|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| as an underdog of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 2-2 | 3-2 | 31-30 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 31-31 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 16-47 | | in all games | 9-9 | 27-25 | 151-129 | 9-9 | 27-27 | 134-152 | 13-6 | 39-16 | 163-128 | | when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest | 1-0 | 3-1 | 13-6 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 7-12 | 1-0 | 4-0 | 14-5 | | against NFC West division opponents | 0-0 | 2-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 13-6 | | in games played on a grass field | 4-3 | 19-16 | 126-102 | 3-4 | 17-19 | 108-125 | 5-3 | 29-8 | 141-97 | | in games played on a neutral field | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | | in non-conference games | 2-2 | 6-6 | 35-30 | 2-1 | 8-3 | 32-33 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 39-27 | | in playoff games | 3-0 | 5-2 | 13-7 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 7-13 | 3-0 | 5-2 | 13-7 | | in the Super Bowl | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | | after 2 or more consecutive wins | 2-4 | 8-13 | 40-42 | 3-4 | 8-15 | 30-53 | 5-2 | 13-10 | 42-43 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-4 | 14-9 | 60-55 | 4-5 | 11-15 | 54-67 | 5-4 | 17-9 | 50-72 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season | 4-3 | 9-8 | 40-35 | 3-5 | 8-11 | 38-41 | 5-3 | 12-7 | 38-42 | | in all lined games | 9-9 | 27-25 | 151-129 | 9-9 | 27-27 | 134-152 | 13-6 | 39-16 | 163-128 | | as an underdog | 4-4 | 8-6 | 69-62 | 4-3 | 7-7 | 61-73 | 3-5 | 6-9 | 47-90 | | in all games where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points | 9-8 | 14-12 | 35-34 | 8-8 | 14-12 | 36-34 | 12-5 | 18-9 | 32-41 |
|
|
|
|
| as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 6-4 | 14-6 | 59-51 | 4-6 | 9-11 | 57-55 | 7-3 | 16-4 | 84-29 | | in all games | 11-7 | 30-21 | 172-173 | 12-6 | 29-22 | 184-168 | 13-4 | 33-18 | 199-157 | | when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest | 0-0 | 1-1 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 15-5 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 8-13 | | against AFC North division opponents | 0-0 | 3-1 | 10-13 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 10-14 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 12-12 | | in games played on a grass field | 6-4 | 21-14 | 124-133 | 8-2 | 22-13 | 140-123 | 8-1 | 23-12 | 152-112 | | in games played on a neutral field | 0-0 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 2-1 | | in non-conference games | 4-0 | 9-3 | 42-41 | 3-1 | 4-8 | 42-43 | 4-0 | 9-3 | 46-39 | | in playoff games | 2-0 | 3-1 | 10-10 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 13-8 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 12-9 | | in the Super Bowl | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | | after 2 or more consecutive wins | 3-5 | 10-9 | 50-56 | 5-3 | 9-10 | 56-48 | 3-4 | 11-7 | 64-41 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-3 | 12-8 | 64-73 | 5-4 | 9-11 | 66-74 | 7-2 | 12-8 | 65-76 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season | 4-1 | 7-6 | 43-46 | 5-0 | 8-5 | 47-46 | 4-1 | 7-6 | 46-47 | | in all lined games | 11-7 | 30-21 | 172-173 | 12-6 | 29-22 | 184-168 | 13-4 | 33-18 | 199-157 | | as a favorite | 9-6 | 22-16 | 111-96 | 9-6 | 20-17 | 112-99 | 11-3 | 27-10 | 162-50 | | in all games where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points | 6-2 | 11-3 | 82-74 | 6-2 | 10-4 | 76-82 | 6-2 | 10-4 | 95-65 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-6 | +9.3 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 25.7 | 12.3 | 364.0 | (5.8) | 1.0 | 21.1 | 11.2 | 361.0 | (5.3) | 1.7 | | Road Games | 6-4 | +5.6 | 5-4 | 3-6 | 21.0 | 10.3 | 327.0 | (5) | 1.0 | 21.3 | 12.0 | 356.