|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 10-19 | 108-90 | 690-675 | 11-19 | 87-113 | 679-689 | 17-13 | 140-60 | 684-702 | | as an underdog | 4-7 | 21-16 | 368-360 | 3-8 | 10-27 | 370-354 | 4-7 | 16-21 | 208-530 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 0-2 | 2-5 | 56-57 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 64-50 | 0-2 | 0-7 | 29-86 | | in road games | 7-5 | 57-39 | 352-325 | 7-6 | 47-50 | 361-318 | 8-5 | 61-36 | 264-424 | | in a road game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 2-3 | 14-11 | 64-71 | 2-3 | 9-16 | 63-73 | 2-3 | 14-11 | 54-82 | | in January games | 0-0 | 21-13 | 123-107 | 1-0 | 17-19 | 113-119 | 1-0 | 28-8 | 126-108 | | on Friday nights | 3-0 | 20-9 | 114-119 | 3-0 | 14-15 | 114-121 | 3-0 | 22-7 | 116-123 | | against Southeast division opponents | 0-4 | 27-22 | 91-79 | 2-3 | 18-33 | 78-97 | 3-2 | 34-17 | 102-73 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-10 | 52-41 | 341-337 | 6-10 | 35-59 | 332-346 | 10-6 | 57-37 | 294-395 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 4-6 | 35-29 | 184-184 | 3-7 | 25-40 | 162-204 | 4-6 | 42-23 | 179-195 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 15-15 | 112-107 | 698-709 | 15-15 | 106-113 | 658-740 | 22-8 | 156-66 | 817-617 | | as a favorite | 14-15 | 101-93 | 430-434 | 15-14 | 93-100 | 415-439 | 21-8 | 145-51 | 637-243 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 5-2 | 22-19 | 93-95 | 2-5 | 21-19 | 87-95 | 6-1 | 30-11 | 144-47 | | in home games | 10-7 | 59-54 | 346-365 | 9-8 | 55-59 | 335-371 | 15-2 | 93-22 | 484-241 | | in a home game where where the total is between 190 and 194.5 points | 2-0 | 15-9 | 48-52 | 1-1 | 8-16 | 43-56 | 2-0 | 18-6 | 70-31 | | in January games | 0-1 | 14-17 | 110-114 | 1-0 | 21-11 | 120-104 | 1-0 | 22-10 | 122-106 | | on Friday nights | 1-2 | 16-16 | 130-128 | 1-2 | 13-18 | 124-130 | 1-2 | 24-8 | 144-117 | | against Central division opponents | 0-4 | 23-26 | 210-213 | 3-1 | 24-26 | 200-225 | 2-2 | 34-16 | 244-194 | | after a non-conference game | 11-3 | 36-33 | 229-216 | 5-9 | 32-37 | 222-222 | 13-1 | 48-23 | 258-199 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 3-7 | 14-20 | 102-94 | 7-3 | 20-15 | 99-99 | 6-4 | 21-14 | 116-88 | | after a win by 10 points or more | 7-3 | 47-40 | 193-203 | 3-7 | 35-50 | 171-222 | 7-3 | 64-24 | 246-159 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 6-6 | 35-36 | 135-134 | 6-6 | 28-41 | 116-152 | 9-3 | 48-23 | 178-98 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 6-7 | 64-60 | 357-375 | 4-9 | 58-67 | 330-402 | 8-5 | 78-49 | 355-398 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-13 | -8.4 | 10-19 | 11-19 | 92.4 | 45.9 | 43.6% | 51.7 | 91.6 | 45.2 | 43.1% | 49.6 | | Road Games | 8-5 | +4.2 | 7-5 | 7-6 | 94.9 | 47.2 | 45.1% | 51.0 | 94.2 | 45.8 | 43.9% | 49.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -8.6 | 0-4 | 2-3 | 87.2 | 43.8 | 41.2% | 47.0 | 94.8 | 48.6 | 47.2% | 54.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 92.4 | 45.9 | 35-80 | 43.6% | 5-13 | 34.7% | 18-22 | 79.7% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.4 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.9 | 47.2 | 36-80 | 45.1% | 4-14 | 30.7% | 19-23 | 80.3% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.6 | 45.2 | 35-81 | 43.1% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 75.4% | 50 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.8 | 48.7 | 37-82 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 94.2 | 45.8 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 15-21 | 73.7% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 22-8 | -3.8 | 15-15 | 15-15 | 103.6 | 52.1 | 49.2% | 47.4 | 98.6 | 50.6 | 44.2% | 49.2 | | Home Games | 15-2 | +3.4 | 10-7 | 9-8 | 107.2 | 53.5 | 50.6% | 45.8 | 96.9 | 50.3 | 43.8% | 49.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 104.0 | 49.8 | 46.8% | 49.2 | 104.8 | 51.6 | 46.3% | 52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 103.6 | 52.1 | 39-79 | 49.2% | 9-22 | 39.8% | 18-23 | 76.4% | 47 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.8 | 49.2 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 36.3% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 107.2 | 53.5 | 40-78 | 50.6% | 9-21 | 41.8% | 19-24 | 78.9% | 46 | 7 | 23 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 98.6 | 50.6 | 37-83 | 44.2% | 8-23 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.6 | 49.4 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 96.9 | 50.3 | 36-82 | 43.8% | 8-24 | 32.8% | 17-22 | 76.7% | 49 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 94.6, MIAMI 95.4 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 11/26/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 92-93 | L | -4 | L | 192 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 49 | 15 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 12 | | 11/28/2012 | DALLAS | 101-78 | W | -6 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 40 | 14 | | 12/1/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 93-88 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 59 | 13 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 43 | 11 | | 12/4/2012 | INDIANA | 76-80 | L | -4 | L | 180.5 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 95-85 | W | -3 | W | 183 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | 108-104 | W | -2 | W | 181 | O | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | 93-85 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 89-94 | L | 4 | L | 189 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 54 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 51 | 15 | | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 110-106 | W | 6 | W | 188 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 62 | 16 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 45 | 10 | | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 75-92 | L | 4 | L | 