|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 14-20 | 86-93 | 687-669 | 16-18 | 83-99 | 703-659 | 12-23 | 85-98 | 792-597 | | as an underdog | 8-11 | 47-52 | 265-255 | 10-10 | 47-56 | 266-256 | 3-17 | 34-69 | 182-348 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 2-0 | 9-7 | 65-70 | 1-1 | 9-9 | 70-68 | 0-2 | 7-11 | 51-88 | | in road games | 7-8 | 44-43 | 348-328 | 10-6 | 41-49 | 349-330 | 2-14 | 33-57 | 324-366 | | in a road game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 1-2 | 4-6 | 34-39 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 40-37 | 0-4 | 3-9 | 31-46 | | in January games | 1-2 | 15-19 | 111-121 | 0-3 | 11-23 | 118-114 | 1-2 | 15-19 | 124-116 | | on Tuesday nights | 1-0 | 6-12 | 109-98 | 1-1 | 10-9 | 101-110 | 1-1 | 5-14 | 123-94 | | against Central division opponents | 2-4 | 14-9 | 97-99 | 2-4 | 9-14 | 93-102 | 3-3 | 15-8 | 122-78 | | in non-conference games | 7-10 | 33-31 | 225-225 | 9-8 | 32-33 | 235-217 | 6-11 | 33-32 | 283-178 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 3-0 | 10-9 | 85-61 | 2-1 | 13-8 | 74-73 | 2-1 | 8-13 | 87-66 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 3-6 | 25-20 | 123-124 | 4-5 | 20-26 | 122-121 | 3-6 | 26-20 | 139-116 | | after scoring 85 points or less | 2-4 | 5-11 | 62-66 | 2-4 | 4-12 | 63-63 | 3-3 | 7-9 | 68-63 | | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 4-0 | 14-7 | 80-65 | 2-2 | 9-12 | 82-61 | 2-2 | 11-10 | 87-60 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 15-16 | 85-92 | 627-670 | 14-18 | 83-94 | 675-624 | 16-16 | 82-98 | 609-718 | | as a favorite | 7-7 | 40-45 | 284-312 | 7-8 | 40-47 | 308-292 | 10-5 | 55-33 | 398-212 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 2-0 | 10-8 | 89-80 | 1-1 | 5-12 | 84-82 | 2-0 | 12-6 | 108-62 | | in home games | 6-10 | 38-51 | 303-344 | 9-8 | 41-49 | 350-300 | 9-8 | 48-43 | 377-283 | | in a home game where where the total is between 195 and 199.5 points | 3-4 | 8-8 | 48-62 | 4-4 | 8-9 | 61-50 | 5-3 | 11-6 | 62-51 | | in January games | 0-3 | 19-17 | 119-113 | 2-1 | 21-15 | 126-110 | 0-3 | 14-22 | 116-124 | | on Tuesday nights | 1-0 | 9-12 | 101-93 | 1-0 | 9-11 | 106-91 | 1-0 | 12-9 | 105-106 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 3-3 | 12-17 | 114-116 | 3-3 | 7-22 | 119-115 | 4-2 | 14-15 | 124-118 | | against Pacific division opponents | 1-1 | 8-10 | 76-97 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 91-84 | 1-1 | 7-11 | 66-113 | | after a division game | 2-6 | 15-24 | 164-201 | 5-3 | 19-20 | 182-179 | 3-5 | 21-18 | 174-204 | | in non-conference games | 1-9 | 18-40 | 184-240 | 6-4 | 22-34 | 233-192 | 2-8 | 18-40 | 172-267 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 5-3 | 21-18 | 151-145 | 5-4 | 19-21 | 148-150 | 6-3 | 18-23 | 136-173 | | after scoring 85 points or less | 3-1 | 19-15 | 111-92 | 4-1 | 17-19 | 99-103 | 4-1 | 17-19 | 101-112 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 1-1 | 15-6 | 109-74 | 0-2 | 7-14 | 91-93 | 1-1 | 14-7 | 97-93 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 6-6 | 44-37 | 276-307 | 2-10 | 37-43 | 304-281 | 6-6 | 50-32 | 340-263 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 4-5 | 28-33 | 186-173 | 4-5 | 26-33 | 180-179 | 3-6 | 32-29 | 203-168 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 12-23 | -11.7 | 14-20 | 16-18 | 96.3 | 49.1 | 44.8% | 48.0 | 100.4 | 51.0 | 47.2% | 52.5 | | Road Games | 2-14 | -12.1 | 7-8 | 10-6 | 96.4 | 50.1 | 44.8% | 48.1 | 106.6 | 52.5 | 47.8% | 53.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 91.8 | 47.4 | 44.9% | 47.4 | 98.6 | 50.0 | 48.6% | 50.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 96.3 | 49.1 | 38-85 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-19 | 74.9% | 48 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 97.1 | 48.9 | 36-82 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-23 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 96.4 | 50.1 | 38-85 | 44.8% | 6-19 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 73.8% | 48 | 11 | 22 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 100.4 | 51.0 | 39-82 | 47.2% | 7-17 | 39.4% | 17-22 | 74.4% | 53 | 11 | 23 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 97.3 | 48.7 | 37-82 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-23 | 75.5% | 51 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 106.6 | 52.5 | 40-84 | 47.8% | 8-19 | 41.3% | 19-25 | 75.1% | 54 | 12 | 24 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 16-16 | -0.2 | 15-16 | 14-18 | 95.9 | 49.3 | 43.2% | 51.9 | 97.2 | 47.9 | 44.5% | 53.2 | | Home Games | 9-8 | -1.8 | 6-10 | 9-8 | 97.8 | 50.1 | 43.1% | 52.6 | 98.4 | 48.5 | 45.3% | 53.