|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| TENNESSEE TECH | | | | AUSTIN PEAY | -7 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 9-8 | 34-34 | 123-125 | 8-6 | 35-28 | 78-73 | 12-12 | 37-49 | 210-176 | | in all lined games | 9-8 | 34-34 | 123-125 | 8-6 | 35-28 | 78-73 | 7-11 | 25-44 | 127-130 | | when the total is 150 to 159.5 | 3-2 | 10-11 | 19-18 | 2-3 | 13-8 | 20-18 | 3-2 | 10-11 | 19-19 | | as an underdog | 3-8 | 18-21 | 52-64 | 5-4 | 23-14 | 45-32 | 1-11 | 7-33 | 25-97 | | as a road underdog of 9.5 to 12 points | 0-1 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 2-12 | | in road games | 4-6 | 21-20 | 63-69 | 4-4 | 23-16 | 48-35 | 5-8 | 15-32 | 65-121 | | in road lined games | 4-6 | 21-20 | 63-69 | 4-4 | 23-16 | 48-35 | 2-8 | 11-30 | 47-91 | | in a road game where the total is 150 to 154.5 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 4-5 | 1-0 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 3-7 | | against conference opponents | 8-5 | 28-25 | 95-92 | 7-5 | 28-23 | 57-56 | 6-7 | 22-31 | 138-107 | | in February games | 1-1 | 7-10 | 30-42 | 1-1 | 9-8 | 21-20 | 0-2 | 4-13 | 54-46 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-0 | 2-2 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 7-6 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 30-23 | | after a conference game | 8-5 | 27-24 | 90-88 | 7-5 | 28-22 | 60-53 | 6-7 | 22-31 | 142-102 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 4-2 | 16-11 | 38-33 | 4-2 | 15-12 | 21-25 | 3-3 | 13-15 | 40-35 | | after allowing 80 points or more | 3-3 | 12-12 | 35-32 | 2-3 | 12-11 | 20-21 | 5-5 | 16-16 | 62-38 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 4-5 | 12-18 | 50-62 | 5-2 | 18-9 | 37-26 | 4-7 | 8-25 | 63-94 | | when playing against a team with a winning record after 15 or more games | 3-3 | 8-12 | 28-37 | 4-1 | 13-6 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 4-16 | 37-45 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 13-10 | 39-42 | 139-137 | 9-8 | 43-31 | 93-73 | 14-11 | 57-36 | 235-164 | | in all lined games | 13-10 | 39-42 | 139-137 | 9-8 | 43-31 | 93-73 | 12-11 | 50-34 | 162-123 | | when the total is 150 to 159.5 | 2-2 | 5-9 | 7-10 | 2-2 | 12-2 | 14-3 | 2-2 | 9-5 | 11-6 | | as a favorite | 3-6 | 22-24 | 75-61 | 6-2 | 28-15 | 48-36 | 7-2 | 40-7 | 120-20 | | as a home favorite of 9.5 to 12 points | 0-1 | 3-4 | 9-10 | 1-0 | 4-3 | 9-4 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 17-2 | | in all home games | 4-5 | 12-21 | 58-53 | 5-3 | 21-11 | 42-28 | 9-2 | 31-8 | 139-31 | | in home lined games | 4-5 | 12-21 | 58-53 | 5-3 | 21-11 | 42-28 | 7-2 | 26-7 | 91-22 | | in a home game where the total is 150 to 154.5 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 4-1 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 5-0 | | against conference opponents | 7-6 | 27-28 | 105-84 | 5-7 | 28-25 | 57-58 | 8-5 | 42-15 | 169-84 | | in February games | 1-1 | 9-8 | 44-32 | 0-2 | 8-9 | 24-18 | 1-1 | 12-5 | 69-37 | | on Tuesday nights | 0-1 | 2-4 | 13-16 | 1-0 | 5-3 | 14-4 | 1-0 | 5-4 | 23-23 | | after a conference game | 7-5 | 28-27 | 102-85 | 5-6 | 29-24 | 61-57 | 8-4 | 38-18 | 165-87 | | revenging a road loss vs opponent | 2-3 | 6-8 | 30-24 | 4-1 | 9-4 | 20-15 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 47-30 | | off a loss against a conference rival | 2-2 | 7-7 | 29-23 | 3-1 | 11-3 | 23-13 | 3-1 | 9-5 | 40-14 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-12 | +1.3 | 9-8 | 8-6 | 75.6 | 34.0 | 48.2% | 34.7 | 77.0 | 33.8 | 46.4% | 34.6 | | Road Games | 5-8 | -1 | 4-6 | 4-4 | 72.4 | 32.5 | 46.6% | 32.5 | 82.8 | 36.8 | 48.9% | 35.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 70.2 | 30.2 | 47.8% | 32.0 | 69.8 | 32.8 | 42.5% | 34.0 | | Conference Games | 6-7 | +1.4 | 8-5 | 7-5 | 74.7 | 32.7 | 50.7% | 31.8 | 76.6 | 33.8 | 46.5% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.6 | 34.0 | 27-57 | 48.2% | 6-15 | 41.6% | 15-21 | 68.2% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 70.2 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 7-18 | 36.1% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.4 | 32.5 | 26-55 | 46.6% | 6-14 | 44.3% | 15-22 | 68.1% | 32 | 9 | 13 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.0 | 33.8 | 26-57 | 46.4% | 7-19 | 36.1% | 17-25 | 67.5% | 35 | 11 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.2 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.8 | 36.8 | 28-57 | 48.9% | 7-20 | 36.5% | 19-29 | 67.2% | 36 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 14-11 | +10.2 | 13-10 | 9-8 | 72.2 | 32.2 | 45.4% | 34.1 | 71.9 | 34.5 | 44.8% | 34.7 | | Home Games | 9-2 | +2.4 | 4-5 | 5-3 | 75.8 | 34.6 | 48.9% | 33.5 | 67.5 | 30.7 | 42.9% | 31.