|
|
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
---|
|
|
|
All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
in all games | 8-9 | 85-93 | 685-668 | 7-10 | 85-94 | 676-668 | 8-9 | 94-87 | 738-645 | as an underdog | 2-6 | 39-46 | 293-293 | 3-5 | 43-44 | 303-289 | 1-7 | 29-58 | 197-407 | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-2 | 12-9 | 87-79 | 1-2 | 13-9 | 85-85 | 0-3 | 10-12 | 69-104 | in road games | 5-6 | 42-49 | 344-338 | 4-7 | 45-47 | 346-331 | 4-7 | 39-54 | 290-406 | in a road game where where the total is between 180 and 184.5 points | 1-2 | 7-6 | 45-45 | 2-1 | 11-2 | 59-34 | 1-2 | 7-6 | 45-48 | in December games | 0-1 | 5-13 | 105-105 | 1-0 | 6-14 | 115-94 | 0-1 | 8-12 | 107-110 | first half of the season | 8-9 | 23-27 | 225-211 | 7-10 | 17-35 | 218-212 | 8-9 | 25-27 | 235-212 | on Tuesday nights | 1-1 | 16-13 | 101-115 | 0-2 | 19-10 | 117-100 | 1-1 | 18-11 | 115-111 | when playing with 2 days rest | 1-1 | 8-16 | 110-112 | 1-1 | 16-9 | 113-108 | 1-1 | 9-16 | 122-109 | vs. division opponents | 0-1 | 14-19 | 170-195 | 0-1 | 15-20 | 176-184 | 0-1 | 19-16 | 208-172 | after a non-conference game | 3-5 | 26-28 | 215-212 | 3-5 | 26-29 | 211-215 | 3-5 | 25-31 | 219-224 | after a loss by 10 points or more | 3-0 | 21-22 | 129-135 | 1-2 | 21-23 | 123-143 | 2-1 | 23-21 | 129-148 | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 0-1 | 4-9 | 52-53 | 0-1 | 7-6 | 49-55 | 1-0 | 6-7 | 57-51 | when playing against a team with a winning record | 1-6 | 39-53 | 352-346 | 3-4 | 44-49 | 336-358 | 1-6 | 34-59 | 310-410 |
|
|
|
|
in all games | 4-11 | 102-82 | 684-667 | 5-10 | 81-104 | 673-680 | 8-7 | 131-54 | 675-696 | as a favorite | 3-7 | 81-69 | 309-307 | 4-6 | 72-79 | 299-323 | 7-3 | 115-36 | 460-166 | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-1 | 7-4 | 54-54 | 0-2 | 3-8 | 55-54 | 1-1 | 7-4 | 77-34 | in home games | 1-8 | 49-45 | 336-344 | 2-7 | 38-57 | 316-365 | 5-4 | 75-20 | 416-274 | in a home game where where the total is between 180 and 184.5 points | 0-3 | 9-10 | 48-60 | 0-3 | 7-12 | 48-62 | 2-1 | 15-4 | 62-49 | in December games | 0-1 | 10-11 | 101-115 | 0-1 | 7-14 | 104-111 | 1-0 | 16-5 | 107-111 | first half of the season | 4-11 | 24-26 | 199-231 | 5-10 | 17-33 | 193-235 | 8-7 | 32-18 | 190-246 | on Tuesday nights | 0-1 | 15-8 | 107-114 | 1-0 | 12-11 | 117-105 | 1-0 | 19-4 | 109-117 | when playing with 2 days rest | 1-4 | 16-19 | 121-134 | 1-4 | 19-16 | 128-128 | 3-2 | 25-10 | 122-138 | vs. division opponents | 2-1 | 24-14 | 202-172 | 1-2 | 16-22 | 191-182 | 2-1 | 34-4 | 189-192 | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 1-1 | 23-12 | 96-86 | 0-2 | 13-22 | 82-97 | 2-0 | 28-7 | 96-88 | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 1-2 | 19-7 | 71-65 | 2-1 | 12-14 | 80-57 | 2-1 | 21-5 | 70-68 | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-2 | 49-40 | 315-283 | 1-2 | 44-45 | 307-294 | 1-2 | 72-17 | 359-251 | versus poor offensive teams - scoring <=91 points/game | 0-0 | 11-5 | 95-95 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 109-81 | 0-0 | 15-1 | 83-109 |
|
|
|
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
---|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-9 | -4.2 | 8-9 | 7-10 | 90.9 | 43.9 | 41.4% | 56.4 | 91.9 | 45.5 | 40.8% | 52.2 | Road Games | 4-7 | -2.7 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 87.5 | 42.1 | 41.6% | 54.1 | 92.0 | 44.8 | 40.7% | 52.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 96.0 | 44.4 | 42.2% | 54.4 | 96.6 | 43.8 | 42.9% | 53.6 | Division Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 85.0 | 34.0 | 37.5% | 65.0 | 99.0 | 60.0 | 41.8% | 54.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 90.9 | 43.9 | 34-82 | 41.4% | 7-20 | 33.0% | 17-23 | 72.4% | 56 | 13 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.9 | 49.2 | 36-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 18-24 | 75.9% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 6 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.5 | 42.1 | 33-79 | 41.6% | 6-21 | 30.0% | 16-21 | 73.6% | 54 | 11 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 17 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.9 | 45.5 | 34-84 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 18-22 | 79.4% | 52 | 11 | 19 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 96.3 | 48.2 | 36-83 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 17-22 | 74.9% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 92.0 | 44.8 | 34-84 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 18-23 | 77.1% | 53 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-7 | -4.1 | 4-11 | 5-10 | 94.4 | 47.5 | 44.1% | 53.8 | 92.0 | 45.9 | 43.4% | 47.6 | Home Games | 5-4 | -4.3 | 1-8 | 2-7 | 92.6 | 46.1 | 43.4% | 53.6 | 89.6 | 44.9 | 43.0% | 46.