|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 16-23 | 88-119 | 713-770 | 20-18 | 103-104 | 748-723 | 17-22 | 124-85 | 972-539 | | in road games | 6-11 | 44-57 | 360-377 | 10-7 | 51-50 | 364-367 | 5-12 | 50-52 | 400-351 | | in January games | 3-6 | 16-25 | 106-117 | 4-4 | 18-22 | 118-105 | 2-7 | 22-19 | 139-90 | | against Central division opponents | 3-2 | 9-11 | 96-104 | 0-5 | 6-14 | 84-116 | 3-2 | 10-10 | 134-72 | | in non-conference games | 5-9 | 25-37 | 239-242 | 4-10 | 20-41 | 230-255 | 8-6 | 38-24 | 322-174 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 9-12 | 55-61 | 413-430 | 11-9 | 60-56 | 407-434 | 8-13 | 65-53 | 507-358 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 15-23 | 113-94 | 695-679 | 16-23 | 92-117 | 684-693 | 23-16 | 146-63 | 690-705 | | in home games | 5-17 | 53-54 | 340-353 | 6-16 | 42-66 | 320-374 | 11-11 | 81-27 | 422-281 | | in January games | 5-4 | 26-17 | 128-111 | 6-4 | 22-23 | 118-123 | 7-3 | 34-11 | 132-111 | | against Pacific division opponents | 1-4 | 11-10 | 82-93 | 1-4 | 9-12 | 77-101 | 2-3 | 14-7 | 76-105 | | after a non-conference game | 5-8 | 38-23 | 240-207 | 6-7 | 25-36 | 227-220 | 9-4 | 46-15 | 221-234 | | in non-conference games | 2-12 | 31-31 | 212-236 | 3-11 | 26-36 | 218-232 | 4-10 | 39-23 | 198-258 | | after allowing 85 points or less | 3-6 | 37-33 | 133-148 | 4-5 | 26-44 | 135-144 | 5-4 | 47-23 | 155-128 | | after scoring 85 points or less | 3-4 | 17-14 | 168-150 | 5-3 | 16-16 | 161-157 | 5-3 | 20-12 | 132-192 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 4-7 | 52-45 | 318-288 | 5-7 | 48-50 | 311-299 | 7-5 | 78-20 | 365-254 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 5-6 | 34-31 | 196-179 | 5-6 | 26-39 | 168-209 | 5-6 | 46-19 | 226-156 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 6-6 | 37-29 | 186-184 | 4-8 | 26-41 | 163-205 | 6-6 | 44-23 | 181-195 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-22 | -19.7 | 16-23 | 20-18 | 103.1 | 52.8 | 45.6% | 55.3 | 101.4 | 52.3 | 45.0% | 51.7 | | Road Games | 5-12 | -9.2 | 6-11 | 10-7 | 104.9 | 51.9 | 45.3% | 53.5 | 106.9 | 54.6 | 46.9% | 50.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 3-2 | 0-4 | 102.6 | 50.4 | 46.9% | 52.4 | 100.8 | 51.4 | 44.6% | 53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 103.1 | 52.8 | 37-82 | 45.6% | 9-25 | 35.7% | 20-28 | 69.1% | 55 | 12 | 22 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 98.3 | 49.4 | 37-83 | 44.8% | 7-21 | 35.6% | 17-23 | 75.7% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 104.9 | 51.9 | 37-82 | 45.3% | 10-27 | 36.6% | 21-29 | 73.1% | 54 | 12 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 101.4 | 52.3 | 39-87 | 45.0% | 8-22 | 35.4% | 16-21 | 72.3% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 23 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.8 | 49.4 | 37-83 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 106.9 | 54.6 | 40-86 | 46.9% | 9-22 | 40.6% | 17-23 | 74.8% | 50 | 12 | 24 | 23 | 8 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 23-16 | -7.5 | 15-23 | 16-23 | 93.8 | 46.5 | 43.9% | 52.6 | 91.7 | 44.5 | 42.9% | 49.7 | | Home Games | 11-11 | -18.1 | 5-17 | 6-16 | 91.5 | 45.4 | 42.4% | 53.3 | 89.1 | 44.2 | 42.3% | 50.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 93.4 | 44.2 | 41.4% | 57.4 | 88.8 | 39.2 | 41.0% | 54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 93.8 | 46.5 | 35-81 | 43.9% | 5-13 | 35.4% | 18-23 | 78.4% | 53 | 12 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.3 | 48.9 | 37-81 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 91.5 | 45.4 | 35-82 | 42.4% | 5-13 | 38.4% | 17-22 | 78.5% | 53 | 13 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.7 | 44.5 | 35-81 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 16-22 | 74.9% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.9 | 48.8 | 37-83 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 16-22 | 75.3% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.1 | 44.2 | 34-80 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 16-21 | 76.0% | 50 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 7 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LA LAKERS 96.1, CHICAGO 95.2 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 12/13/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 107-116 | L | 5.5 | L | 205.