|
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
---|
|
|
|
TULSA | |  | MINNESOTA | -9 | |
|
|
|
All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
in all games | 7-3 | 39-36 | 51-58 | 5-5 | 35-42 | 53-58 | 3-7 | 15-63 | 21-91 | as an underdog | 6-2 | 35-34 | 46-53 | 3-5 | 31-40 | 48-53 | 2-6 | 11-61 | 16-86 | as a road underdog of 12.5 to 18 points | 1-1 | 11-9 | 13-13 | 1-1 | 6-15 | 9-18 | 0-2 | 2-19 | 2-25 | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 1-1 | 11-9 | 13-13 | 1-1 | 6-15 | 9-18 | 0-2 | 2-19 | 2-25 | as a road underdog of 15.5 to 18 points | 1-1 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 0-2 | 0-11 | 0-11 | in road games | 3-2 | 19-18 | 26-28 | 2-3 | 14-25 | 24-32 | 1-4 | 5-34 | 7-49 | in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 | 2-2 | 16-14 | 23-24 | 2-2 | 11-21 | 21-28 | 0-4 | 3-29 | 5-44 | in June games | 6-1 | 15-11 | 17-19 | 3-4 | 14-13 | 21-16 | 3-4 | 6-21 | 7-30 | in May, June, or July games | 7-3 | 23-21 | 30-39 | 5-5 | 19-26 | 33-37 | 3-7 | 7-39 | 11-60 | on Sunday games | 1-1 | 7-10 | 8-13 | 2-0 | 5-12 | 6-15 | 0-2 | 4-13 | 5-16 | when playing on back-to-back days | 1-0 | 4-3 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 1-7 | 1-13 | vs. division opponents | 5-0 | 25-22 | 33-36 | 2-3 | 23-25 | 34-36 | 2-3 | 8-41 | 12-59 | after a division game | 4-0 | 25-20 | 33-34 | 1-3 | 19-28 | 31-38 | 1-3 | 8-39 | 11-58 | revenging a home loss versus opponent | 1-0 | 14-15 | 17-21 | 0-1 | 10-19 | 16-22 | 1-0 | 4-26 | 5-34 | revenging a loss versus opponent | 4-0 | 34-29 | 43-38 | 0-4 | 26-38 | 35-47 | 2-2 | 12-53 | 16-67 | after a win by 10 points or more | 0-0 | 3-4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 1-9 | after scoring 75 points or more | 3-2 | 16-15 | 23-27 | 3-2 | 17-16 | 26-26 | 2-3 | 8-25 | 11-41 | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 1-0 | 4-5 | 4-8 | 1-0 | 4-6 | 6-7 | 1-0 | 2-8 | 2-11 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 3-1 | 19-21 | 22-29 | 2-2 | 17-24 | 23-29 | 2-2 | 6-35 | 7-45 | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game | 3-0 | 17-11 | 24-22 | 2-1 | 11-19 | 22-26 | 2-1 | 9-22 | 11-38 | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 2-0 | 19-18 | 24-27 | 1-1 | 16-23 | 24-29 | 1-1 | 7-33 | 9-45 |
|
|
|
|
in all games | 4-3 | 52-39 | 242-246 | 2-5 | 45-47 | 242-250 | 5-2 | 71-21 | 238-259 | as a favorite | 4-2 | 42-34 | 113-117 | 2-4 | 40-37 | 121-108 | 5-1 | 61-16 | 146-87 | as a home favorite of 12.5 to 18 points | 1-0 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 9-0 | 9-0 | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 1-0 | 6-4 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 1-0 | 10-0 | 10-0 | as a home favorite of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 6-0 | 6-0 | in home games | 3-0 | 29-17 | 124-121 | 1-2 | 24-23 | 125-121 | 3-0 | 42-5 | 145-104 | in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 | 3-0 | 22-12 | 60-46 | 1-2 | 20-15 | 58-49 | 3-0 | 31-4 | 69-39 | in June games | 4-3 | 14-11 | 82-62 | 2-5 | 12-13 | 68-79 | 5-2 | 19-6 | 79-69 | in May, June, or July games | 4-3 | 24-19 | 163-167 | 2-5 | 23-20 | 166-166 | 5-2 | 33-10 | 155-181 | on Sunday games | 0-0 | 13-11 | 46-47 | 0-0 | 14-10 | 46-45 | 0-0 | 16-8 | 46-47 | vs. division opponents | 3-2 | 33-26 | 150-165 | 1-4 | 29-30 | 161-154 | 4-1 | 47-12 | 149-170 | after a division game | 1-3 | 30-28 | 143-166 | 1-3 | 28-30 | 157-153 | 2-2 | 44-14 | 144-170 | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 0-1 | 3-2 | 20-31 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 25-26 | 0-1 | 4-1 | 17-35 | after allowing 75 points or more | 1-1 | 24-15 | 107-97 | 1-1 | 16-23 | 102-105 | 1-1 | 31-8 | 98-111 | after a loss by 10 points or more | 0-0 | 4-3 | 52-63 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 64-54 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 46-73 | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-0 | 3-1 | 14-20 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 19-16 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 17-18 | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-1 | 22-13 | 89-111 | 1-1 | 14-21 | 102-95 | 2-0 | 32-3 | 102-99 | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game | 1-1 | 26-13 | 53-53 | 0-2 | 16-24 | 55-54 | 2-0 | 35-5 | 61-49 | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 1-1 | 28-21 | 64-57 | 0-2 | 24-26 | 64-59 | 1-1 | 36-14 | 61-63 |
|
|
|
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
