|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 23-22 | 98-92 | 673-653 | 25-21 | 94-98 | 644-674 | 24-22 | 101-93 | 732-620 | | as an underdog | 9-11 | 44-47 | 304-268 | 13-8 | 46-47 | 276-295 | 7-14 | 32-61 | 209-373 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 3-3 | 11-14 | 94-76 | 3-3 | 9-16 | 79-88 | 3-3 | 10-15 | 76-96 | | in road games | 9-13 | 46-48 | 352-309 | 11-12 | 47-50 | 332-325 | 9-14 | 39-58 | 307-369 | | in a road game where where the total is between 205 and 209.5 points | 1-2 | 8-9 | 24-21 | 1-2 | 7-10 | 23-23 | 2-1 | 6-11 | 20-26 | | in January games | 6-9 | 23-25 | 114-123 | 7-8 | 24-25 | 121-116 | 7-8 | 23-26 | 123-122 | | against Northwest division opponents | 2-7 | 19-25 | 84-81 | 4-6 | 21-24 | 80-91 | 2-8 | 19-27 | 99-74 | | after a non-conference game | 12-8 | 38-28 | 227-223 | 12-8 | 34-33 | 220-227 | 12-8 | 42-26 | 259-205 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 4-13 | 34-42 | 162-142 | 9-8 | 38-40 | 153-151 | 6-11 | 36-42 | 174-142 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 10-3 | 26-20 | 171-185 | 9-4 | 27-19 | 173-182 | 9-4 | 21-25 | 197-167 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 10-11 | 37-40 | 171-187 | 12-9 | 44-34 | 174-185 | 12-9 | 39-39 | 197-174 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 12-10 | 47-48 | 346-336 | 15-7 | 53-42 | 312-361 | 11-11 | 42-54 | 300-403 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 1-1 | 17-21 | 178-177 | 1-1 | 19-18 | 157-192 | 1-1 | 16-22 | 164-203 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 22-21 | 91-101 | 705-682 | 21-22 | 94-98 | 697-695 | 24-20 | 99-97 | 823-596 | | as a favorite | 13-9 | 46-49 | 437-395 | 9-13 | 44-50 | 410-426 | 17-5 | 65-30 | 622-231 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 3-1 | 8-8 | 83-66 | 1-3 | 5-10 | 61-86 | 3-1 | 10-6 | 108-45 | | in home games | 13-6 | 48-46 | 366-323 | 9-10 | 42-51 | 330-364 | 15-4 | 61-34 | 507-200 | | in a home game where where the total is between 205 and 209.5 points | 0-0 | 6-6 | 22-20 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 18-26 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 34-11 | | in January games | 8-4 | 21-22 | 104-115 | 5-7 | 22-21 | 123-105 | 9-3 | 27-16 | 137-96 | | against Southwest division opponents | 5-5 | 19-29 | 89-84 | 4-6 | 19-30 | 80-94 | 5-5 | 17-32 | 87-88 | | after a non-conference game | 8-7 | 25-38 | 229-226 | 8-7 | 33-30 | 235-221 | 9-7 | 26-38 | 267-205 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 8-10 | 42-48 | 277-289 | 13-5 | 43-47 | 272-297 | 8-11 | 41-52 | 303-279 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 5-5 | 32-28 | 158-139 | 6-4 | 31-28 | 159-137 | 6-5 | 34-27 | 189-118 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 5-4 | 25-29 | 196-181 | 4-5 | 26-28 | 205-177 | 5-5 | 27-28 | 235-160 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-10 | 42-53 | 363-357 | 9-8 | 51-45 | 360-363 | 6-12 | 37-62 | 363-381 | | when playing against a team with a winning record - 2nd half of the season | 1-0 | 18-22 | 204-190 | 1-0 | 23-18 | 184-212 | 1-0 | 15-27 | 200-204 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 9-7 | 30-39 | 219-210 | 6-10 | 30-39 | 219-211 | 10-6 | 41-29 | 287-155 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 10-16 | 122-111 | 0-1 | 10-16 | 120-114 | 0-1 | 11-16 | 154-86 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 8-8 | 32-38 | 226-213 | 7-9 | 27-43 | 207-231 | 7-9 | 32-40 | 235-218 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 13-19 | 131-122 | 0-1 | 11-22 | 108-145 | 0-1 | 10-24 | 134-128 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-22 | -0.2 | 23-22 | 25-21 | 104.4 | 51.9 | 45.4% | 52.2 | 102.9 | 51.7 | 45.7% | 50.5 | | Road Games | 9-14 | -3.3 | 9-13 | 11-12 | 100.2 | 49.4 | 44.0% | 52.5 | 102.1 | 51.7 | 45.6% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 98.6 | 47.4 | 42.7% | 54.8 | 95.8 | 47.0 | 43.7% | 45.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 104.4 | 51.9 | 38-83 | 45.4% | 10-28 | 35.8% | 19-26 | 75.5% | 52 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.1 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 100.2 | 49.4 | 36-82 | 44.0% | 10-28 | 34.4% | 18-25 | 74.6% | 52 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 102.9 | 51.7 | 39-86 | 45.7% | 8-22 | 37.2% | 16-21 | 77.6% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.7 | 49 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 102.1 | 51.7 | 38-84 | 45.6% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 18-23 | 79.4% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-20 | +5.1 | 22-21 | 21-22 | 98.5 | 48.4 | 44.9% | 50.8 | 98.7 | 48.7 | 46.0% | 49.4 | | Home Games | 15-4 | +10.8 | 13-6 | 9-10 | 102.2 | 52.9 | 46.0% | 52.9 | 95.7 | 47.7 | 42.9% | 49.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 100.6 | 49.2 | 47.5% | 47.6 | 99.0 | 45.0 | 47.5% | 47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 98.5 | 48.4 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 36.7% | 19-24 | 77.0% | 51 | 12 | 23 | 22 | 9 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.9 | 49.3 | 37-83 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 102.2 | 52.9 | 38-82 | 46.0% | 6-16 | 37.3% | 21-26 | 79.3% | 53 | 11 | 24 | 23 | 8 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 98.7 | 48.7 | 37-81 | 46.0% | 7-18 | 37.7% | 18-24 | 74.8% | 49 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.1 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 74.