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 67.8 | 32.0 | 44.3% | 34.4 | 65.8 | 29.0 | 42.5% | 34.4 | | Conference Games | 8-5 | +1.5 | 7-6 | 5-7 | 72.0 | 31.8 | 45.5% | 33.8 | 70.5 | 32.2 | 44.6% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.2 | 32.2 | 25-55 | 45.4% | 6-17 | 35.5% | 16-24 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.7 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 15-21 | 69.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.8 | 34.6 | 25-51 | 48.9% | 6-15 | 39.6% | 20-28 | 70.8% | 33 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.9 | 34.5 | 26-57 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 37.8% | 14-19 | 70.8% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.6 | 33 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 70.1% | 34 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.5 | 30.7 | 23-54 | 42.9% | 7-18 | 38.7% | 14-19 | 75.0% | 31 | 9 | 12 | 24 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TENNESSEE TECH 67.1, AUSTIN PEAY 69.2 |
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| AUSTIN PEAY is 11-11 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | AUSTIN PEAY is 15-15 straight up against TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | 9 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TENNESSEE TECH is 3-2 against the spread versus AUSTIN PEAY over the last 3 seasons | | AUSTIN PEAY is 4-1 straight up against TENNESSEE TECH over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| AUSTIN PEAY is 5-4 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | AUSTIN PEAY is 8-4 straight up against TENNESSEE TECH since 1997 | | 4 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| AUSTIN PEAY is 1-1 against the spread versus TENNESSEE TECH over the last 3 seasons | | AUSTIN PEAY is 2-0 straight up against TENNESSEE TECH over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/21/2010 | AUSTIN PEAY | 90 | -3 | Over | 44 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 12-27 | 44.4% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 34 | 11 | 16 | | | TENNESSEE TECH | 94 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 35-63 | 55.6% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 19-32 | 59.4% | 41 | 16 | 15 | 2/9/2009 | AUSTIN PEAY | 86 | -1 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-55 | 54.5% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 33 | 6 | 13 | | | TENNESSEE TECH | 80 | 153 | Over | 33 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 36 | 13 | 15 | 1/22/2009 | TENNESSEE TECH | 71 | 156 | Over | 27 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 39 | 12 | 10 | | | AUSTIN PEAY | 87 | -7 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 39 | 8 | 12 | 2/16/2008 | TENNESSEE TECH | 76 | 149.5 | ATS | 41 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 23-32 | 71.9% | 38 | 9 | 20 | | | AUSTIN PEAY | 80 | -8 | SU Over | 47 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 19-34 | 55.9% | 34 | 8 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TENNESSEE TECH games 44.8% of the time since 1997. (87-107) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in TENNESSEE TECH games 53.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (31-27) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in AUSTIN PEAY games 44.6% of the time since 1997. (90-112) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in AUSTIN PEAY games 53.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (34-30) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in TENNESSEE TECH games 50.8% of the time since 1997. (63-61) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in TENNESSEE TECH games 44.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (25-31) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in AUSTIN PEAY games 49.3% of the time since 1997. (68-70) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in AUSTIN PEAY games 48.5% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (33-35) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 02/06/2010 - Terrell Barnes "?" Tuesday vs. Austin Peay ( Hand ) | | [G] 01/02/2010 - Will Barnes violation of team rules ( Dismissed ) | |
| [F] 01/07/2010 - Jim Ross out indefinitely ( Undisclosed ) | | [G] 11/14/2009 - James Harris dismissed from team ( Disciplinary ) |
|
|