---|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-7 | -1.2 | 7-3 | 5-5 | 80.6 | 38.4 | 40.0% | 40.8 | 83.2 | 39.5 | 46.8% | 45.8 | Road Games | 1-4 | +0.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 72.8 | 35.0 | 37.7% | 39.6 | 80.4 | 38.4 | 48.2% | 43.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 84.2 | 38.6 | 41.6% | 40.2 | 82.2 | 38.8 | 45.1% | 47.0 | Division Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 81.0 | 37.2 | 42.4% | 39.4 | 79.0 | 36.8 | 45.0% | 43.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 38.4 | 27-69 | 40.0% | 7-20 | 36.6% | 18-22 | 80.8% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.7 | 39.1 | 28-69 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 77.7% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 35.0 | 24-65 | 37.7% | 5-18 | 29.2% | 19-22 | 84.7% | 40 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 17 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.2 | 39.5 | 32-67 | 46.8% | 5-16 | 32.3% | 15-20 | 74.0% | 46 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 78.9 | 39.7 | 30-67 | 44.4% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 38.4 | 32-67 | 48.2% | 4-14 | 26.4% | 12-16 | 72.0% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 10 | 17 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-2 | -5.5 | 4-3 | 2-5 | 82.6 | 40.9 | 43.8% | 49.0 | 77.1 | 39.0 | 40.6% | 41.3 | Home Games | 3-0 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 92.0 | 49.0 | 46.3% | 47.3 | 75.0 | 36.0 | 38.3% | 42.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -7.5 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 77.8 | 34.8 | 42.3% | 49.8 | 77.4 | 40.2 | 41.5% | 39.8 | Division Games | 4-1 | +2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 81.6 | 39.6 | 43.6% | 48.2 | 76.2 | 38.2 | 40.1% | 40.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.6 | 40.9 | 32-72 | 43.8% | 5-13 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 76.3% | 49 | 14 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.1 | 40.3 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.0 | 49.0 | 34-73 | 46.3% | 6-13 | 45.0% | 19-22 | 84.8% | 47 | 14 | 23 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.1 | 39.0 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79.3 | 39 | 29-68 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.0 | 36.0 | 27-71 | 38.3% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 42 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 69.7, MINNESOTA 66.4 |
|
|
Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
---|
|
|
|
|
5/25/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 81-98 | L | 8.5 | L | 156.5 | O | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 22 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 44 | 15 | 5/27/2013 | WASHINGTON | 90-95 | L | -6.5 | L | 157 | O | 32-74 | 43.2% | 44 | 15 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 50 | 14 | 5/31/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 76-78 | L | 6.5 | W | 158.5 | U | 22-75 | 29.3% | 51 | 16 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 47 | 24 | 6/2/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 71-92 | L | 16.5 | L | 162.5 | O | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 12 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 48 | 14 | 6/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-58 | W | 7.5 | W | 148.5 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 42 | 13 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 10 | 6/8/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-76 | L | 18 | W | 168 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | 6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 74-83 | L | 10.5 | W | 162 | U | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | PHOENIX | 103-108 | L | 6 | W | 169 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 42 | 10 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | 6/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 83-74 | W | 6 | W | 160 | U | 27-70 | 38.6% | 46 | 9 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 51 | 15 | 6/22/2013 | SEATTLE | 92-70 | W | -4.5 | W | 147 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 14 | 6/23/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 90-74 | W | -11 | W | 167.5 | U | 37-74 | 50.0% | 47 | 10 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 47 | 14 | 6/6/2013 | PHOENIX | 99-79 | W | -10.5 | W | 171 | O | 