|
|
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
---|
|
|
|
All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
in all games | 7-5 | 33-30 | 161-145 | 1-0 | 22-28 | 96-95 | 13-6 | 52-30 | 183-277 | in all lined games | 7-5 | 33-30 | 161-145 | 1-0 | 22-28 | 96-95 | 9-4 | 39-25 | 120-188 | as an underdog | 1-1 | 11-12 | 112-88 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 61-47 | 0-2 | 9-14 | 49-152 | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 5-1 | 22-4 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 16-10 | in road games | 2-2 | 15-14 | 99-53 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 50-45 | 2-4 | 20-18 | 70-156 | in road lined games | 2-2 | 15-14 | 99-53 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 50-45 | 1-3 | 14-15 | 47-106 | against conference opponents | 3-3 | 25-21 | 128-109 | 1-0 | 18-23 | 74-74 | 5-2 | 31-16 | 113-186 | in January games | 3-2 | 13-10 | 65-50 | 1-0 | 10-9 | 32-40 | 4-1 | 18-5 | 64-86 | after a conference game | 3-1 | 26-19 | 117-105 | 1-0 | 16-24 | 71-72 | 5-1 | 31-16 | 116-182 | off a win against a conference rival | 2-1 | 17-12 | 50-43 | 1-0 | 12-15 | 35-38 | 3-1 | 20-10 | 47-52 | after allowing 60 points or less | 2-3 | 13-11 | 31-20 | 1-0 | 11-9 | 22-17 | 5-4 | 21-11 | 37-47 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-1 | 13-11 | 73-66 | 1-0 | 11-9 | 45-41 | 5-3 | 16-14 | 50-143 | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 1-0 | 9-5 | 45-37 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 28-24 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 29-76 | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 5-3 | 9-11 | 1-0 | 6-2 | 11-6 | 1-0 | 5-3 | 7-13 | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 3-0 | 8-8 | 20-23 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 19-15 | 3-1 | 9-9 | 15-37 | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 2-0 | 6-5 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 6-4 | 16-13 | 2-0 | 9-2 | 25-13 | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 4-1 | 12-8 | 32-28 | 1-0 | 8-8 | 24-20 | 7-0 | 20-5 | 52-35 |
|
|
|
|
in all games | 6-9 | 35-38 | 169-173 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 10-9 | 57-32 | 248-228 | in all lined games | 6-9 | 35-38 | 169-173 | 2-0 | 26-34 | 115-108 | 9-9 | 46-32 | 179-177 | as a favorite | 3-4 | 25-27 | 87-87 | 0-0 | 18-29 | 57-60 | 6-2 | 39-16 | 129-54 | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-1 | 6-4 | 15-19 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 17-17 | in all home games | 2-2 | 15-14 | 65-77 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 2-2 | 28-9 | 123-78 | in home lined games | 2-2 | 15-14 | 65-77 | 0-0 | 11-15 | 50-43 | 2-2 | 21-9 | 85-60 | against conference opponents | 2-5 | 24-23 | 125-111 | 2-0 | 18-26 | 81-78 | 2-5 | 33-16 | 169-135 | in January games | 1-4 | 9-12 | 54-60 | 2-0 | 10-9 | 40-32 | 1-4 | 13-9 | 75-72 | after a conference game | 2-4 | 23-22 | 116-112 | 2-0 | 20-22 | 81-74 | 2-4 | 32-16 | 161-142 | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 2-2 | 5-6 | 31-41 | 1-0 | 3-5 | 22-21 | 2-2 | 8-4 | 45-55 | off a loss against a conference rival | 1-3 | 6-9 | 44-46 | 2-0 | 4-9 | 33-28 | 1-3 | 9-6 | 51-44 | after allowing 80 points or more | 1-1 | 1-3 | 29-23 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 11-17 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 51-49 | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 1-1 | 5-3 | 21-13 | 1-0 | 4-3 | 11-13 | 1-2 | 8-3 | 24-13 | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-1 | 0-2 | 14-19 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 13-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 26-22 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 3-4 | 17-19 | 78-88 | 2-0 | 18-13 | 63-52 | 3-4 | 17-22 | 83-136 | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 0-2 | 11-11 | 46-53 | 2-0 | 13-10 | 41-38 | 0-2 | 10-13 | 49-75 | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-1 | 3-4 | 6-5 | 1-0 | 5-3 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 8-5 | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 1-2 | 7-8 | 17-21 | 1-0 | 8-6 | 16-15 | 1-2 | 9-9 | 24-29 |
|
|
|
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
