|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| UTAH ST | | | | LOUISIANA TECH | -4 |  |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| when the line is +3 to -3 | 1-0 | 2-5 | 10-18 | 1-0 | 1-6 | 7-12 | 1-0 | 2-5 | 10-18 | | in all games | 9-0 | 20-13 | 80-80 | 2-7 | 12-20 | 42-55 | 8-2 | 19-16 | 66-138 | | after 2 or more consecutive straight up wins | 4-0 | 5-3 | 7-9 | 1-3 | 2-7 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 10-10 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 3-0 | 8-3 | 24-22 | 2-1 | 5-5 | 17-17 | 2-1 | 5-6 | 11-42 | | in weeks 10 through 13 | 1-0 | 4-3 | 21-22 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 14-15 | 1-0 | 7-1 | 24-24 | | in all lined games | 9-0 | 20-13 | 80-80 | 2-7 | 12-20 | 42-55 | 8-2 | 19-16 | 51-114 | | as a favorite | 5-0 | 8-8 | 20-22 | 1-4 | 7-9 | 9-17 | 6-0 | 14-4 | 30-14 | | as a road favorite | 2-0 | 3-2 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 4-6 | 2-0 | 5-1 | 9-5 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 2-3 | | in road games | 5-0 | 12-4 | 46-44 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 24-29 | 3-2 | 7-10 | 22-87 | | in road lined games | 5-0 | 12-4 | 46-44 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 24-29 | 3-2 | 7-10 | 19-74 | | against conference opponents | 4-0 | 9-9 | 45-44 | 2-2 | 8-10 | 26-34 | 4-0 | 11-8 | 42-60 | | when playing on a Saturday | 6-0 | 15-13 | 69-73 | 2-5 | 12-16 | 37-46 | 6-1 | 16-14 | 62-119 | | when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest | 0-0 | 2-3 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 14-17 | | after playing a conference game | 3-0 | 8-8 | 41-40 | 1-2 | 6-10 | 23-32 | 3-0 | 10-7 | 35-61 | | after a bye week | 0-0 | 2-3 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 14-21 | | in games played on turf | 8-0 | 11-1 | 24-22 | 2-6 | 5-7 | 13-13 | 8-1 | 10-4 | 22-40 | | in November games | 1-0 | 4-3 | 22-23 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 14-16 | 1-0 | 7-1 | 25-25 | | off a win against a conference rival | 3-0 | 5-4 | 17-14 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 8-12 | 3-0 | 8-2 | 16-18 |
|
|
|
|
| when the line is +3 to -3 | 2-0 | 5-2 | 13-13 | 2-0 | 5-2 | 11-8 | 2-0 | 5-2 | 12-14 | | in all games | 5-4 | 21-12 | 88-86 | 9-1 | 22-12 | 60-48 | 9-1 | 22-13 | 109-118 | | after 2 or more consecutive straight up wins | 3-2 | 10-3 | 20-19 | 6-0 | 10-4 | 17-8 | 5-1 | 10-4 | 24-21 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 1-1 | 6-3 | 27-23 | 2-0 | 6-3 | 18-13 | 1-1 | 3-6 | 14-40 | | in weeks 10 through 13 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 26-25 | 2-0 | 6-3 | 19-10 | 2-0 | 8-1 | 33-28 | | in all lined games | 5-4 | 21-12 | 88-86 | 9-1 | 22-12 | 60-48 | 9-1 | 21-13 | 81-96 | | as an underdog | 2-0 | 13-4 | 49-52 | 2-0 | 9-8 | 31-35 | 1-1 | 6-11 | 19-83 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 3-2 | | in home games | 1-2 | 7-7 | 37-26 | 4-0 | 11-4 | 27-15 | 4-0 | 9-6 | 61-29 | | in home lined games | 1-2 | 7-7 | 37-26 | 4-0 | 11-4 | 27-15 | 4-0 | 9-6 | 42-23 | | against conference opponents | 1-3 | 11-8 | 56-47 | 3-1 | 11-8 | 39-28 | 4-0 | 14-5 | 68-50 | | when playing on a Saturday | 5-4 | 19-12 | 77-80 | 9-1 | 20-12 | 52-41 | 9-1 | 22-11 | 102-106 | | when playing with 6 or less days rest | 4-4 | 16-10 | 65-63 | 8-1 | 17-10 | 45-31 | 8-1 | 18-9 | 80-80 | | after playing a conference game | 0-3 | 11-6 | 51-48 | 2-1 | 10-7 | 40-26 | 3-0 | 13-4 | 53-60 | | in games played on turf | 3-3 | 6-4 | 18-30 | 7-0 | 8-3 | 18-13 | 