36-81 | 44.4% | 47 | 6 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 11 | 6/8/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -12 | L | 157 | O | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | 6/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 87-72 | W | -14 | W | 160.5 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 48 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 12 | 6/14/2013 | @ TULSA | 83-74 | W | -10.5 | L | 162 | U | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 6/19/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 80-69 | W | -3.5 | W | 178.5 | U | 32-74 | 43.2% | 54 | 10 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 32 | 8 | 6/21/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-87 | L | 3.5 | L | 165 | U | 22-63 | 34.9% | 39 | 16 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 55 | 14 | 6/23/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
---|
|
|
MINNESOTA is 21-13 against the spread versus TULSA since 1997 | MINNESOTA is 23-11 straight up against TULSA since 1997 | 19 of 34 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 5-5 against the spread versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons | MINNESOTA is 10-0 straight up against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
MINNESOTA is 10-7 against the spread versus TULSA since 1997 | MINNESOTA is 14-3 straight up against TULSA since 1997 | 9 of 17 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
TULSA is 3-2 against the spread versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | MINNESOTA is 5-0 straight up against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/14/2013 | MINNESOTA | 83 | -10.5 | SU Under | 39 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 53 | 15 | 13 | | TULSA | 74 | 162 | ATS | 35 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 37 | 13 | 5 | 8/31/2012 | TULSA | 83 | 164 | ATS | 56 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 34 | 6 | 9 | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -18 | SU Over | 48 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 48 | 18 | 9 | 8/19/2012 | TULSA | 59 | 170 | Under | 39 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-25 | 24.0% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 37 | 10 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 83 | -17 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 8-15 | 53.3% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 48 | 7 | 19 | 7/12/2012 | TULSA | 74 | 168 | ATS | 38 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 25-30 | 83.3% | 44 | 12 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 89 | -17.5 | SU Under | 55 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 54 | 11 | 19 | 7/10/2012 | MINNESOTA | 107 | -12.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 41-59 | 69.5% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 32 | 5 | 16 | | TULSA | 86 | 164 | Over | 46 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 11-24 | 45.8% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 26 | 8 | 17 | 6/9/2012 | MINNESOTA | 93 | -13.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 34-60 | 56.7% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 35 | 7 | 16 | | TULSA | 73 | 153 | Over | 42 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 10-23 | 43.5% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 34 | 9 | 18 |
|
|
|
Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
---|
|
|
The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TULSA games 51.9% of the time since 1997. (189-175) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TULSA games 62.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (41-25) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 51% of the time since 1997. (182-175) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MINNESOTA games 47.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-43) | |
|
The betting public is correct when moving the total in TULSA games 44.7% of the time since 1997. (160-198) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TULSA games 44.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (30-37) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MINNESOTA games 47.4% of the time since 1997. (157-174) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MINNESOTA games 52.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (44-40) | |
|
|
|
|
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|