W | -6.5 | W | 209 | O | 43-90 | 47.8% | 51 | 8 | 43-83 | 51.8% | 44 | 18 | | 1/15/2013 | PORTLAND | 115-111 | W | -9 | L | 202 | O | 47-99 | 47.5% | 48 | 10 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 61 | 18 | | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 97-117 | L | 9 | L | 209 | O | 33-73 | 45.2% | 49 | 19 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 46 | 14 | | 1/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 108-112 | L | -10.5 | L | 203 | O | 41-84 | 48.8% | 46 | 14 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 57 | 20 | | 1/20/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 121-118 | W | 1 | W | 208.5 | O | 45-93 | 48.4% | 62 | 23 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 46 | 23 | | 1/23/2013 | @ HOUSTON | 105-95 | W | 3 | W | 218 | U | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 14 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 50 | 22 | | 1/26/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 121-93 | W | -12.5 | W | 214 | P | 47-89 | 52.8% | 55 | 15 | 37-88 | 42.0% | 52 | 19 | | 1/28/2013 | INDIANA | 102-101 | W | -5.5 | L | 193.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 14 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 49 | 18 | | 1/30/2013 | HOUSTON | 118-110 | W | -4 | W | 216.5 | O | 42-82 | 51.2% | 51 | 20 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 52 | 21 | | 2/1/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 113-98 | W | -7.5 | W | 205 | O | 44-84 | 52.4% | 38 | 8 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 43 | 21 | | 2/5/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 112-104 | W | -7 | W | 213 | O | 40-91 | 44.0% | 64 | 17 | 48-100 | 48.0% | 55 | 16 | | 2/7/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| DENVER is 15-14 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | DENVER is 17-12 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 17 of 29 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| DENVER is 2-1 against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | DENVER is 2-1 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 8-6 against the spread versus DENVER since 1996 | | DENVER is 11-3 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 8 of 14 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 1-0 against the spread versus DENVER over the last 3 seasons | | DENVER is 1-0 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/26/2012 | DENVER | 108 | 198.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 44-88 | 50.0% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 54 | 14 | 9 | | | CHICAGO | 91 | -8 | Over | 52 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 36 | 5 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.4% of the time since 1996. (508-563) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (82-91) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (541-522) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in DENVER games 57.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (91-67) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 49.8% of the time since 1996. (612-616) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 51.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (99-92) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 48.8% of the time since 1996. (565-592) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in DENVER games 47.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (86-96) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 02/07/2013 - Joakim Noah is upgraded to probable Thursday vs. Denver ( Plantar Fasciitis ) | | [G] 02/03/2013 - Kirk Hinrich out indefinitely ( Arm ) | | [G] 02/07/2013 - Marco Belinelli is downgraded to doubtful Thursday vs. Denver ( Ankle ) | | [F] 02/07/2013 - Carlos Boozer probable Thursday vs. Denver ( Hamstring ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|