|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 17-18 | 114-110 | 700-712 | 16-19 | 107-117 | 659-744 | 24-11 | 158-69 | 819-620 | | as a favorite | 16-18 | 103-96 | 432-437 | 16-18 | 94-104 | 416-443 | 23-11 | 147-54 | 639-246 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less | 0-3 | 8-12 | 64-48 | 1-2 | 7-13 | 49-62 | 0-3 | 8-12 | 67-46 | | in road games | 6-10 | 54-55 | 353-346 | 7-9 | 52-56 | 324-371 | 8-8 | 64-46 | 334-378 | | in a road game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 1-3 | 9-11 | 39-33 | 1-3 | 10-9 | 33-39 | 1-3 | 11-9 | 40-34 | | in January games | 2-4 | 16-20 | 112-117 | 2-4 | 22-15 | 121-108 | 3-3 | 24-13 | 124-109 | | against Northwest division opponents | 4-2 | 15-12 | 44-43 | 1-5 | 14-12 | 53-33 | 5-1 | 18-9 | 50-37 | | after a non-conference game | 12-4 | 37-34 | 230-217 | 6-10 | 33-38 | 223-223 | 14-2 | 49-24 | 259-200 | | in non-conference games | 9-8 | 39-36 | 232-219 | 9-8 | 41-34 | 221-229 | 13-4 | 50-26 | 252-210 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 7-5 | 47-42 | 193-205 | 3-9 | 35-52 | 171-224 | 7-5 | 64-26 | 246-161 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 6-7 | 35-37 | 135-135 | 6-7 | 28-42 | 116-153 | 9-4 | 48-24 | 178-99 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 2-4 | 13-11 | 72-75 | 4-2 | 13-13 | 74-73 | 5-1 | 18-8 | 86-64 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-10 | 64-63 | 357-378 | 4-12 | 58-70 | 330-405 | 8-8 | 78-52 | 355-401 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 19-19 | 88-99 | 702-680 | 18-20 | 91-96 | 694-693 | 20-19 | 95-96 | 819-595 | | as an underdog | 8-11 | 43-51 | 258-281 | 11-8 | 48-47 | 279-261 | 6-14 | 32-66 | 191-359 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less | 2-0 | 6-5 | 32-29 | 2-0 | 6-6 | 29-33 | 0-2 | 4-8 | 30-32 | | in home games | 10-5 | 45-45 | 363-322 | 6-9 | 39-50 | 327-363 | 11-4 | 57-34 | 503-200 | | in a home game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 7-2 | 15-5 | 56-48 | 4-5 | 9-11 | 45-58 | 8-1 | 17-4 | 74-32 | | in January games | 5-2 | 18-20 | 101-113 | 2-5 | 19-19 | 120-103 | 5-2 | 23-15 | 133-95 | | against Southeast division opponents | 3-3 | 12-9 | 36-43 | 3-3 | 13-7 | 44-35 | 4-2 | 14-7 | 42-39 | | after a non-conference game | 6-5 | 23-36 | 227-224 | 6-5 | 31-28 | 233-219 | 6-6 | 23-37 | 264-204 | | in non-conference games | 7-5 | 34-26 | 238-215 | 7-5 | 38-21 | 246-213 | 8-5 | 37-24 | 287-182 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 6-10 | 40-48 | 275-289 | 11-5 | 41-47 | 270-297 | 6-11 | 39-52 | 301-279 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 1-4 | 16-14 | 100-85 | 1-4 | 14-16 | 88-97 | 1-4 | 16-15 | 103-87 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 5-1 | 10-12 | 90-87 | 2-4 | 15-7 | 92-82 | 4-2 | 10-12 | 107-73 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 5-10 | 40-53 | 361-357 | 7-8 | 49-45 | 358-363 | 4-12 | 35-62 | 361-381 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 7-7 | 31-37 | 225-212 | 6-8 | 26-42 | 206-230 | 6-8 | 31-39 | 234-217 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-11 | -8.9 | 17-18 | 16-19 | 102.6 | 52.1 | 48.9% | 47.2 | 97.2 | 49.6 | 43.5% | 49.9 | | Road Games | 8-8 | -9 | 6-10 | 7-9 | 98.7 | 50.9 | 47.5% | 48.6 | 99.2 | 49.2 | 43.6% | 50.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 96.6 | 52.0 | 47.3% | 46.2 | 89.0 | 43.6 | 39.6% | 54.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 102.6 | 52.1 | 38-78 | 48.9% | 9-22 | 39.5% | 18-23 | 76.8% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.4 | 49 | 37-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 98.7 | 50.9 | 37-78 | 47.5% | 9-23 | 38.1% | 16-22 | 73.6% | 49 | 9 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.2 | 49.6 | 36-83 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 36.0% | 17-22 | 76.5% | 50 | 12 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 97 | 48.8 | 37-83 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 17-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.2 | 49.2 | 37-84 | 43.6% | 9-23 | 39.9% | 17-22 | 77.1% | 50 | 12 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 20-19 | +1.9 | 19-19 | 18-20 | 98.3 | 48.3 | 44.6% | 51.3 | 98.7 | 49.2 | 45.8% | 49.6 | | Home Games | 11-4 | +6.6 | 10-5 | 6-9 | 101.5 | 53.1 | 45.3% | 53.7 | 95.0 | 48.6 | 42.1% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 97.6 | 49.4 | 45.6% | 46.6 | 99.2 | 47.8 | 49.7% | 47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 98.3 | 48.3 | 36-82 | 44.6% | 6-17 | 37.1% | 19-25 | 76.5% | 51 | 13 | 23 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.9 | 49.2 | 37-83 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 101.5 | 53.1 | 37-81 