6-1 | 8-3 | 21-33 | | in November games | 0-2 | 5-4 | 27-26 | 2-0 | 6-3 | 20-10 | 2-0 | 8-1 | 33-30 | | off a win against a conference rival | 0-3 | 8-5 | 23-36 | 2-1 | 8-5 | 23-16 | 3-0 | 10-3 | 27-33 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 8-2 | +2.4 | 9-0 | 2-7 | 32.0 | 20.6 | 463.2 | (6.7) | 1.7 | 13.5 | 4.5 | 303.3 | (4.3) | 1.1 | | Road Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 29.0 | 17.8 | 399.6 | (5.8) | 1.6 | 17.0 | 6.4 | 343.0 | (4.6) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | 0 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 42.3 | 30.0 | 543.7 | (7.5) | 1.7 | 10.3 | 1.0 | 259.3 | (4.1) | 1.7 | | Turf Games | 7-1 | +3.4 | 7-0 | 1-6 | 33.6 | 22.0 | 483.4 | (7) | 1.6 | 14.0 | 4.5 | 294.2 | (4.2) | 1.0 | | Conference Games | 4-0 | +1.2 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 44.0 | 29.5 | 529.0 | (7.7) | 1.5 | 14.5 | 5.7 | 312.2 | (4.4) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 32.0 | 20.6 | 20.3 | 28:24 | 37-187 | (5.1) | 22-33 | 68.4% | 276 | (8.4) | 69-463 | (6.7) | (14.5) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.8 | 15 | 20.5 | 29:08 | 38-168 | (4.5) | 19-31 | 61.1% | 230 | (7.3) | 69-398 | (5.8) | (14.3) | | Offense Road Games | 29.0 | 17.8 | 18.8 | 27:30 | 32-154 | (4.8) | 24-36 | 66.9% | 246 | (6.8) | 68-400 | (5.8) | (13.8) | | Defense (All Games) | 13.5 | 4.5 | 17.0 | 31:36 | 36-95 | (2.6) | 19-35 | 54.7% | 209 | (6) | 71-303 | (4.3) | (22.5) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.5 | 13.5 | 19.1 | 31:59 | 36-139 | (3.9) | 19-32 | 59.5% | 223 | (7) | 68-362 | (5.4) | (14.2) | | Defense Road Games | 17.0 | 6.4 | 18.0 | 32:30 | 39-93 | (2.4) | 22-36 | 62.6% | 250 | (7) | 74-343 | (4.6) | (20.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-1 | +3.4 | 5-4 | 9-1 | 53.4 | 27.1 | 576.5 | (6.7) | 0.7 | 36.2 | 20.3 | 505.7 | (6.3) | 2.4 | | Home Games | 4-0 | 0 | 1-2 | 4-0 | 58.7 | 36.2 | 651.7 | (7.6) | 1.0 | 30.7 | 17.2 | 438.7 | (5.7) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +1 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 47.0 | 25.0 | 564.7 | (6.3) | 0.0 | 32.0 | 16.0 | 473.3 | (6.6) | 1.0 | | Turf Games | 6-1 | +1.4 | 3-3 | 7-0 | 58.0 | 31.9 | 607.4 | (7) | 1.0 | 37.3 | 22.7 | 476.3 | (6.1) | 2.3 | | Conference Games | 4-0 | +1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 52.7 | 32.7 | 633.2 | (6.9) | 0.7 | 31.0 | 17.2 | 431.0 | (6.3) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 53.4 | 27.1 | 31.4 | 28:17 | 45-244 | (5.4) | 29-41 | 70.6% | 332 | (8.1) | 86-576 | (6.7) | (10.8) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.7 | 17.1 | 22 | 30:05 | 39-182 | (4.6) | 20-33 | 60.4% | 251 | (7.6) | 72-432 | (6) | (13.2) | | Offense Home Games | 58.7 | 36.2 | 34.2 | 28:39 | 48-307 | (6.4) | 28-38 | 74.3% | 345 | (9.1) | 86-652 | (7.6) | (11.1) | | Defense (All Games) | 36.2 | 20.3 | 25.4 | 31:43 | 38-168 | (4.4) | 25-42 | 60.1% | 338 | (8) | 81-506 | (6.3) | (14) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26 | 14.5 | 20.3 | 30:06 | 36-150 | (4.2) | 21-36 | 58.7% | 241 | (6.8) | 72-392 | (5.5) | (15.1) | | Defense Home Games | 30.7 | 17.2 | 23.0 | 31:20 | 37-150 | (4) | 21-39 | 54.8% | 288 | (7.4) | 77-439 | (5.7) | (14.3) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UTAH ST 25.6, LOUISIANA TECH 24.2 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | @ COLORADO ST | 31-19 | W | -11.5 | W | 54 | U | 41-262 | 23-30-178 | 3 | 34-107 | 22-40-224 | 0 | | 9/29/2012 | UNLV | 35-13 | W | -22 | T | 56.5 | U | 36-140 | 21-34-424 | 2 | 35-117 | 18-39-188 | 1 | | 10/5/2012 | @ BYU | 3-6 | L | 6.5 | W | 45 | U | 24-41 | 22-39-202 | 2 | 45-145 | 24-36-235 | 1 | | 10/13/2012 | @ SAN JOSE ST | 49-27 | W | 2.5 | W | 51 | O | 24-212 | 26-35-273 | 1 | 41-4 | 38-51-467 | 1 | | 10/20/2012 | NEW MEXICO ST | 41-7 | W | -29.5 | W | 56.5 | U | 36-256 | 17-27-260 | 0 | 34-132 | 20-38-189 | 2 | | 10/27/2012 | @ UTSA | 48-17 | W | -23.5 | W | 52.5 | O | 37-128 | 32-42-394 | 2 | 28-51 | 21-36-248 | 2 | | 11/3/2012 | TEXAS ST | 38-7 | W | -26.5 | W | 53 | U | 47-268 | 21-28-325 | 3 | 31-82 | 10-23-76 | 1 | | 11/17/2012 | @ LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | IDAHO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 52-24 | W | 3 | W | 57 | O | 37-119 | 15-22-284 | 3 | 41-119 | 27-37-205 | 6 | | 9/29/2012 | @ VIRGINIA | 44-38 | W | -3.5 | W | 60 | O | 40-167 | 23-36-218 | 0 | 39-145 | 25-41-480 | 3 | | 10/6/2012 | UNLV | 58-31 | W | -27 | T | 70 | O | 51-306 | 31-46-316 | 0 | 39-158 | 22-46-378 | 2 | | 10/13/2012 | *TEXAS A&M | 57-59 | L | 9.5 | W | 77 | O | 42-165 | 44-59-450 | 0 | 46-283 | 24-40-395 | 2 | | 10/20/2012 | IDAHO | 70-28 | W | -30 | W | 73 | O | 53-408 | 32-42-431 | 3 | 23-47 | 21-36-257 | 4 | | 10/27/2012 | @ NEW MEXICO ST | 28-14 | W | -28.5 | L | 76.5 | U | 46-238 | 29-44-292 | 0 | 31-122 | 18-34-283 | 3 | | 11/3/2012 | UTSA | 51-27 | W | -30 | L | 72 | O | 39-180 | 31-40-357 | 0 | 33-124 | 23-41-314 | 0 | | 11/10/2012 | @ TEXAS ST | 62-55 | W | -19.5 | L | 69.5 | O | 55-283 | 32-46-344 | 0 | 39-296 | 22-38-281 | 0 | | 11/17/2012 | UTAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | @ SAN JOSE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| LOUISIANA TECH is 5-2 against the spread versus UTAH ST since 1992 | | LOUISIANA TECH is 6-3 straight up against UTAH ST since 1992 | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| LOUISIANA TECH is 2-0 against the spread versus UTAH ST over the last 3 seasons | | LOUISIANA TECH is 2-0 straight up against UTAH ST over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| LOUISIANA TECH is 2-1 against the spread versus UTAH ST since 1992 | | LOUISIANA TECH is 3-1 straight up against UTAH ST since 1992 | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| LOUISIANA TECH is 1-0 against the spread versus UTAH ST over the last 3 seasons | | LOUISIANA TECH is 1-0 straight up against UTAH ST over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/22/2011 | LOUISIANA TECH | 24 | 57 | SU ATS | 7 | 14 | 28:49 | 40-86 | 15-29 | 146 | 0 | 0 | 7-67 | | | UTAH ST | 17 | -6 | Under | 10 | 16 | 31:11 | 46-166 | 16-24 | 128 | 0 | 1 | 7-70 | | 10/9/2010 | UTAH ST | 6 | 56.5 | Under | 3 | 13 | 26:38 | 35-122 | 14-23 | 73 | 0 | 0 | 6-46 | | | LOUISIANA TECH | 24 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 17 | 27 | 33:22 | 47-278 | 20-32 | 149 | 0 | 1 | 8-93 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH ST games 52.4% of the time since 1992. (75-68) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in UTAH ST games 48.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (15-16) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISIANA TECH games 50.7% of the time since 1992. (76-74) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in LOUISIANA TECH games 59.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (16-11) | |
| No total has been posted for this game. |
|
|
|
|
| [LB] 08/04/2012 - Parker Hausknecht has left team ( Personal ) | |
| [RB] 09/24/2012 - Tevin King out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|