|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-11 | 77-84 | 678-660 | 9-6 | 76-87 | 696-647 | 7-9 | 80-84 | 787-583 | | as an underdog | 2-6 | 41-47 | 259-250 | 5-3 | 42-49 | 261-249 | 1-7 | 32-59 | 180-338 | | as a road underdog of 3 points or less | 0-2 | 8-7 | 47-50 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 53-44 | 0-2 | 8-7 | 44-54 | | in road games | 3-5 | 40-40 | 344-325 | 5-3 | 36-46 | 344-327 | 2-6 | 33-49 | 324-358 | | in a road game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 0-1 | 3-5 | 33-38 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 39-35 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 31-43 | | in November games | 5-10 | 10-18 | 100-107 | 9-5 | 19-9 | 104-101 | 7-8 | 14-15 | 129-83 | | first half of the season | 5-11 | 19-31 | 210-215 | 9-6 | 28-22 | 225-204 | 7-9 | 22-29 | 261-178 | | on Friday nights | 0-4 | 18-18 | 122-135 | 3-1 | 15-21 | 126-128 | 3-1 | 23-13 | 159-102 | | against Atlantic division opponents | 1-0 | 8-8 | 88-83 | 1-0 | 9-7 | 96-76 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 108-67 | | after a non-conference game | 3-6 | 25-32 | 223-225 | 5-3 | 28-28 | 232-210 | 4-5 | 27-30 | 249-204 | | in non-conference games | 3-7 | 29-28 | 221-222 | 6-4 | 29-29 | 232-213 | 4-6 | 31-27 | 281-173 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 2-5 | 38-36 | 259-223 | 5-2 | 34-42 | 246-232 | 2-5 | 42-34 | 304-190 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 2-2 | 24-16 | 122-120 | 3-1 | 19-22 | 121-117 | 2-2 | 25-16 | 138-112 | | after scoring 85 points or less | 1-1 | 4-8 | 61-63 | 1-1 | 3-9 | 62-60 | 2-0 | 6-6 | 67-60 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-0 | 7-14 | 82-83 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 86-76 | 0-0 | 8-14 | 95-73 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-6 | 37-32 | 254-285 | 3-4 | 29-40 | 278-268 | 4-3 | 46-23 | 383-176 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 2-3 | 30-32 | 192-174 | 2-2 | 26-36 | 187-186 | 3-2 | 38-25 | 272-107 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-9 | 79-81 | 624-633 | 9-7 | 74-89 | 625-625 | 3-13 | 48-116 | 534-753 | | as a favorite | 2-1 | 16-17 | 212-221 | 1-2 | 11-22 | 209-227 | 2-1 | 18-15 | 287-155 | | as a home favorite of 3 points or less | 0-1 | 3-8 | 49-53 | 0-1 | 2-9 | 41-61 | 0-1 | 3-8 | 53-49 | | in home games | 3-3 | 37-41 | 298-327 | 3-3 | 36-44 | 307-319 | 2-4 | 31-49 | 322-318 | | in a home game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 1-0 | 4-6 | 44-57 | 1-0 | 7-3 | 55-45 | 0-1 | 3-7 | 54-47 | | in November games | 7-8 | 15-14 | 107-107 | 9-6 | 16-14 | 99-110 | 3-12 | 8-22 | 83-139 | | first half of the season | 7-9 | 23-26 | 213-218 | 9-7 | 27-24 | 210-214 | 3-13 | 15-36 | 177-272 | | on Friday nights | 1-0 | 17-16 | 136-139 | 0-1 | 18-18 | 141-138 | 0-1 | 13-23 | 127-162 | | against Pacific division opponents | 0-0 | 7-8 | 86-81 | 0-0 | 8-7 | 81-84 | 0-0 | 4-11 | 66-108 | | after a non-conference game | 2-4 | 23-29 | 209-211 | 2-4 | 26-27 | 207-210 | 1-5 | 12-42 | 169-266 | | in non-conference games | 3-4 | 26-26 | 204-218 | 5-2 | 25-29 | 215-206 | 1-6 | 17-38 | 169-267 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 2-2 | 29-25 | 169-175 | 2-2 | 25-29 | 177-159 | 1-3 | 20-34 | 142-216 | | after scoring 85 points or less | 0-2 | 16-14 | 112-120 | 2-0 | 12-18 | 112-115 | 0-2 | 10-21 | 94-147 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 2-3 | 26-20 | 129-126 | 3-2 | 18-28 | 120-138 | 1-4 | 17-29 | 95-191 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-3 | 35-37 | 286-281 | 2-4 | 28-44 | 273-290 | 2-4 | 27-46 | 311-280 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 1-1 | 26-29 | 176-183 | 2-0 | 22-34 | 164-198 | 0-2 | 19-37 | 186-185 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 7-9 | -1.7 | 5-11 | 9-6 | 98.4 | 49.8 | 44.3% | 50.7 | 102.6 | 51.3 | 47.1% | 52.6 | | Road Games | 2-6 | -4.1 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 95.2 | 48.9 | 42.9% | 50.7 | 107.0 | 50.2 | 47.4% | 54.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 98.8 | 45.2 | 47.2% | 46.0 | 98.8 | 46.0 | 45.5% | 51.