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 37.6% | 21-27 | 78.9% | 54 | 11 | 23 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 98.7 | 49.2 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 7-17 | 37.8% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.2 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 75.0% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 95.0 | 48.6 | 35-82 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 20-26 | 76.3% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI 95.4, UTAH 96.5 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/6/2012 | NEW YORK | 92-112 | L | -9.5 | L | 199 | O | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 14 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 7 | | 12/8/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 106-90 | W | -14.5 | W | 194 | O | 40-69 | 58.0% | 42 | 16 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 36 | 17 | | 12/10/2012 | ATLANTA | 101-92 | W | -6.5 | W | 197.5 | U | 39-67 | 58.2% | 45 | 14 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 35 | 14 | | 12/12/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 95-97 | L | -8 | L | 206.5 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 45 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | WASHINGTON | 102-72 | W | -15 | W | 196 | U | 40-79 | 50.6% | 51 | 12 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 44 | 21 | | 12/18/2012 | MINNESOTA | 103-92 | W | -8 | W | 200 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 34 | 8 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 66 | 19 | | 12/20/2012 | @ DALLAS | 110-95 | W | -5.5 | W | 203 | O | 42-78 | 53.8% | 56 | 18 | 37-96 | 38.5% | 44 | 9 | | 12/22/2012 | UTAH | 105-89 | W | -7.5 | W | 198.5 | U | 38-73 | 52.1% | 46 | 16 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 40 | 19 | | 12/25/2012 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 103-97 | W | -2.5 | W | 204 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 39 | 13 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 50 | 16 | | 12/26/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 105-92 | W | -9 | W | 200.5 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 50 | 13 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 53 | 16 | | 12/28/2012 | @ DETROIT | 99-109 | L | -6 | L | 189 | O | 39-77 | 50.6% | 36 | 14 | 43-74 | 58.1% | 43 | 14 | | 12/29/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 85-104 | L | -4 | L | 199.5 | U | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | | 12/31/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 112-110 | W | -9.5 | L | 194.5 | O | 40-85 | 47.1% | 47 | 7 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 57 | 16 | | 1/2/2013 | DALLAS | 119-109 | W | -10.5 | L | 204.5 | O | 42-89 | 47.2% | 53 | 9 | 41-94 | 43.6% | 56 | 13 | | 1/4/2013 | CHICAGO | 89-96 | L | -7.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | | 1/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | 99-71 | W | -14 | W | 191.5 | U | 38-82 | 46.3% | 58 | 9 | 29-81 | 35.8% | 46 | 8 | | 1/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | 77-87 | L | -1.5 | L | 187.5 | U | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 14 | 33-91 | 36.3% | 66 | 9 | | 1/10/2013 | @ PORTLAND | 90-92 | L | -3.5 | L | 194.5 | U | 35-77 | 45.5% | 51 | 17 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 54 | 14 | | 1/12/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | 128-99 | W | -7.5 | W | 203.5 | O | 45-80 | 56.2% | 41 | 10 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 51 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/5/2012 | ORLANDO | 87-81 | W | -8 | L | 196.5 | U | 32-77 | 41.6% | 47 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 51 | 19 | | 12/7/2012 | TORONTO | 131-99 | W | -6 | W | 198 | O | 45-91 | 49.5% | 62 | 11 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 45 | 15 | | 12/9/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | 117-110 | W | 7.5 | W | 207.5 | O | 45-83 | 54.2% | 47 | 9 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | | 12/12/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 99-96 | W | 4 | W | 210 | U | 41-84 | 48.8% | 50 | 14 | 37-87 | 42.5% | 53 | 12 | | 12/14/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 84-99 | L | -2 | L | 202.5 | U | 33-82 | 40.2% | 56 | 15 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 49 | 12 | | 12/15/2012 | MEMPHIS | 86-99 | L | -2 | L | 187.5 | U | 31-74 | 41.9% | 45 | 15 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 55 | 12 | | 12/18/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 92-90 | W | 4.5 | W | 193.5 | U | 37-83 | 44.6% | 53 | 15 