|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| UT-CHATTANOOGA | | | | UNC-GREENSBORO | -9 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 8-8 | 29-36 | 151-173 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 8-12 | 35-49 | 251-231 | | in all lined games | 8-8 | 29-36 | 151-173 | 0-0 | 22-24 | 102-110 | 5-11 | 23-43 | 154-176 | | as an underdog | 5-6 | 18-25 | 73-91 | 0-0 | 15-16 | 55-60 | 2-9 | 9-35 | 43-125 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 0-4 | 8-15 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 8-15 | | in road games | 5-2 | 15-18 | 68-78 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 45-49 | 3-5 | 9-29 | 66-133 | | in road lined games | 5-2 | 15-18 | 68-78 | 0-0 | 12-13 | 45-49 | 2-5 | 7-27 | 48-102 | | against conference opponents | 3-4 | 20-24 | 106-124 | 0-0 | 19-18 | 79-81 | 3-4 | 20-25 | 153-137 | | in January games | 4-3 | 13-11 | 55-55 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 35-38 | 3-4 | 12-13 | 80-63 | | after a conference game | 2-4 | 15-26 | 94-118 | 0-0 | 18-16 | 75-74 | 3-4 | 16-29 | 146-142 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 1-2 | 8-11 | 44-44 | 0-0 | 11-5 | 32-32 | 1-2 | 5-16 | 52-47 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 1-3 | 9-11 | 39-38 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 26-25 | 1-4 | 8-16 | 61-53 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 5-2 | 15-16 | 67-66 | 0-0 | 11-13 | 40-52 | 7-2 | 23-20 | 129-73 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 1-1 | 7-13 | 44-45 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 31-37 | 1-1 | 7-14 | 64-46 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-9 | 35-36 | 147-174 | 0-1 | 28-28 | 111-105 | 5-13 | 25-56 | 191-279 | | in all lined games | 5-9 | 35-36 | 147-174 | 0-1 | 28-28 | 111-105 | 3-11 | 22-52 | 119-216 | | as a favorite | 1-3 | 8-6 | 48-55 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 33-26 | 2-2 | 11-3 | 74-32 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-1 | 0-2 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 6-5 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 15-5 | | in all home games | 2-5 | 13-17 | 56-74 | 0-0 | 14-10 | 45-41 | 5-5 | 15-22 | 116-87 | | in home lined games | 2-5 | 13-17 | 56-74 | 0-0 | 14-10 | 45-41 | 3-4 | 12-20 | 68-69 | | against conference opponents | 3-4 | 24-20 | 111-110 | 0-0 | 23-16 | 81-71 | 3-4 | 21-26 | 131-160 | | in January games | 2-4 | 13-9 | 53-49 | 0-0 | 10-6 | 39-29 | 3-4 | 13-10 | 71-72 | | after a conference game | 1-4 | 23-19 | 105-105 | 0-0 | 21-17 | 83-66 | 3-4 | 21-26 | 131-159 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-2 | 10-8 | 47-42 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 37-31 | 0-2 | 10-10 | 49-52 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 2-5 | 13-13 | 56-61 | 0-0 | 12-8 | 41-36 | 2-6 | 14-14 | 110-79 | | when playing against a team with a losing record after 15 or more games | 1-2 | 11-7 | 39-43 | 0-0 | 11-5 | 31-26 | 2-1 | 13-6 | 59-45 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-12 | -2.8 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 68.5 | 31.5 | 40.5% | 38.7 | 72.1 | 34.2 | 44.8% | 34.2 | | Road Games | 3-5 | 0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 63.6 | 30.9 | 40.1% | 35.0 | 72.5 | 34.1 | 45.7% | 36.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 72.4 | 30.0 | 38.0% | 38.8 | 82.8 | 40.4 | 48.5% | 38.4 | | Conference Games | 3-4 | -0.1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 70.1 | 30.7 | 39.2% | 37.3 | 80.7 | 39.9 | 48.4% | 35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.5 | 31.5 | 23-58 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 29.8% | 16-24 | 66.5% | 39 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.2 | 32.4 | 24-57 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 15-21 | 68.7% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.6 | 30.9 | 22-55 | 40.1% | 7-18 | 40.0% | 12-18 | 67.4% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.1 | 34.2 | 25-56 | 44.8% | 9-25 | 36.5% | 13-18 | 70.3% | 34 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.8 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 13-18 | 69.0% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.5 | 34.1 | 26-58 | 45.7% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 12-18 | 65.0% | 36 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-13 | -8 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 72.6 | 35.1 | 41.7% | 37.7 | 75.3 | 35.6 | 44.2% | 36.3 | | Home Games | 5-5 | -3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 76.5 | 37.7 | 43.4% | 40.1 | 70.8 | 32.9 | 42.1% | 33.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 65.4 | 35.2 | 39.2% | 37.4 | 66.0 | 28.4 | 39.5% | 34.6 | | Conference Games | 3-4 | -1.8 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 66.3 | 35.6 | 41.2% | 36.0 | 67.0 | 29.7 | 38.8% | 35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.6 | 35.1 | 26-61 | 41.7% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 70.3 | 32.7 | 25-57 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 13-20 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.5 | 37.7 | 27-62 | 43.4% | 7-22 | 33.0% | 15-21 | 71.6% | 40 | 11 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.3 | 35.6 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 7-18 | 36.8% | 20-27 | 73.7% | 36 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67 | 31.2 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.8 | 32.9 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 7-18 | 39.2% | 18-26 | 72.3% | 33 | 6 | 10 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UT-CHATTANOOGA 67, UNC-GREENSBORO 66.9 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| UNC-GREENSBORO is 15-9 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | UT-CHATTANOOGA is 16-12 straight up against UNC-GREENSBORO since 1997 | | 9 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UNC-GREENSBORO is 3-1 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | UNC-GREENSBORO is 2-2 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| UNC-GREENSBORO is 5-5 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | UNC-GREENSBORO is 7-6 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA since 1997 | | 5 of 8 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| UNC-GREENSBORO is 1-1 against the spread versus UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | UNC-GREENSBORO is 1-1 straight up against UT-CHATTANOOGA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/11/2012 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 77 | 153.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 35 | 5 | 14 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 76 | -4 | Under | 37 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 4-23 | 17.4% | 24-30 | 80.0% | 43 | 14 | 15 | 1/19/2012 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 72 | 148 | Over | 31 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 16-26 | 61.5% | 40 | 14 | 16 | | | UNC-GREENSBORO | 81 | -1 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 35 | 11 | 8 | 1/27/2011 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 110 | 149.5 | ATS | 29 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 17-43 | 39.5% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 35 | 14 | 12 | | | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 111 | -8.5 | SU Over | 40 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 11-23 | 47.8% | 36-53 | 67.9% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 1/8/2011 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 70 | -3 | SU ATS | 38 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 10-27 | 37.0% | 16-30 | 53.3% | 45 | 15 | 18 | | | UNC-GREENSBORO | 65 | 149 | Under | 27 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 22-33 | 66.7% | 31 | 8 | 16 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 55.3% of the time since 1997. (141-114) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UT-CHATTANOOGA games 58% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (29-21) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UNC-GREENSBORO games 50.4% of the time since 1997. (129-127) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UNC-GREENSBORO games 53.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (32-28) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 01/05/2013 - Korey Van Dussen out indefinitely ( Hand ) |
|
|