|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| COLL OF CHARLESTON | -12 | | | THE CITADEL | | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 7-5 | 38-33 | 173-141 | 0-2 | 29-33 | 112-118 | 11-5 | 56-28 | 339-145 | | in all lined games | 7-5 | 38-33 | 173-141 | 0-2 | 29-33 | 112-118 | 8-4 | 46-27 | 198-121 | | as a favorite | 5-4 | 24-27 | 97-98 | 0-1 | 19-26 | 64-78 | 6-3 | 36-17 | 149-50 | | as a road favorite of 12.5 to 15 points | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | | as a road favorite of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 3-0 | | in road games | 3-0 | 18-13 | 87-52 | 0-0 | 13-15 | 52-50 | 5-0 | 22-14 | 118-84 | | in road lined games | 3-0 | 18-13 | 87-52 | 0-0 | 13-15 | 52-50 | 3-0 | 17-14 | 72-70 | | against conference opponents | 2-2 | 19-24 | 109-106 | 0-0 | 20-20 | 74-85 | 3-1 | 29-15 | 206-86 | | in January games | 1-2 | 8-13 | 46-51 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 36-36 | 2-1 | 11-10 | 99-42 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 3-1 | 14-13 | 59-54 | 0-0 | 9-15 | 35-49 | 3-1 | 22-7 | 120-49 | | after a conference game | 2-2 | 19-22 | 107-100 | 0-1 | 19-20 | 75-81 | 2-2 | 28-15 | 202-88 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-2 | 8-18 | 59-76 | 0-1 | 15-11 | 47-53 | 0-2 | 17-11 | 95-52 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 2-3 | 8-11 | 40-35 | 0-2 | 9-7 | 24-29 | 4-3 | 11-11 | 114-40 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 0-1 | 8-9 | 43-42 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 29-34 | 1-0 | 16-4 | 86-32 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 4-2 | 15-15 | 66-51 | 0-0 | 12-14 | 44-43 | 7-1 | 26-8 | 168-30 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 1-2 | 3-5 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 13-14 | 3-1 | 6-3 | 42-11 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-7 | 21-35 | 122-149 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 3-11 | 19-57 | 170-287 | | in all lined games | 1-7 | 21-35 | 122-149 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 88-95 | 1-8 | 11-47 | 71-209 | | as an underdog | 1-7 | 20-32 | 100-118 | 0-0 | 21-21 | 77-77 | 1-8 | 10-44 | 42-182 | | as a home underdog of 12.5 to 15 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-7 | | as a home underdog of 12.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-14 | | in all home games | 1-3 | 11-13 | 48-64 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 31-46 | 3-5 | 13-23 | 114-112 | | in home lined games | 1-3 | 11-13 | 48-64 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 31-46 | 1-4 | 6-19 | 36-81 | | against conference opponents | 0-4 | 16-26 | 102-118 | 0-0 | 16-21 | 71-79 | 0-4 | 9-33 | 84-192 | | in January games | 0-4 | 9-12 | 50-53 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 32-37 | 0-4 | 6-16 | 49-90 | | when playing with one or less days rest | 0-1 | 10-11 | 47-55 | 0-0 | 10-10 | 36-37 | 0-2 | 6-19 | 53-99 | | after a conference game | 1-2 | 17-21 | 92-108 | 0-0 | 13-19 | 63-73 | 1-3 | 10-32 | 92-183 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 0-2 | 10-16 | 58-76 | 0-0 | 11-12 | 45-47 | 0-3 | 5-25 | 34-113 | | after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games | 0-4 | 4-8 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 10-13 | 0-4 | 4-15 | 11-44 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 0-6 | 9-15 | 37-52 | 0-0 | 8-10 | 27-35 | 0-7 | 5-26 | 30-96 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 0-3 | 6-13 | 63-70 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 40-47 | 0-5 | 3-23 | 40-146 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-0 | 2-0 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 7-12 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 0-2 | 4-4 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 9-12 | 0-3 | 1-11 | 16-42 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 0-1 | 2-1 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 12-14 | | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=64 points/game | 0-1 | 2-2 | 12-18 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 9-12 | 0-2 | 1-6 | 29-29 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-5 | +1.3 | 7-5 | 0-2 | 63.4 | 30.7 | 44.5% | 36.8 | 61.7 | 28.3 | 40.4% | 31.7 | | Road Games | 5-0 | +2.4 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 67.6 | 34.4 | 48.2% | 37.0 | 61.0 | 30.4 | 39.0% | 31.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 70.0 | 34.4 | 45.7% | 38.6 | 60.4 | 27.2 | 38.9% | 32.4 | | Conference Games | 3-1 | +2.4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 64.7 | 32.5 | 44.0% | 38.5 | 57.7 | 24.7 | 37.7% | 32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.4 | 30.7 | 22-50 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 37.4% | 13-19 | 65.5% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 4 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 31 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 13-19 | 66.