|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-9 | 34-37 | 163-172 | 4-14 | 35-36 | 105-109 | 13-10 | 48-40 | 244-164 | | in all lined games | 9-9 | 34-37 | 163-172 | 4-14 | 35-36 | 105-109 | 10-10 | 36-38 | 187-157 | | when the total is 130 to 139.5 | 4-4 | 11-13 | 50-51 | 2-7 | 13-12 | 48-53 | 4-6 | 13-13 | 59-46 | | as an underdog | 3-4 | 16-18 | 75-71 | 4-5 | 16-20 | 46-53 | 3-6 | 9-28 | 47-107 | | as a road underdog of 12.5 or more points | 0-0 | 3-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 1-12 | | as a road underdog of 15.5 to 18 points | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | | in road games | 2-1 | 10-11 | 50-66 | 1-4 | 10-13 | 34-40 | 2-3 | 6-19 | 36-92 | | in road lined games | 2-1 | 10-11 | 50-66 | 1-4 | 10-13 | 34-40 | 2-3 | 4-19 | 31-90 | | in a road game where the total is 135 to 139.5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 7-11 | 1-1 | 5-1 | 10-11 | 0-2 | 0-6 | 5-16 | | against conference opponents | 3-4 | 20-22 | 110-102 | 1-7 | 21-22 | 62-72 | 3-6 | 17-28 | 106-116 | | in February games | 0-1 | 8-6 | 49-36 | 1-0 | 8-7 | 28-26 | 0-2 | 6-10 | 48-44 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-1 | 1-5 | 16-20 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 11-18 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 30-19 | | after a conference game | 2-5 | 18-22 | 109-101 | 1-7 | 20-21 | 66-71 | 2-7 | 15-29 | 107-114 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 1-3 | 9-14 | 56-50 | 1-3 | 11-13 | 38-36 | 1-4 | 10-15 | 57-53 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 1-0 | 4-1 | 13-6 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 6-5 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 10-11 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 5-6 | 26-27 | 134-129 | 4-6 | 28-24 | 84-85 | 5-7 | 24-34 | 145-142 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 1-3 | 17-16 | 93-74 | 1-3 | 18-15 | 60-58 | 1-4 | 12-23 | 82-94 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games | 0-2 | 6-6 | 31-26 | 1-2 | 6-7 | 15-19 | 0-3 | 4-10 | 21-40 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game | 3-4 | 10-10 | 46-50 | 4-3 | 10-10 | 26-24 | 4-5 | 9-14 | 49-55 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 11-10 | 41-38 | 207-187 | 12-8 | 39-40 | 153-156 | 22-1 | 62-28 | 324-111 | | in all lined games | 11-10 | 41-38 | 207-187 | 12-8 | 39-40 | 153-156 | 20-1 | 53-27 | 293-110 | | when the total is 130 to 139.5 | 1-3 | 19-13 | 78-51 | 3-1 | 14-18 | 70-60 | 4-0 | 23-9 | 97-34 | | as a favorite | 10-10 | 30-26 | 165-148 | 12-7 | 29-27 | 119-115 | 19-1 | 45-12 | 263-58 | | as a home favorite of 12.5 or more points | 4-5 | 10-9 | 34-41 | 7-1 | 13-5 | 24-18 | 9-0 | 16-3 | 68-9 | | as a home favorite of 15.5 to 18 points | 3-2 | 4-3 | 9-8 | 3-1 | 4-2 | 5-4 | 5-0 | 6-1 | 14-3 | | in all home games | 6-7 | 21-21 | 79-81 | 9-3 | 22-19 | 56-62 | 14-0 | 41-10 | 165-29 | | in home lined games | 6-7 | 21-21 | 79-81 | 9-3 | 22-19 | 56-62 | 13-0 | 33-9 | 137-28 | | in a home game where the total is 135 to 139.5 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 20-10 | 1-1 | 6-5 | 15-15 | 2-0 | 9-2 | 27-3 | | against conference opponents | 4-4 | 23-20 | 119-104 | 6-2 | 18-25 | 83-85 | 7-1 | 28-15 | 168-60 | | in February games | 1-1 | 8-9 | 47-47 | 2-0 | 6-11 | 34-33 | 2-0 | 12-5 | 69-28 | | on Tuesday nights | 3-2 | 8-10 | 36-33 | 3-2 | 8-10 | 26-38 | 4-1 | 11-8 | 58-21 | | after a conference game | 4-3 | 22-20 | 120-101 | 5-2 | 18-24 | 87-85 | 6-1 | 26-16 | 167-60 | | off a win against a conference rival | 3-3 | 15-12 | 89-73 | 4-2 | 11-16 | 65-62 | 5-1 | 18-9 | 123-43 | | after allowing 60 points or less | 0-4 | 8-16 | 61-61 | 2-2 | 14-11 | 54-48 | 4-0 | 18-11 | 103-35 | | after scoring 80 points or more | 6-6 | 10-12 | 57-74 | 6-5 | 13-9 | 47-47 | 11-1 | 18-7 | 105-39 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-8 | 29-32 | 169-156 | 7-7 | 27-34 | 128-137 | 15-1 | 41-24 | 237-103 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 2-3 | 16-19 | 104-92 | 3-2 | 13-22 | 83-77 | 4-1 | 21-14 | 140-60 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game after 15+ games | 1-0 | 2-3 | 29-31 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 29-23 | 1-0 | 2-3 | 44-18 | | versus good defensive teams - allowing <=64 points/game | 2-0 | 6-7 | 52-54 | 2-0 | 10-4 | 51-41 | 2-0 | 8-8 | 81-33 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 13-10 | -5.7 | 9-9 | 4-14 | 68.2 | 32.3 | 45.2% | 33.7 | 62.9 | 28.3 | 41.5% | 34.5 | | Road Games | 4-4 | -0.6 | 4-2 | 2-6 | 64.2 | 33.0 | 45.7% | 32.2 | 63.0 | 26.6 | 41.8% | 32.5 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.3 | 2-1 | 1-3 | 61.6 | 30.8 | 43.0% | 33.4 | 58.6 | 25.6 | 38.9% | 34.8 | | Conference Games | 3-6 | -3.6 | 3-4 | 1-7 | 61.4 | 31.2 | 43.3% | 34.1 | 60.1 | 25.6 | 39.6% | 35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 68.2 | 32.3 | 25-55 | 45.2% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 13-18 | 69.0% | 34 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 67.3 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 67.