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +6.6 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 30.0 | 12.7 | 425.3 | (6.5) | 1.0 | 19.0 | 13.3 | 415.0 | (5) | 2.7 | | Grass Games | 5-3 | +4 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 20.6 | 11.1 | 320.2 | (5.1) | 1.1 | 22.1 | 12.5 | 367.9 | (5.3) | 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 25.7 | 12.3 | 19.9 | 28:53 | 29-124 | (4.3) | 20-34 | 59.0% | 240 | (7) | 63-364 | (5.8) | (14.2) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.5 | 11 | 19.6 | 30:47 | 27-111 | (4.1) | 21-35 | 60.8% | 230 | (6.7) | 61-341 | (5.6) | (15.2) | | Offense Road Games | 21.0 | 10.3 | 18.6 | 30:22 | 30-128 | (4.2) | 19-34 | 56.9% | 199 | (5.8) | 65-327 | (5) | (15.6) | | Defense (All Games) | 21.1 | 11.2 | 21.5 | 32:55 | 31-123 | (4) | 22-37 | 59.4% | 238 | (6.4) | 68-361 | (5.3) | (17.1) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.7 | 11.6 | 20.8 | 31:41 | 28-113 | (4.1) | 22-36 | 61.7% | 242 | (6.7) | 64-356 | (5.6) | (15) | | Defense Road Games | 21.3 | 12.0 | 21.1 | 33:02 | 33-132 | (4) | 21-35 | 59.4% | 224 | (6.4) | 68-356 | (5.2) | (16.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 13-5 | 37.5% | 1-0 | 40.0% | 4-94 | (26) | 3-26 | (9.7) | 8-69 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 13-5 | 37.9% | 1-0 | 47.5% | 3-69 | (23.3) | 20-2 | (9.5) | 6-56 | | Stats For (Road Games) | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 15-5 | 35.8% | 1-0 | 44.4% | 4-94 | (24) | 3-26 | (9.8) | 7-62 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.7 | | 15-6 | 37.5% | 1-0 | 47.1% | 2-59 | (24.3) | 3-28 | (9.3) | 7-58 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | | 14-5 | 39.1% | 1-0 | 55.4% | 3-64 | (23.4) | 25-2 | (10.2) | 6-53 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | | 15-5 | 37.7% | 1-0 | 57.1% | 2-64 | (25.4) | 3-38 | (11.2) | 6-53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-4 | +3.9 | 11-7 | 12-6 | 26.1 | 11.4 | 374.2 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 18.2 | 9.0 | 307.7 | (5.1) | 1.6 | | Road Games | 6-3 | +0.7 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 25.2 | 11.6 | 348.4 | (6) | 1.2 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 333.8 | (5.1) | 1.9 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 33.3 | 15.0 | 453.0 | (7.2) | 0.7 | 22.7 | 17.0 | 363.7 | (6.4) | 2.0 | | Grass Games | 8-1 | +5.1 | 6-4 | 8-2 | 27.3 | 11.7 | 397.7 | (6.7) | 0.7 | 16.4 | 7.6 | 285.9 | (5) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 26.1 | 11.4 | 20.7 | 31:53 | 31-165 | (5.3) | 18-27 | 66.0% | 210 | (7.7) | 58-374 | (6.4) | (14.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.8 | 11.2 | 19.8 | 30:25 | 27-122 | (4.5) | 21-35 | 59.6% | 227 | (6.6) | 62-350 | (5.6) | (16.1) | | Offense Road Games | 25.2 | 11.6 | 19.4 | 31:05 | 31-148 | (4.8) | 18-27 | 66.4% | 200 | (7.5) | 58-348 | (6) | (13.8) | | Defense (All Games) | 18.2 | 9.0 | 18.4 | 29:45 | 25-94 | (3.8) | 22-36 | 60.6% | 214 | (5.9) | 61-308 | (5.1) | (16.9) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.2 | 11.9 | 19.9 | 30:14 | 27-116 | (4.3) | 21-35 | 61.1% | 228 | (6.6) | 62-344 | (5.6) | (14.9) | | Defense Road Games | 20.7 | 10.3 | 20.8 | 30:32 | 24-82 | (3.4) | 26-41 | 62.2% | 252 | (6.1) | 65-334 | (5.1) | (16.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 12-4 | 36.6% | 1-0 | 66.7% | 3-72 | (24.6) | 2-22 | (10.5) | 7-59 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2 | 13-5 | 38.2% | 1-0 | 48.1% | 3-66 | (23.3) | 20-2 | (9.4) | 6-52 | | Stats For (Road Games) | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 12-4 | 37.7% | 1-0 | 60.0% | 3-77 | (29) | 2-22 | (9.8) | 8-68 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 | | 13-4 | 34.3% | 1-1 | 55.6% | 3-76 | (26.2) | 2-14 | (6.3) | 6-45 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | | 13-5 | 37.9% | 1-0 | 50.0% | 3-62 | (24.1) | 20-2 | (9) | 6-51 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.9 | | 13-5 | 34.7% | 2-1 | 52.9% | 2-64 | (26) | 2-19 | (7.7) | 5-48 