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.4 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 93.6 | 49.4 | 43.5% | 56.6 | 87.6 | 43.4 | 42.2% | 47.0 | Division Games | 2-1 | +0.5 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 100.0 | 54.0 | 48.1% | 51.3 | 88.3 | 42.3 | 43.3% | 47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 94.4 | 47.5 | 36-81 | 44.1% | 4-12 | 32.0% | 19-24 | 78.9% | 54 | 13 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 98.4 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-19 | 36.7% | 18-23 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.6 | 46.1 | 35-80 | 43.4% | 4-11 | 37.1% | 19-24 | 78.6% | 54 | 12 | 23 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 92.0 | 45.9 | 36-82 | 43.4% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 15-20 | 77.3% | 48 | 11 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 97.1 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 76.6% | 50 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.6 | 44.9 | 35-81 | 43.0% | 4-16 | 28.4% | 15-18 | 82.4% | 46 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 94.9, CHICAGO 95.1 |
|
|
Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
---|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2012 | @ TORONTO | 90-88 | W | -1.5 | W | 190 | U | 37-78 | 47.4% | 53 | 18 | 33-91 | 36.3% | 54 | 10 | 11/2/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 89-90 | L | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 71 | 17 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 47 | 10 | 11/3/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 106-98 | W | -7.5 | W | 189 | O | 39-99 | 39.4% | 77 | 21 | 37-102 | 36.3% | 55 | 16 | 11/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 79-101 | L | 8.5 | L | 193.5 | U | 27-79 | 34.2% | 55 | 19 | 41-87 | 47.1% | 48 | 8 | 11/7/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 86-89 | L | 4 | W | 191.5 | U | 35-85 | 41.2% | 46 | 15 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 60 | 17 | 11/9/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 94-96 | L | 1.5 | L | 183 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 44 | 12 | 11/10/2012 | WASHINGTON | 89-85 | W | -8 | L | 186 | U | 34-80 | 42.5% | 57 | 12 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 45 | 12 | 11/13/2012 | TORONTO | 72-74 | L | -9 | L | 185.5 | U | 24-75 | 32.0% | 55 | 12 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 51 | 12 | 11/14/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 85-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 189.5 | U | 30-80 | 37.5% | 65 | 19 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 54 | 6 | 11/16/2012 | DALLAS | 103-83 | W | -2 | W | 188 | U | 39-83 | 47.0% | 55 | 8 | 30-81 | 37.0% | 56 | 11 | 11/18/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 76-88 | L | 7 | L | 185.5 | U | 28-71 | 39.4% | 54 | 19 | 33-90 | 36.7% | 56 | 8 | 11/19/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-89 | W | -3 | W | 180 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 54 | 20 | 31-87 | 35.6% | 50 | 10 | 11/21/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 115-107 | W | -7.5 | W | 181 | O | 40-92 | 43.5% | 61 | 8 | 39-92 | 42.4% | 56 | 9 | 11/23/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 97-104 | L | 4.5 | L | 190.5 | O | 38-92 | 41.3% | 58 | 13 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 47 | 10 | 11/27/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | 79-77 | W | 8.5 | W | 196 | U | 29-79 | 36.7% | 62 | 17 | 24-76 | 31.6% | 70 | 19 | 11/30/2012 | @ SACRAMENTO | 97-92 | W | -1.5 | W | 187 | O | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 50 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 92-103 | L | 5 | L | 188.5 | O | 34-74 | 45.9% | 42 | 16 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 12/4/2012 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2012 | PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2012 | DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/12/2012 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/15/2012 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/18/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/19/2012 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 93-87 | W | -6.5 | L | 191.5 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 56 | 18 | 34-84 | 40.5% | 51 | 19 | 11/2/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 115-86 | W | -2.5 | W | 183 | O | 44-69 | 63.8% | 48 | 17 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 44 | 17 | 11/3/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 82-89 | L | -9.5 | L | 181.5 | U | 29-88 | 33.0% | 55 | 12 