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.2 | 33.0 | 24-52 | 45.7% | 5-15 | 36.1% | 11-16 | 69.0% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.9 | 28.3 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 5-17 | 31.3% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.9 | 33.5 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.0 | 26.6 | 22-52 | 41.8% | 5-18 | 27.9% | 15-22 | 65.7% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 22-1 | +8 | 11-10 | 12-8 | 82.3 | 41.4 | 48.9% | 42.3 | 65.9 | 30.0 | 38.1% | 32.0 | | Home Games | 14-0 | +4 | 6-7 | 9-3 | 85.4 | 44.9 | 49.9% | 42.4 | 67.4 | 31.1 | 38.4% | 31.0 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 82.8 | 44.6 | 45.6% | 46.2 | 68.0 | 27.6 | 36.9% | 33.8 | | Conference Games | 7-1 | +2 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 81.4 | 41.7 | 46.6% | 42.5 | 69.0 | 28.7 | 38.8% | 34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.3 | 41.4 | 29-60 | 48.9% | 7-17 | 38.6% | 17-25 | 68.7% | 42 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.1 | 32.8 | 24-57 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-21 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.4 | 44.9 | 30-60 | 49.9% | 7-18 | 39.8% | 18-26 | 69.1% | 42 | 14 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.9 | 30.0 | 23-61 | 38.1% | 7-21 | 34.3% | 12-18 | 70.6% | 32 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 71.8 | 33.7 | 25-58 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 15-21 | 68.1% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.4 | 31.1 | 23-61 | 38.4% | 8-21 | 36.6% | 13-17 | 72.8% | 31 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ALABAMA 74.1, KENTUCKY 75 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| KENTUCKY is 7-7 against the spread versus ALABAMA since 1997 | | KENTUCKY is 10-5 straight up against ALABAMA since 1997 | | 8 of 11 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| KENTUCKY is 2-0 against the spread versus ALABAMA over the last 3 seasons | | KENTUCKY is 2-0 straight up against ALABAMA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| KENTUCKY is 2-2 against the spread versus ALABAMA since 1997 | | KENTUCKY is 3-2 straight up against ALABAMA since 1997 | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| KENTUCKY is 1-0 against the spread versus ALABAMA over the last 3 seasons | | KENTUCKY is 1-0 straight up against ALABAMA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/24/2009 | KENTUCKY | 61 | -6 | SU ATS | 19 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 42 | 8 | 23 | | | ALABAMA | 51 | 137 | Under | 25 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 36 | 9 | 19 | 2/9/2008 | ALABAMA | 52 | 141 | Under | 27 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 25 | 6 | 13 | | | KENTUCKY | 62 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 19-39 | 48.7% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 31 | 6 | 17 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ALABAMA games 49.2% of the time since 1997. (129-133) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in ALABAMA games 45.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (23-28) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in KENTUCKY games 52.1% of the time since 1997. (164-151) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in KENTUCKY games 48.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-35) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in ALABAMA games 48.6% of the time since 1997. (88-93) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in ALABAMA games 56.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (36-28) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in KENTUCKY games 47.7% of the time since 1997. (127-139) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in KENTUCKY games 52.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (39-35) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 01/07/2010 - Andrew Steele out for season ( Foot ) | | [F] 12/05/2009 - Yamene Coleman left the team ( Personal ) | | [F] 11/13/2009 - Demetrius Jemison out for season ( Achilles ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|