184 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 38 | 15 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 48 | 16 | | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | 97-120 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/29/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 105-100 | W | -13 | L | 201.5 | O | 42-86 | 48.8% | 42 | 10 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 55 | 19 | | 12/1/2012 | BROOKLYN | 102-89 | W | -8 | W | 192.5 | U | 40-78 | 51.3% | 38 | 10 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 56 | 18 | | 12/4/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 101-105 | L | -10 | L | 194.5 | O | 41-89 | 46.1% | 51 | 12 | 38-79 | 48.1% | 50 | 10 | | 12/6/2012 | NEW YORK | 92-112 | L | -9.5 | L | 199 | O | 32-76 | 42.1% | 51 | 14 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 7 | | 12/8/2012 | NEW ORLEANS | 106-90 | W | -14.5 | W | 194 | O | 40-69 | 58.0% | 42 | 16 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 36 | 17 | | 12/10/2012 | ATLANTA | 101-92 | W | -6.5 | W | 197.5 | U | 39-67 | 58.2% | 45 | 14 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 35 | 14 | | 12/12/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 95-97 | L | -8 | L | 206.5 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 38-81 | 46.9% | 45 | 13 | | 12/15/2012 | WASHINGTON | 102-72 | W | -15 | W | 196 | U | 40-79 | 50.6% | 51 | 12 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 44 | 21 | | 12/18/2012 | MINNESOTA | 103-92 | W | -8 | W | 200 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 34 | 8 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 66 | 19 | | 12/20/2012 | @ DALLAS | 110-95 | W | -5.5 | W | 203 | O | 42-78 | 53.8% | 56 | 18 | 37-96 | 38.5% | 44 | 9 | | 12/22/2012 | UTAH | 105-89 | W | -7.5 | W | 198.5 | U | 38-73 | 52.1% | 46 | 16 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 40 | 19 | | 12/25/2012 | OKLAHOMA CITY | 103-97 | W | -2.5 | W | 204 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 39 | 13 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 50 | 16 | | 12/26/2012 | @ CHARLOTTE | 105-92 | W | -9 | W | 200.5 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 50 | 13 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 53 | 16 | | 12/28/2012 | @ DETROIT | 99-109 | L | -6 | L | 189 | O | 39-77 | 50.6% | 36 | 14 | 43-74 | 58.1% | 43 | 14 | | 12/29/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 85-104 | L | -4 | L | 199.5 | U | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | | 12/31/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 112-110 | W | -9.5 | L | 194.5 | O | 40-85 | 47.1% | 47 | 7 | 42-88 | 47.7% | 57 | 16 | | 1/2/2013 | DALLAS | 119-109 | W | -10.5 | L | 204.5 | O | 42-89 | 47.2% | 53 | 9 | 41-94 | 43.6% | 56 | 13 | | 1/4/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 39-36 against the spread versus MIAMI since 1996 | | MIAMI is 43-35 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 41 of 78 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 6-5 against the spread versus MIAMI over the last 3 seasons | | MIAMI is 6-6 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 12 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| MIAMI is 21-16 against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | MIAMI is 28-10 straight up against CHICAGO since 1996 | | 22 of 38 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| MIAMI is 3-2 against the spread versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | MIAMI is 4-1 straight up against CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04/19/2012 | CHICAGO | 72 | 183.5 | Under | 40 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 2-16 | 12.5% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 48 | 7 | 13 | | | MIAMI | 83 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 55 | 9 | 12 | 04/12/2012 | MIAMI | 86 | 185 | Under | 41 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 10-16 | 62.5% | 55 | 10 | 17 | | | CHICAGO | 96 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 11-22 | 50.0% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 54 | 15 | 15 | 03/14/2012 | MIAMI | 102 | -3 | Over | 42 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 40 | 11 | 10 | | | CHICAGO | 106 | 189 | SU ATS | 53 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 10-19 | 52.6% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 53 | 14 | 15 | 01/29/2012 | CHICAGO | 93 | 191.5 | ATS | 51 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 54 | 12 | 15 | | | MIAMI | 97 | -4.5 | SU Under | 56 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 30-40 | 75.0% | 56 | 12 | 13 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 47.6% of the time since 1996. (503-553) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHICAGO games 48.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (77-81) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MIAMI games 49.1% of the time since 1996. (536-556) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MIAMI games 49.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (86-87) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 49.7% of the time since 1996. (603-610) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHICAGO games 51.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (90-86) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MIAMI games 52.5% of the time since 1996. (637-577) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MIAMI games 49.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (99-100) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 12/27/2012 - Derrick Rose out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 01/03/2013 - Joakim Noah missed last game, probable Friday vs. Miami ( Flu ) | | [F] 01/02/2013 - Vladimir Radmanovic probable Friday vs Miami ( Flu ) | |
| [F] 01/03/2013 - LeBron James probable Friday vs. Chicago ( Knee ) |
|
|