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 54 | 16 | 11/6/2012 | ORLANDO | 99-93 | W | -9 | L | 187.5 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 55 | 9 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 50 | 11 | 11/8/2012 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 91-97 | L | 2.5 | L | 190 | U | 35-84 | 41.7% | 47 | 20 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 42 | 22 | 11/10/2012 | MINNESOTA | 87-80 | W | -8.5 | L | 184 | U | 34-80 | 42.5% | 55 | 14 | 33-85 | 38.8% | 50 | 11 | 11/12/2012 | BOSTON | 95-101 | L | -3 | L | 185 | O | 34-74 | 45.9% | 50 | 13 | 41-81 | 50.6% | 37 | 8 | 11/14/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 112-106 | W | -3 | W | 191.5 | O | 44-88 | 50.0% | 57 | 15 | 42-105 | 40.0% | 58 | 12 | 11/17/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 80-101 | L | 6.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-89 | 33.7% | 58 | 15 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 51 | 12 | 11/18/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 94-102 | L | 2 | L | 191 | O | 37-75 | 49.3% | 43 | 19 | 39-79 | 49.4% | 42 | 16 | 11/21/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 89-93 | L | 1 | L | 192 | U | 38-95 | 40.0% | 62 | 14 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 54 | 23 | 11/24/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 93-86 | W | 2.5 | W | 192 | U | 32-82 | 39.0% | 57 | 16 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 47 | 9 | 11/26/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 92-93 | L | -4 | L | 192 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 49 | 15 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 12 | 11/28/2012 | DALLAS | 101-78 | W | -6 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 40 | 14 | 12/1/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 93-88 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 59 | 13 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 43 | 11 | 12/4/2012 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
---|
|
|
CHICAGO is 38-34 against the spread versus INDIANA since 1996 | CHICAGO is 37-37 straight up against INDIANA since 1996 | 37 of 73 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
CHICAGO is 7-5 against the spread versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | CHICAGO is 9-3 straight up against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | 8 of 12 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
CHICAGO is 19-17 against the spread versus INDIANA since 1996 | CHICAGO is 27-11 straight up against INDIANA since 1996 | 19 of 37 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-3 against the spread versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | CHICAGO is 6-1 straight up against INDIANA over the last 3 seasons | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/25/2012 | CHICAGO | 92 | -3 | SU ATS | 49 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 50 | 9 | 13 | | INDIANA | 87 | 187.5 | Under | 36 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 43 | 7 | 9 | 03/05/2012 | INDIANA | 72 | 190 | Under | 43 | 27-79 | 34.2% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 42 | 7 | 7 | | CHICAGO | 92 | -7 | SU ATS | 42 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 17-27 | 63.0% | 72 | 18 | 16 | 01/25/2012 | INDIANA | 95 | 187 | SU ATS | 44 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 51 | 11 | 13 | | CHICAGO | 90 | -8 | Under | 54 | 36-90 | 40.0% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 58 | 15 | 12 |
|
|
|
Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
---|
|
|
The betting public is correct when moving the money line in INDIANA games 49.2% of the time since 1996. (525-543) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in INDIANA games 54.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (78-66) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.6% of the time since 1996. (497-548) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 48.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (71-76) | |
|
The betting public is correct when moving the total in INDIANA games 50.5% of the time since 1996. (599-587) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in INDIANA games 44.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (73-92) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 49.9% of the time since 1996. (599-601) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 52.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (86-77) | |
|
|
|
|
[F] 10/30/2012 - Danny Granger out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
[PG] 10/19/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 12/03/2012 - Richard Hamilton out indefinitely ( Foot ) |
|
|