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BALTIMORE 20.8, SAN FRANCISCO 22.3 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/9/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 28-31 | L | 2 | L | 48 | O | 35-186 | 16-21-173 | 2 | 35-172 | 17-28-248 | 1 | | 12/16/2012 | DENVER | 17-34 | L | 3 | L | 47.5 | O | 19-56 | 20-40-222 | 2 | 45-163 | 17-28-187 | 0 | | 12/23/2012 | NY GIANTS | 33-14 | W | 3 | W | 47.5 | U | 45-224 | 25-36-309 | 0 | 14-67 | 14-28-119 | 0 | | 12/30/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 17-23 | L | 4.5 | L | 42.5 | U | 46-206 | 19-33-146 | 1 | 21-47 | 15-26-142 | 0 | | 1/6/2013 | INDIANAPOLIS | 24-9 | W | -7 | W | 48 | U | 32-172 | 12-23-269 | 2 | 30-152 | 28-54-267 | 2 | | 1/12/2013 | @ DENVER | 38-35 | W | 9 | W | 44 | O | 39-155 | 18-34-324 | 1 | 41-125 | 28-43-273 | 3 | | 1/20/2013 | @ NEW ENGLAND | 28-13 | W | 8 | W | 49 | U | 33-121 | 21-36-235 | 0 | 28-108 | 29-54-320 | 3 | | 2/3/2013 | *SAN FRANCISCO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/9/2012 | MIAMI | 27-13 | W | -11 | W | 38.5 | O | 28-155 | 18-23-166 | 0 | 22-94 | 17-33-133 | 1 | | 12/16/2012 | @ NEW ENGLAND | 41-34 | W | 4 | W | 47.5 | O | 39-180 | 14-25-203 | 2 | 24-95 | 36-65-425 | 4 | | 12/23/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 13-42 | L | 3 | L | 40.5 | O | 19-82 | 19-36-231 | 2 | 39-176 | 15-22-170 | 1 | | 12/30/2012 | ARIZONA | 27-13 | W | -16 | L | 38.5 | O | 37-129 | 17-29-278 | 0 | 17-55 | 19-34-207 | 2 | | 1/12/2013 | GREEN BAY | 45-31 | W | -3 | W | 45 | O | 43-323 | 17-31-256 | 1 | 16-104 | 26-39-248 | 2 | | 1/20/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 28-24 | W | -3.5 | W | 48 | O | 29-149 | 16-21-224 | 1 | 23-81 | 30-42-396 | 2 | | 2/3/2013 | *BALTIMORE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| SAN FRANCISCO is 2-2 against the spread versus BALTIMORE since 1992 | | BALTIMORE is 3-1 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO since 1992 | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| BALTIMORE is 1-0 against the spread versus SAN FRANCISCO over the last 3 seasons | | BALTIMORE is 1-0 straight up against SAN FRANCISCO over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/24/2011 | SAN FRANCISCO | 6 | 40.5 | Under | 3 | 12 | 28:52 | 21-74 | 15-24 | 96 | 0 | 1 | 7-97 | | | BALTIMORE | 16 | -3 | SU ATS | 6 | 16 | 31:08 | 35-92 | 15-23 | 161 | 0 | 0 | 3-20 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 53.7% of the time since 1992. (115-99) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 73% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (27-10) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN FRANCISCO games 53.6% of the time since 1992. (142-123) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SAN FRANCISCO games 52.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-17) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 56.3% of the time since 1992. (134-104) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 59.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (29-20) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SAN FRANCISCO games 48.5% of the time since 1992. (142-151) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SAN FRANCISCO games 46.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-22) | |
|
|
|
|
| [DB] 12/27/2012 - Emanuel Cook IR ( Leg ) | | [T] 01/11/2013 - Jah Reid IR ( Toe ) | | [LB] 12/27/2012 - Jameel McClain IR ( Neck ) | | [WR] 12/27/2012 - LaQuan Williams IR ( Ankle ) | | [CB] 12/27/2012 - Lardarius Webb IR ( Knee ) | | [DE] 12/27/2012 - Ryan McBean IR ( Ankle ) | |
| [LB] 01/25/2013 - Ahmad Brooks probable Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Shoulder ) | | [G] 12/27/2012 - Brandon Jacobs out indefinitely ( Suspension ) | | [TE] 12/27/2012 - Demarcus Dobbs IR ( Knee ) | | [CB] 12/27/2012 - Kendall Hunter IR ( Achilles ) | | [NT] 12/27/2012 - Kyle Williams IR ( Knee ) | | [WR] 12/27/2012 - Mario Manningham IR ( Knee ) |
|
|