|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA | -7 | | | THE CITADEL | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 6-5 | 27-33 | 149-170 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 6-9 | 33-46 | 249-228 | | in all lined games | 6-5 | 27-33 | 149-170 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 3-8 | 21-40 | 152-173 | | as a favorite | 1-1 | 9-10 | 72-78 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 46-47 | 1-1 | 12-7 | 105-47 | | as a road favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-3 | | in road games | 4-0 | 14-16 | 67-76 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 45-49 | 2-3 | 8-27 | 65-131 | | in road lined games | 4-0 | 14-16 | 67-76 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 45-49 | 1-3 | 6-25 | 47-100 | | against conference opponents | 1-1 | 18-21 | 104-121 | 0-0 | 19-18 | 79-81 | 1-1 | 18-22 | 151-134 | | in January games | 2-0 | 11-8 | 53-52 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 35-38 | 1-1 | 10-10 | 78-60 | | after a conference game | 0-1 | 13-23 | 92-115 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 75-74 | 1-1 | 14-26 | 144-139 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-0 | 6-10 | 48-68 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 42-40 | 0-0 | 9-8 | 60-61 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 3-1 | 13-15 | 65-65 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 40-52 | 5-1 | 21-19 | 127-72 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-1 | 5-2 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 14-21 | 2-2 | 7-4 | 41-19 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-5 | 21-33 | 122-147 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 3-9 | 19-55 | 170-285 | | in all lined games | 1-5 | 21-33 | 122-147 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 1-6 | 11-45 | 71-207 | | as an underdog | 1-5 | 20-30 | 100-116 | 0-0 | 21-21 | 77-77 | 1-6 | 10-42 | 42-180 | | as a home underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 3-6 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 1-8 | 5-15 | | in all home games | 1-1 | 11-11 | 48-62 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 31-46 | 3-3 | 13-21 | 114-110 | | in home lined games | 1-1 | 11-11 | 48-62 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 31-46 | 1-2 | 6-17 | 36-79 | | against conference opponents | 0-2 | 16-24 | 102-116 | 0-0 | 16-21 | 71-79 | 0-2 | 9-31 | 84-190 | | in January games | 0-2 | 9-10 | 50-51 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 32-37 | 0-2 | 6-14 | 49-88 | | after a conference game | 1-0 | 17-19 | 92-106 | 0-0 | 13-19 | 63-73 | 1-1 | 10-30 | 92-181 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-0 | 10-14 | 58-74 | 0-0 | 11-12 | 45-47 | 0-1 | 5-23 | 34-111 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 0-4 | 7-13 | 47-61 | 0-0 | 10-6 | 37-35 | 0-5 | 9-19 | 60-111 | | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 0-2 | 4-6 | 15-23 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 10-13 | 0-2 | 4-13 | 11-42 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-4 | 9-13 | 37-50 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 27-35 | 0-5 | 5-24 | 30-94 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 0-2 | 10-14 | 46-62 | 0-0 | 12-10 | 35-39 | 1-3 | 12-21 | 87-104 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 6-9 | -1.7 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 67.2 | 32.0 | 41.4% | 38.7 | 68.5 | 32.1 | 43.4% | 32.9 | | Road Games | 2-3 | +1 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 63.8 | 33.2 | 43.5% | 34.4 | 68.8 | 31.4 | 44.5% | 33.6 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 4-0 | 0-0 | 76.8 | 36.4 | 47.7% | 38.2 | 70.4 | 31.6 | 42.5% | 32.6 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 64.5 | 32.5 | 43.2% | 33.5 | 75.5 | 38.5 | 48.1% | 27.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 67.2 | 32.0 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 5-18 | 28.2% | 16-24 | 64.7% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 68.9 | 32.4 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 29.8% | 15-22 | 68.5% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.8 | 33.2 | 23-52 | 43.5% | 7-17 | 41.4% | 11-18 | 64.8% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.5 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 8-24 | 34.5% | 12-18 | 69.4% | 33 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.5 | 31.8 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.8 | 31.4 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 32.4% | 12-19 | 62.5% | 34 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-9 | -1.8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 63.2 | 28.5 | 43.3% | 30.8 | 76.0 | 35.2 | 47.9% | 33.8 | | Home Games | 3-3 | -0.8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.7 | 31.8 | 49.0% | 32.5 | 65.7 | 29.2 | 40.9% | 30.7 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -1 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 52.4 | 24.4 | 37.2% | 29.8 | 81.0 | 38.0 | 51.0% | 36.0 | | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 54.5 | 23.0 | 36.9% | 23.0 | 78.0 | 41.0 | 53.1% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.2 | 28.5 | 22-51 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 13-18 | 72.7% | 31 | 8 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 71.2 | 33.6 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.7 | 31.8 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 32 | 8 | 18 | 14 | 8 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 35.2 | 28-59 | 47.9% | 8-21 | 39.4% | 11-16 | 71.7% | 34 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 32.1 | 25-58 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.7 | 29.2 | 23-57 | 40.9% | 8-23 | 35.7% | 11-14 | 75.9% | 31 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UT-CHATTANOOGA 67.3, THE CITADEL 66.6 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 11-5 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 18-5 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 6 of 10 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| THE CITADEL is 1-1 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | THE CITADEL is 1-1 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 6-2 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 10-2 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 against the spread versus THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 1-0 straight up against THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/2012 | THE CITADEL | 48 | 141 | SU ATS | 25 | 18-40 | 45.0% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 2-4 | 50.0% | 31 | 6 | 17 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 46 | -10.5 | Under | 26 | 17-53 | 32.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 29 | 10 | 8 | 1/13/2011 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 69 | 137.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 12-30 | 40.0% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 32 | 11 | 7 | | | THE CITADEL | 68 | -3 | Under | 33 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 27 | 6 | 8 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 55.4% of the time since 1997. (139-112) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 58.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (27-19) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 45.4% of the time since 1997. (98-118) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 45.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (20-24) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G/F] 01/09/2013 - Raemond Robinson probable Thursday vs. Tennessee Chat ( Foot ) | | [F] 12/19/2012 - C.J. Bray out for season ( Ankle ) |
|
|