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.6 | 34.4 | 24-49 | 48.2% | 7-15 | 48.1% | 13-19 | 67.7% | 37 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 4 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.7 | 28.3 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 5-16 | 29.5% | 11-15 | 70.7% | 32 | 9 | 9 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.7 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.0 | 30.4 | 23-58 | 39.0% | 5-18 | 27.2% | 11-15 | 70.1% | 31 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-11 | -3.8 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 63.4 | 28.6 | 43.2% | 31.0 | 75.1 | 34.7 | 47.5% | 33.6 | | Home Games | 3-5 | -2.8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 69.2 | 31.2 | 47.4% | 32.4 | 66.6 | 29.9 | 41.7% | 31.0 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 55.4 | 25.4 | 40.1% | 28.6 | 75.2 | 37.6 | 48.1% | 35.2 | | Conference Games | 0-4 | -4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 59.7 | 26.2 | 39.9% | 27.5 | 73.7 | 36.5 | 48.9% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.4 | 28.6 | 22-51 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 13-17 | 72.7% | 31 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 17 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 70.7 | 33.3 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.2 | 31.2 | 24-51 | 47.4% | 7-20 | 37.5% | 13-17 | 77.4% | 32 | 9 | 18 | 15 | 8 | 17 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 34.7 | 28-58 | 47.5% | 8-20 | 40.1% | 12-16 | 73.5% | 34 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.6 | 29.9 | 23-56 | 41.7% | 8-22 | 37.6% | 12-15 | 78.0% | 31 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLL OF CHARLESTON 69.1, THE CITADEL 65.7 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| COLL OF CHARLESTON is 12-11 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 25-6 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 11 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| COLL OF CHARLESTON is 3-1 against the spread versus THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 4-0 straight up against THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| COLL OF CHARLESTON is 7-4 against the spread versus THE CITADEL since 1997 | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 11-4 straight up against THE CITADEL since 1997 | | 6 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| THE CITADEL is 1-1 against the spread versus COLL OF CHARLESTON over the last 3 seasons | | COLL OF CHARLESTON is 2-0 straight up against THE CITADEL over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/25/2012 | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 55 | -10 | SU Under | 21 | 18-41 | 43.9% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 26 | 5 | 14 | | | THE CITADEL | 47 | 128.5 | ATS | 21 | 14-42 | 33.3% | 2-13 | 15.4% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 37 | 8 | 17 | 12/1/2011 | THE CITADEL | 64 | 143 | Over | 33 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 43 | 13 | 21 | | | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 83 | -16 | SU ATS | 41 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 7-28 | 25.0% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 10 | 2/17/2011 | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 85 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 35-60 | 58.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 29 | 6 | 4 | | | THE CITADEL | 63 | 141 | Over | 34 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 39 | 17 | 11 | 1/15/2011 | THE CITADEL | 66 | 138 | Over | 31 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 29 | 5 | 16 | | | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 87 | -17 | SU ATS | 39 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 13-31 | 41.9% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in COLL OF CHARLESTON games 48.6% of the time since 1997. (124-131) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in COLL OF CHARLESTON games 46.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (26-30) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 45% of the time since 1997. (98-120) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in THE CITADEL games 43.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (20-26) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 12/19/2012 - C.J. Bray out for season ( Ankle ) |
|
|