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 98.4 | 49.8 | 39-87 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 15-21 | 73.9% | 51 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 98.1 | 49.4 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-21 | 35.5% | 17-23 | 75.0% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 95.2 | 48.9 | 37-87 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 15-21 | 70.9% | 51 | 12 | 21 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 102.6 | 51.3 | 39-82 | 47.1% | 8-18 | 43.2% | 17-23 | 74.5% | 53 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.9 | 48.3 | 36-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 36.9% | 17-24 | 74.0% | 52 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 107.0 | 50.2 | 40-84 | 47.4% | 8-18 | 46.5% | 19-25 | 76.6% | 55 | 11 | 25 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-13 | -8.2 | 7-9 | 9-7 | 95.9 | 47.8 | 42.2% | 49.7 | 101.5 | 50.6 | 45.9% | 54.6 | | Home Games | 2-4 | -2.4 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 102.0 | 48.7 | 41.6% | 54.8 | 101.0 | 48.2 | 45.2% | 55.3 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 95.2 | 48.6 | 42.1% | 50.2 | 104.0 | 51.6 | 46.0% | 57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 95.9 | 47.8 | 35-84 | 42.2% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 18-23 | 77.0% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 24 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 95.7 | 47.8 | 36-83 | 43.6% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 17-23 | 74.9% | 52 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 102.0 | 48.7 | 39-93 | 41.6% | 8-22 | 37.7% | 16-21 | 76.7% | 55 | 14 | 22 | 23 | 9 | 12 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 101.5 | 50.6 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 38.3% | 20-27 | 75.4% | 55 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.3 | 48 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 18-23 | 76.5% | 52 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 101.0 | 48.2 | 37-82 | 45.2% | 7-18 | 40.2% | 20-26 | 76.8% | 55 | 9 | 22 | 20 | 6 | 17 | 6 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 94.2, TORONTO 95.4 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 10/31/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 85-87 | L | -2 | L | 202 | U | 32-80 | 40.0% | 55 | 18 | 33-86 | 38.4% | 58 | 18 | | 11/2/2012 | DETROIT | 92-89 | W | -4.5 | L | 195 | U | 40-92 | 43.5% | 67 | 12 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 50 | 9 | | 11/4/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 94-115 | L | 0 | L | 193.5 | O | 39-91 | 42.9% | 55 | 16 | 45-92 | 48.9% | 54 | 10 | | 11/5/2012 | @ MIAMI | 99-124 | L | 13 | L | 203 | O | 35-88 | 39.8% | 49 | 11 | 47-86 | 54.7% | 54 | 15 | | 11/7/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 117-110 | W | -2.5 | W | 194 | O | 43-93 | 46.2% | 61 | 12 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 50 | 12 | | 11/9/2012 | CLEVELAND | 107-105 | W | -3 | L | 200.5 | O | 38-81 | 46.9% | 49 | 17 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 47 | 20 | | 11/10/2012 | @ UTAH | 81-94 | L | 8.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 32-87 | 36.8% | 42 | 10 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 65 | 18 | | 11/12/2012 | DENVER | 110-100 | W | 4.5 | W | 203 | O | 43-94 | 45.7% | 50 | 6 | 41-76 | 53.9% | 47 | 15 | | 11/14/2012 | CHICAGO | 106-112 | L | 3 | L | 191.5 | O | 42-105 | 40.0% | 58 | 12 | 44-88 | 50.0% | 57 | 15 | | 11/16/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | 102-114 | L | 9 | L | 201.5 | O | 45-92 | 48.9% | 51 | 15 | 42-89 | 47.2% | 57 | 11 | | 11/17/2012 | MIAMI | 88-97 | L | 6.5 | L | 202 | U | 34-79 | 43.0% | 45 | 16 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 45 | 19 | | 11/21/2012 | PORTLAND | 114-87 | W | -2.5 | W | 201 | P | 46-77 | 59.7% | 40 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 46 | 20 | | 11/23/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 111-108 | W | -5.5 | L | 195.5 | O | 44-90 | 48.9% | 42 | 10 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 52 | 18 | | 11/25/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 101-104 | L | 4 | W | 194.5 | O | 39-83 | 47.0% | 50 | 12 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 43 | 8 | | 11/27/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 91-78 | W | -3 | W | 200 | U | 37-79 | 46.8% | 48 | 15 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 61 | 18 | | 11/28/2012 | @ DETROIT | 77-117 | L | 3 | L | 198 | U | 28-82 | 34.1% | 50 | 19 | 40-76 | 52.6% | 55 | 12 | | 11/30/2012 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2012 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/4/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2012 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2012 | ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/12/2012 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2012 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/31/2012 | INDIANA | 88-90 | L | 1.5 | L | 190 | U | 33-91 | 36.3% | 54 | 10 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 53 | 18 | | 11/3/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-107 | L | 5.5 | L | 194 | O | 37-82 | 45.1% | 46 | 14 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 59 | 17 | | 11/4/2012 | MINNESOTA | 105-86 | W | -3.5 | W | 189.5 | O | 40-90 | 44.4% | 47 | 11 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 