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 45 | 13 | | 12/19/2012 | @ INDIANA | 84-104 | L | 3.5 | L | 185.5 | O | 32-86 | 37.2% | 60 | 15 | 41-80 | 51.2% | 45 | 15 | | 12/22/2012 | @ MIAMI | 89-105 | L | 7.5 | L | 198.5 | U | 30-73 | 41.1% | 40 | 19 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 46 | 16 | | 12/23/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 97-93 | W | 1.5 | W | 187.5 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 45 | 11 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 54 | 19 | | 12/26/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 83-94 | L | -4 | L | 203 | U | 32-83 | 38.6% | 61 | 14 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 47 | 10 | | 12/28/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 114-116 | L | 3 | W | 191 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 43 | 17 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 44 | 15 | | 12/30/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 96-107 | L | 10.5 | L | 197 | O | 33-80 | 41.2% | 51 | 16 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 52 | 12 | | 1/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | 106-84 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 43-87 | 49.4% | 58 | 12 | 29-84 | 34.5% | 50 | 11 | | 1/4/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 87-80 | W | 1.5 | W | 198 | U | 40-89 | 44.9% | 48 | 10 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 48 | 20 | | 1/5/2013 | @ DENVER | 91-110 | L | 10 | L | 202 | U | 28-78 | 35.9% | 51 | 19 | 39-76 | 51.3% | 56 | 19 | | 1/7/2013 | DALLAS | 100-94 | W | -5 | W | 198.5 | U | 31-77 | 40.3% | 53 | 11 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 49 | 10 | | 1/9/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 112-102 | W | -4.5 | W | 199 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 50 | 16 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 49 | 15 | | 1/11/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 95-103 | L | 5 | L | 193.5 | O | 36-76 | 47.4% | 41 | 16 | 40-72 | 55.6% | 44 | 13 | | 1/12/2013 | @ DETROIT | 90-87 | W | 2.5 | W | 192.5 | U | 36-71 | 50.7% | 38 | 16 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 41 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| MIAMI is 18-13 against the spread versus UTAH since 1996 | | MIAMI is 16-15 straight up against UTAH since 1996 | | 16 of 29 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| UTAH is 2-2 against the spread versus MIAMI over the last 3 seasons | | UTAH is 2-2 straight up against MIAMI over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| MIAMI is 10-6 against the spread versus UTAH since 1996 | | UTAH is 9-7 straight up against MIAMI since 1996 | | 8 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| UTAH is 1-1 against the spread versus MIAMI over the last 3 seasons | | UTAH is 1-1 straight up against MIAMI over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2012 | UTAH | 89 | 198.5 | Under | 43 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 40 | 11 | 19 | | | MIAMI | 105 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 46 | 6 | 16 | 03/02/2012 | MIAMI | 98 | -5 | | 44 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 43 | 8 | 11 | | | UTAH | 99 | 197 | SU ATS | 57 | 38-90 | 42.2% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 60 | 23 | 11 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MIAMI games 49.1% of the time since 1996. (539-558) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MIAMI games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (89-89) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 51.3% of the time since 1996. (566-537) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH games 52.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (79-71) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in MIAMI games 52.6% of the time since 1996. (641-578) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MIAMI games 50.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (103-101) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (619-598) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in UTAH games 55.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (89-72) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 01/12/2013 - Shane Battier "?" Monday vs. Utah ( Hamstring ) | |
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Raja Bell out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [G] 12/27/2012 - Mo Williams out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [F] 01/12/2013 - Marvin Williams "?" Monday vs. Miami ( Knee ) | | [G] 01/14/2013 - Jamaal Tinsley is upgraded to probable Monday vs. Miami ( Illness ) |
|
|