|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-7 | 31-36 | 193-209 | 3-0 | 28-25 | 120-132 | 12-6 | 41-41 | 226-254 | | in all lined games | 8-7 | 31-36 | 193-209 | 3-0 | 28-25 | 120-132 | 9-6 | 28-41 | 160-248 | | as an underdog | 5-3 | 25-19 | 127-132 | 2-0 | 22-14 | 96-86 | 4-4 | 14-30 | 62-200 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-0 | 3-1 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 6-22 | | in road games | 4-2 | 14-11 | 83-82 | 1-0 | 13-6 | 51-47 | 3-3 | 8-19 | 41-130 | | in road lined games | 4-2 | 14-11 | 83-82 | 1-0 | 13-6 | 51-47 | 3-3 | 7-19 | 39-129 | | against conference opponents | 3-4 | 22-23 | 132-145 | 2-0 | 23-17 | 92-94 | 3-4 | 15-31 | 87-194 | | in January games | 3-4 | 13-12 | 62-65 | 2-0 | 10-10 | 44-38 | 3-4 | 10-15 | 40-90 | | after a conference game | 3-4 | 22-23 | 124-143 | 2-0 | 21-17 | 90-91 | 3-4 | 16-30 | 100-180 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 1-2 | 14-13 | 88-88 | 2-0 | 14-12 | 64-68 | 2-1 | 12-16 | 63-120 | | after scoring 60 points or less | 1-2 | 5-9 | 56-55 | 2-0 | 6-7 | 38-46 | 4-1 | 9-11 | 67-72 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 3-5 | 20-24 | 139-154 | 3-0 | 20-17 | 97-99 | 4-5 | 16-30 | 104-209 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 1-2 | 13-11 | 79-93 | 1-0 | 12-9 | 65-65 | 1-2 | 6-18 | 51-125 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-7 | 40-35 | 228-232 | 4-5 | 33-40 | 174-192 | 12-5 | 64-28 | 401-136 | | in all lined games | 5-7 | 40-35 | 228-232 | 4-5 | 33-40 | 174-192 | 8-5 | 50-28 | 333-136 | | as a favorite | 2-4 | 24-26 | 177-188 | 2-1 | 21-27 | 136-141 | 6-0 | 38-14 | 294-76 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 2-1 | 4-3 | 14-23 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 13-20 | 3-0 | 5-2 | 22-15 | | in all home games | 2-3 | 14-14 | 96-96 | 0-2 | 9-16 | 65-76 | 8-1 | 34-9 | 223-36 | | in home lined games | 2-3 | 14-14 | 96-96 | 0-2 | 9-16 | 65-76 | 4-1 | 20-9 | 157-36 | | against conference opponents | 3-2 | 25-23 | 144-144 | 2-1 | 24-23 | 112-119 | 2-3 | 27-23 | 195-98 | | in January games | 3-2 | 11-9 | 67-66 | 2-1 | 7-11 | 45-51 | 2-3 | 10-10 | 87-48 | | when playing with 7 or more days rest | 1-0 | 1-1 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 2-0 | 4-1 | 20-2 | | after a conference game | 3-1 | 26-21 | 144-143 | 1-1 | 25-21 | 113-125 | 2-2 | 27-22 | 199-93 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-0 | 10-11 | 43-51 | 1-0 | 9-11 | 37-46 | 1-1 | 12-10 | 60-36 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-6 | 34-27 | 184-183 | 4-4 | 27-32 | 146-162 | 8-5 | 45-25 | 262-126 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 1-1 | 21-16 | 120-122 | 1-1 | 15-21 | 96-120 | 0-2 | 20-17 | 157-89 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-6 | +6.4 | 8-7 | 3-0 | 69.4 | 32.2 | 45.8% | 35.8 | 67.2 | 29.4 | 41.4% | 32.9 | | Road Games | 4-3 | +2.9 | 5-2 | 1-0 | 67.1 | 31.1 | 44.3% | 37.9 | 69.7 | 32.7 | 41.0% | 33.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.3 | 2-3 | 1-0 | 62.4 | 24.8 | 41.6% | 34.8 | 66.4 | 30.2 | 43.3% | 35.2 | | Conference Games | 3-4 | +0.9 | 3-4 | 2-0 | 61.7 | 26.1 | 41.9% | 35.4 | 67.4 | 30.7 | 42.9% | 33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.4 | 32.2 | 25-55 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 34.0% | 14-19 | 73.5% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30.3 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 13-18 | 69.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.1 | 31.1 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 5-14 | 37.0% | 13-18 | 74.4% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.2 | 29.4 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 30.6% | 14-21 | 68.8% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.7 | 32.7 | 24-58 | 41.0% | 7-22 | 30.9% | 15-24 | 64.8% | 34 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-5 | +5.8 | 5-7 | 4-5 | 71.0 | 33.1 | 46.1% | 31.9 | 64.7 | 28.7 | 40.9% | 35.9 | | Home Games | 8-1 | +2 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 72.0 | 36.1 | 47.8% | 33.4 | 60.0 | 26.6 | 39.3% | 35.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 71.8 | 33.2 | 46.0% | 33.8 | 72.0 | 31.6 | 45.1% | 34.4 | | Conference Games | 2-3 | +1 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 71.8 | 33.2 | 46.0% | 33.8 | 72.0 | 31.6 | 45.1% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 33.1 | 25-55 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 14-20 | 72.6% | 32 | 7 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.0 | 36.1 | 26-55 | 47.8% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 14-19 | 69.7% | 33 | 8 | 15 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.7 | 28.7 | 23-57 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 13-18 | 69.7% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32.2 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 15-21 | 69.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.0 | 26.6 | 23-58 | 39.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 10-14 | 68.5% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 72.9, CONNECTICUT 75.4 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the spread versus RUTGERS since 1997 | | CONNECTICUT is 15-2 straight up against RUTGERS since 1997 | | 7 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-1 against the spread versus RUTGERS over the last 3 seasons | | CONNECTICUT is 1-1 straight up against RUTGERS over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CONNECTICUT is 4-1 against the spread versus RUTGERS since 1997 | | CONNECTICUT is 5-0 straight up against RUTGERS since 1997 | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 1-0 against the spread versus RUTGERS over the last 3 seasons | | CONNECTICUT is 1-0 straight up against RUTGERS over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/7/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 60 | -6 | Under | 30 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 38 | 14 | 20 | | | RUTGERS | 67 | 134.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 28 | 8 | 14 | 1/11/2011 | RUTGERS | 53 | 134.5 | Under | 27 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 3-17 | 17.6% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 37 | 10 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 67 | -11 | SU ATS | 32 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 37 | 6 | 8 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in RUTGERS games 52.6% of the time since 1997. (174-157) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in RUTGERS games 50.9% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (29-28) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CONNECTICUT games 45.1% of the time since 1997. (169-206) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CONNECTICUT games 41.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (22-31) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 11/02/2012 - Greg Lewis out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [G] 01/26/2013 - Shabazz Napier probable Sunday vs. Rutgers ( Shoulder ) |
|
|