24 | | 11/6/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 88-108 | L | 9 | L | 197.5 | U | 30-84 | 35.7% | 46 | 17 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 56 | 17 | | 11/7/2012 | @ DALLAS | 104-109 | L | 7 | W | 197 | O | 36-81 | 44.4% | 48 | 8 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 58 | 11 | | 11/10/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 83-93 | L | -2.5 | L | 185.5 | U | 30-79 | 38.0% | 45 | 12 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 54 | 15 | | 11/12/2012 | UTAH | 133-140 | L | 3 | L | 192.5 | O | 51-108 | 47.2% | 60 | 17 | 46-93 | 49.5% | 60 | 18 | | 11/13/2012 | @ INDIANA | 74-72 | W | 9 | W | 185.5 | U | 26-72 | 36.1% | 51 | 12 | 24-75 | 32.0% | 55 | 12 | | 11/17/2012 | @ BOSTON | 89-107 | L | 7 | L | 187 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 43 | 15 | 43-76 | 56.6% | 44 | 13 | | 11/18/2012 | ORLANDO | 97-86 | W | -4 | W | 187 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 49 | 10 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 53 | 15 | | 11/20/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 98-106 | L | 5.5 | L | 183 | O | 37-82 | 45.1% | 55 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 46 | 8 | | 11/21/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 97-98 | L | 2.5 | W | 193.5 | O | 37-80 | 46.2% | 46 | 14 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 58 | 12 | | 11/23/2012 | @ DETROIT | 90-91 | L | 1.5 | W | 192 | U | 32-78 | 41.0% | 46 | 11 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 58 | 14 | | 11/25/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 106-111 | L | 6 | W | 195.5 | O | 40-110 | 36.4% | 74 | 12 | 44-103 | 42.7% | 63 | 11 | | 11/27/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 101-117 | L | 6 | L | 202.5 | O | 42-86 | 48.8% | 44 | 16 | 44-83 | 53.0% | 47 | 14 | | 11/28/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 82-103 | L | 10.5 | L | 189 | U | 29-74 | 39.2% | 41 | 17 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 60 | 12 | | 11/30/2012 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2012 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2012 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2012 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2012 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/12/2012 | BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2012 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/16/2012 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| TORONTO is 14-13 against the spread versus PHOENIX since 1996 | | PHOENIX is 21-8 straight up against TORONTO since 1996 | | 16 of 28 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 2-1 against the spread versus TORONTO over the last 3 seasons | | PHOENIX is 2-1 straight up against TORONTO over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| PHOENIX is 7-6 against the spread versus TORONTO since 1996 | | PHOENIX is 10-4 straight up against TORONTO since 1996 | | 8 of 14 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 1-0 against the spread versus TORONTO over the last 3 seasons | | PHOENIX is 1-0 straight up against TORONTO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/24/2012 | TORONTO | 99 | 188 | SU ATS | 48 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 52 | 11 | 16 | | | PHOENIX | 96 | -5.5 | Over | 52 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 45 | 8 | 15 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PHOENIX games 51.9% of the time since 1996. (542-503) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PHOENIX games 56.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (72-55) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TORONTO games 49.3% of the time since 1996. (497-511) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TORONTO games 51.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (64-60) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in PHOENIX games 49% of the time since 1996. (593-616) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in PHOENIX games 45.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (67-81) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TORONTO games 50.9% of the time since 1996. (557-537) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TORONTO games 47.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (71-78) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F/C] 10/19/2012 - Channing Frye out for season ( Heart ) | |
| [G/F] 11/12/2012 - Landry Fields out indefinitely ( Elbow ) | | [G/F] 11/12/2012 - Alan Anderson expected to miss 3-6 weeks ( Foot ) | | [F/C] 11/30/2012 - Andrea Bargnani is upgraded to probable Friday vs. Phoenix ( Ankle ) | | [F/C] 11/30/2012 - Amir Johnson "?" Friday vs. Phoenix ( Ankle ) |
|
|