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 95.7 | 47.7 | 35-82 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 19-25 | 76.2% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: HOUSTON 96.6, UTAH 96.5 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/19/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 125-103 | W | -8 | W | 199 | O | 42-75 | 56.0% | 49 | 10 | 40-89 | 44.9% | 46 | 11 | | 12/22/2012 | MEMPHIS | 121-96 | W | -1.5 | W | 196 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 43 | 15 | 42-79 | 53.2% | 41 | 19 | | 12/25/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 120-97 | W | 5 | W | 197.5 | O | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | | 12/26/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 87-84 | W | 5.5 | W | 210.5 | U | 33-81 | 40.7% | 55 | 16 | 32-84 | 38.1% | 52 | 14 | | 12/28/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 116-122 | L | 8.5 | W | 213.5 | O | 45-86 | 52.3% | 49 | 24 | 44-77 | 57.1% | 38 | 19 | | 12/29/2012 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 94-124 | L | 4.5 | L | 212.5 | O | 33-83 | 39.8% | 45 | 24 | 45-94 | 47.9% | 63 | 21 | | 12/31/2012 | ATLANTA | 123-104 | W | -4.5 | W | 206 | O | 45-84 | 53.6% | 49 | 9 | 43-90 | 47.8% | 43 | 14 | | 1/2/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | 104-92 | W | -10 | W | 202.5 | U | 41-83 | 49.4% | 54 | 11 | 38-90 | 42.2% | 55 | 10 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 115-101 | W | 0 | W | 214 | O | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 112-104 | W | -6 | W | 213 | O | 37-79 | 46.8% | 56 | 17 | 36-91 | 39.6% | 54 | 13 | | 1/8/2013 | LA LAKERS | 125-112 | W | -8.5 | W | 223.5 | O | 48-87 | 55.2% | 50 | 18 | 43-91 | 47.3% | 43 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 79-88 | L | -2 | L | 200.5 | U | 30-75 | 40.0% | 47 | 22 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 53 | 16 | | 1/11/2013 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 3 | L | 201.5 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 52 | 14 | 41-79 | 51.9% | 52 | 16 | | 1/12/2013 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 100-107 | L | 1 | L | 204 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 16 | 43-87 | 49.4% | 49 | 11 | | 1/15/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | 109-117 | L | -4 | L | 206.5 | O | 41-82 | 50.0% | 48 | 15 | 42-78 | 53.8% | 44 | 16 | | 1/16/2013 | @ DALLAS | 100-105 | L | 4 | L | 214.5 | U | 33-84 | 39.3% | 62 | 16 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 58 | 10 | | 1/18/2013 | @ INDIANA | 95-105 | L | 4.5 | L | 195 | O | 34-83 | 41.0% | 47 | 18 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 54 | 13 | | 1/19/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-92 | L | -5.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 25-78 | 32.1% | 54 | 20 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 47 | 15 | | 1/21/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 100-94 | W | -7.5 | L | 208.5 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 60 | 13 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 45 | 10 | | 1/23/2013 | DENVER | 95-105 | L | -3 | L | 218 | U | 37-83 | 44.6% | 50 | 22 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 14 | | 1/25/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 100-82 | W | 2.5 | W | 200.5 | U | 34-71 | 47.9% | 50 | 21 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 44 | 15 | | 1/26/2013 | BROOKLYN | 119-106 | W | -4 | W | 200 | O | 43-87 | 49.4% | 60 | 11 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 37 | 10 | | 1/28/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2013 | PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/19/2012 | @ INDIANA | 84-104 | L | 3.5 | L | 185.5 | O | 32-86 | 37.2% | 60 | 15 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 45 | 15 | | 12/22/2012 | @ MIAMI | 89-105 | L | 7.5 | L | 198.5 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 40 | 19 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 46 | 16 | | 12/23/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 97-93 | W | 1.5 | W | 187.5 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 45 | 11 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 54 | 19 | | 12/26/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 83-94 | L | -4 | L | 203 | U | 32-83 | 38.6% | 61 | 14 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 47 | 10 | | 12/28/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 114-116 | L | 3 | W | 191 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 17 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 44 | 15 | | 12/30/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 96-107 | L | 10.5 | L | 197 | O | 33-80 | 41.2% | 51 | 16 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 52 | 12 | | 1/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | 106-84 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 43-87 | 49.4% | 58 | 12 | 29-84 | 34.5% | 50 | 11 | | 1/4/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 87-80 | W | 1.5 | W | 198 | U | 40-89 | 44.9% | 48 | 10 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 48 | 20 | | 1/5/2013 | @ DENVER | 91-110 | L | 10 | L | 202 | U | 28-78 | 35.9% | 51 | 19 | 39-76 | 51.3% | 56 | 19 | | 1/7/2013 | DALLAS | 100-94 | W | -5 | W | 198.5 | U | 31-77 | 40.3% | 53 | 11 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 49 | 10 | | 1/9/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 112-102 | W | -4.5 | W | 199 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 50 | 16 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 49 | 15 | | 1/11/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 95-103 | L | 5 | L | 193.5 | O | 36-76 | 47.4% | 41 | 16 | 40-72 | 55.6% | 44 | 13 | | 1/12/2013 | @ DETROIT | 90-87 | W | 2.5 | W | 192.5 | U | 36-71 | 50.7% | 38 | 16 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 41 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | MIAMI | 104-97 | W | 2.5 | W | 198 | O | 36-76 | 47.4% | 55 | 14 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 28 | 14 | | 1/19/2013 | CLEVELAND | 109-98 | W | -8.5 | W | 199 | O | 45-90 | 50.0% | 53 | 8 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 9 | | 1/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 92-88 | W | -7 | L | 195 | U | 38-85 | 44.7% | 57 | 14 | 31-86 | 36.0% | 58 | 15 | | 1/25/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | 84-102 | L | 5 | L | 205 | U | 34-81 | 42.0% | 37 | 10 | 43-80 | 53.7% | 56 | 18 | | 1/26/2013 | INDIANA | 114-110 | W | -2 | W | 183 | O | 44-83 | 53.0% | 36 | 14 | 44-81 | 54.3% | 46 | 21 | | 1/28/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2013 | PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| UTAH is 46-34 against the spread versus HOUSTON since 1996 | | UTAH is 54-31 straight up against HOUSTON since 1996 | | 48 of 78 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| UTAH is 5-3 against the spread versus HOUSTON over the last 3 seasons | | UTAH is 4-4 straight up against HOUSTON over the last 3 seasons | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| UTAH is 24-16 against the spread versus HOUSTON since 1996 | | UTAH is 34-8 straight up against HOUSTON since 1996 | | 27 of 38 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| UTAH is 2-1 against the spread versus HOUSTON over the last 3 seasons | | UTAH is 2-1 straight up against HOUSTON over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/2012 | UTAH | 116 | 206 | Over | 49 | 48-94 | 51.1% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 46 | 12 | 14 | | | HOUSTON | 124 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 58 | 46-83 | 55.4% | 11-22 | 50.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 11/19/2012 | HOUSTON | 91 | 197 | Under | 44 | 30-86 | 34.9% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 24-31 | 77.4% | 60 | 15 | 14 | | | UTAH | 102 | -6 | SU ATS | 61 | 37-92 | 40.2% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 62 | 14 | 14 | 04/11/2012 | UTAH | 103 | 198 | SU ATS | 56 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 50 | 7 | 11 | | | HOUSTON | 91 | -6 | Under | 46 | 31-87 | 35.6% | 4-20 | 20.0% | 25-29 | 86.2% | 53 | 14 | 8 | 02/29/2012 | HOUSTON | 83 | 194 | Under | 44 | 32-82 | 39.0% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 39 | 10 | 15 | | | UTAH | 104 | -2 | SU ATS | 49 | 42-87 | 48.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 16-16 | 100.0% | 59 | 13 | 18 | 02/19/2012 | UTAH | 85 | 195.5 | Under | 46 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 49 | 15 | 12 | | | HOUSTON | 101 | -6 | SU ATS | 45 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 46 | 10 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in HOUSTON games 52% of the time since 1996. (540-499) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in HOUSTON games 52.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (81-74) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.2% of the time since 1996. (566-539) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 52% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (79-73) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in HOUSTON games 54.2% of the time since 1996. (626-530) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in HOUSTON games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (88-88) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 51% of the time since 1996. (623-599) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 56% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (93-73) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 12/27/2012 - Royce White out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | |
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Raja Bell out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [G] 12/27/2012 - Mo Williams out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 01/27/2013 - Gordon Hayward injured last game, "?" Monday vs. Houston ( Shoulder ) |
|
|