---|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-6 | +4 | 7-5 | 1-0 | 65.3 | 33.2 | 42.3% | 36.4 | 60.9 | 28.3 | 40.3% | 33.3 | Road Games | 5-4 | +1.4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 61.3 | 31.1 | 38.8% | 37.1 | 62.8 | 29.3 | 40.8% | 35.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 1-0 | 67.4 | 34.2 | 45.0% | 34.2 | 60.6 | 28.4 | 41.1% | 32.6 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +1 | 3-3 | 1-0 | 65.6 | 32.4 | 44.5% | 34.3 | 60.0 | 27.4 | 41.2% | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.3 | 33.2 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 4-14 | 27.8% | 15-21 | 69.9% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 61.3 | 31.1 | 22-56 | 38.8% | 4-15 | 23.9% | 14-21 | 67.9% | 37 | 12 | 9 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.9 | 28.3 | 22-54 | 40.3% | 4-15 | 27.3% | 13-21 | 62.3% | 33 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 65.4 | 30 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 66.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 62.8 | 29.3 | 22-53 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 29.3% | 15-23 | 66.0% | 35 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | +2.1 | 6-9 | 2-0 | 63.4 | 30.7 | 43.8% | 33.0 | 62.8 | 30.7 | 41.1% | 33.9 | Home Games | 2-2 | -2.4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 62.5 | 28.5 | 44.0% | 35.0 | 59.5 | 29.7 | 38.3% | 32.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.2 | 1-4 | 2-0 | 65.6 | 32.2 | 44.4% | 37.8 | 66.0 | 30.6 | 38.4% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -4.4 | 2-5 | 2-0 | 64.0 | 31.4 | 43.5% | 36.7 | 64.1 | 31.7 | 39.6% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.4 | 30.7 | 24-54 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 10-16 | 65.9% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.4 | 31.7 | 24-57 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 62.5 | 28.5 | 23-52 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 32.0% | 11-18 | 62.0% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.8 | 30.7 | 21-51 | 41.1% | 4-14 | 32.0% | 16-23 | 70.6% | 34 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.9 | 24-57 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 70.2% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.5 | 29.7 | 19-50 | 38.3% | 4-14 | 32.1% | 16-22 | 75.0% | 33 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: LOYOLA-MD 66.8, FAIRFIELD 70.5 |
|
|
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
---|
|
|
FAIRFIELD is 15-12 against the spread versus LOYOLA-MD since 1997 | FAIRFIELD is 24-12 straight up against LOYOLA-MD since 1997 | 13 of 19 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
LOYOLA-MD is 4-2 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD over the last 3 seasons | LOYOLA-MD is 4-2 straight up against FAIRFIELD over the last 3 seasons | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
LOYOLA-MD is 6-5 against the spread versus FAIRFIELD since 1997 | FAIRFIELD is 11-5 straight up against LOYOLA-MD since 1997 | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
FAIRFIELD is 1-1 against the spread versus LOYOLA-MD over the last 3 seasons | FAIRFIELD is 1-1 straight up against LOYOLA-MD over the last 3 seasons | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/11/2013 | FAIRFIELD | 58 | 118 | Over | 33 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 35 | 17 | 13 | | LOYOLA-MD | 63 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 27 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 0-8 | 0.0% | 25-34 | 73.5% | 39 | 13 | 15 | 3/5/2012 | FAIRFIELD | 44 | -2.5 | Under | 30 | 15-52 | 28.8% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 39 | 11 | 13 | N | LOYOLA-MD | 48 | 121.5 | SU ATS | 26 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 31 | 6 | 11 | 2/12/2012 | FAIRFIELD | 68 | 126.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 24-44 | 54.5% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 13-22 | 59.1% | 33 | 7 | 14 | | LOYOLA-MD | 51 | -3.5 | Under | 27 | 13-46 | 28.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 22-29 | 75.9% | 26 | 6 | 12 | 1/13/2012 | LOYOLA-MD | 66 | 128 | SU ATS | 29 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 34 | 11 | 20 | | FAIRFIELD | 63 | -5 | Over | 35 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 31 | 13 | 15 | 1/14/2011 | FAIRFIELD | 65 | -5.5 | Over | 35 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 29 | 5 | 15 | | LOYOLA-MD | 66 | 127.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 31 | 8 | 14 |
|
|
|
Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
---|
|
|
The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-MD games 47.2% of the time since 1997. (116-130) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOYOLA-MD games 49% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (25-26) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 49.4% of the time since 1997. (134-137) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in FAIRFIELD games 52.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (32-29) | |
No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
No significant injuries. | |
[F/C] 11/23/2012 - Vincent Van Nes out for season ( Toe ) |
|
|