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 55 | 13 | 42-79 | 53.2% | 45 | 6 | | 12/14/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 102-96 | W | -6.5 | L | 199.5 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 13 | 36-83 | 43.4% | 53 | 19 | | 12/16/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 111-98 | W | -3.5 | W | 196.5 | O | 39-80 | 48.7% | 47 | 14 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 46 | 17 | | 12/18/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 101-100 | W | -12.5 | L | 206.5 | U | 35-88 | 39.8% | 57 | 11 | 38-95 | 40.0% | 67 | 10 | | 12/22/2012 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 118-115 | W | -2 | W | 215 | O | 49-107 | 45.8% | 64 | 20 | 46-103 | 44.7% | 56 | 19 | | 12/25/2012 | NEW YORK | 100-94 | W | -4 | W | 210.5 | U | 37-77 | 48.1% | 53 | 11 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 55 | 10 | | 12/26/2012 | @ DENVER | 114-126 | L | 3.5 | L | 212.5 | O | 41-83 | 49.4% | 52 | 14 | 45-94 | 47.9% | 56 | 10 | | 12/28/2012 | PORTLAND | 104-87 | W | -9 | W | 206 | U | 40-86 | 46.5% | 62 | 11 | 36-87 | 41.4% | 50 | 9 | | 1/1/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 99-103 | L | -9 | L | 200 | O | 37-94 | 39.4% | 60 | 7 | 41-86 | 47.7% | 60 | 10 | | 1/4/2013 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 102-107 | L | 4.5 | L | 206.5 | O | 35-76 | 46.1% | 47 | 12 | 41-82 | 50.0% | 51 | 15 | | 1/6/2013 | DENVER | 105-112 | L | -5.5 | L | 214 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 60 | 18 | 44-101 | 43.6% | 57 | 8 | | 1/8/2013 | @ HOUSTON | 112-125 | L | 8.5 | L | 223.5 | O | 43-91 | 47.3% | 43 | 16 | 48-87 | 55.2% | 50 | 18 | | 1/9/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 105-108 | L | 13.5 | W | 214 | U | 44-95 | 46.3% | 51 | 9 | 41-84 | 48.8% | 51 | 18 | | 1/11/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 101-116 | L | 6.5 | L | 217 | P | 39-98 | 39.8% | 55 | 12 | 44-87 | 50.6% | 61 | 17 | | 1/13/2013 | CLEVELAND | 113-93 | W | -10 | W | 209.5 | U | 40-69 | 58.0% | 46 | 22 | 39-95 | 41.1% | 47 | 16 | | 1/15/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 104-88 | W | -6 | W | 212.5 | U | 42-84 | 50.0% | 53 | 8 | 34-95 | 35.8% | 67 | 11 | | 1/17/2013 | MIAMI | 90-99 | L | -2.5 | L | 207 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 57 | 20 | 40-83 | 48.2% | 43 | 6 | | 1/20/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 110-106 | W | 6 | W | 188 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 62 | 16 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 45 | 10 | | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 75-92 | L | 4 | L | 184 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 38 | 15 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 48 | 16 | | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | 97-120 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 186 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-104 | L | -6 | L | 190 | O | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 15 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 55 | 16 | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 108-101 | W | 4.5 | W | 193.5 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 49 | 18 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 49 | 12 | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | 81-97 | L | -8.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 32-88 | 36.4% | 48 | 10 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 57 | 17 | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | 97-58 | W | -4.5 | W | 183.5 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 67 | 13 | 24-82 | 29.3% | 47 | 14 | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | 107-105 | W | -4.5 | L | 183 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 60 | 14 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 53 | 12 | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | 100-99 | W | 2.5 | W | 181.5 | O | 36-75 | 48.0% | 54 | 21 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 55 | 11 | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | 82-85 | L | 2 | L | 175 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 58 | 15 | 34-84 | 40.5% | 61 | 12 | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 15-14 against the spread versus LA LAKERS since 1996 | | LA LAKERS is 19-10 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 18 of 28 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-1 against the spread versus LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 2-1 straight up against LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 7-7 against the spread versus LA LAKERS since 1996 | | CHICAGO is 7-7 straight up against LA LAKERS since 1996 | | 9 of 14 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 1-0 against the spread versus LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 1-0 straight up against LA LAKERS over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/25/2011 | CHICAGO | 88 | -5 | SU Under | 56 | 36-89 | 40.4% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 52 | 16 | 14 | | | LA LAKERS | 87 | 182.5 | ATS | 49 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 55 | 12 | 17 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
| No line has been posted for this game. |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Steve Blake out indefinitely ( Abdominal ) | | [C] 01/11/2013 - Jordan Hill out for season ( Hip ) | | [C] 01/20/2013 - Dwight Howard has been ejected from the game ( None ) | |
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [F] 01/20/2013 - Luol Deng "?" Monday vs. LA Lakers ( Hamstring ) | | [C] 01/20/2013 - Joakim Noah probable Monday vs. LA Lakers ( Undisclosed ) |
|
|