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 97.8 | 51.6 | 43.7% | 49.8 | 101.6 | 53.4 | 48.1% | 53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 95.9 | 49.3 | 37-86 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-21 | 74.7% | 52 | 13 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 96.2 | 48.3 | 36-81 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 97.8 | 50.1 | 37-87 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 53 | 13 | 23 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.2 | 47.9 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 18-23 | 77.6% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 96.1 | 48.2 | 36-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 98.4 | 48.5 | 37-81 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 34.1% | 19-25 | 75.7% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 94.9, MILWAUKEE 95.3 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 11/30/2012 | @ TORONTO | 97-101 | L | 3 | L | 199.5 | U | 37-77 | 48.1% | 41 | 14 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 50 | 13 | | 12/2/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 99-106 | L | 11.5 | W | 200 | O | 39-80 | 48.7% | 52 | 17 | 40-90 | 44.4% | 48 | 7 | | 12/4/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 98-108 | L | 10 | T | 196 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 39 | 16 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 63 | 19 | | 12/6/2012 | DALLAS | 94-97 | L | -4 | L | 204.5 | U | 34-85 | 40.0% | 52 | 12 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 16 | | 12/8/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 99-117 | L | 10.5 | L | 200 | O | 36-78 | 46.2% | 47 | 20 | 48-93 | 51.6% | 52 | 11 | | 12/9/2012 | ORLANDO | 90-98 | L | -4.5 | L | 198 | U | 36-78 | 46.2% | 36 | 12 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 53 | 18 | | 12/12/2012 | MEMPHIS | 82-80 | W | 6.5 | W | 194 | U | 34-89 | 38.2% | 50 | 11 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 47 | 15 | | 12/14/2012 | UTAH | 99-84 | W | 2 | W | 202.5 | U | 38-83 | 45.8% | 49 | 12 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 56 | 15 | | 12/17/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 101-90 | W | -7 | W | 197 | U | 41-85 | 48.2% | 44 | 7 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 58 | 16 | | 12/19/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 121-104 | W | -9 | W | 198.5 | O | 47-85 | 55.3% | 36 | 11 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 15 | | 12/22/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 93-96 | L | 4.5 | W | 196 | U | 40-89 | 44.9% | 40 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 53 | 21 | | 12/23/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 77-103 | L | 6.5 | L | 195.5 | U | 29-80 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 55 | 16 | | 12/26/2012 | NEW YORK | 97-99 | L | -2 | L | 195 | O | 38-83 | 45.8% | 50 | 13 | 40-88 | 45.5% | 50 | 11 | | 12/28/2012 | @ INDIANA | 91-97 | L | 8 | W | 188.5 | U | 38-82 | 46.3% | 44 | 11 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 54 | 15 | | 12/29/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 107-111 | L | 8.5 | W | 194.5 | O | 45-97 | 46.4% | 55 | 4 | 45-89 | 50.6% | 60 | 10 | | 12/31/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 96-114 | L | 12.5 | L | 206.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 46 | 13 | 44-87 | 50.6% | 44 | 5 | | 1/2/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 95-89 | W | -4.5 | W | 195 | U | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 13 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 16 | | 1/4/2013 | UTAH | 80-87 | L | -1.5 | L | 198 | U | 34-75 | 45.3% | 48 | 20 | 40-89 | 44.9% | 48 | 10 | | 1/6/2013 | MEMPHIS | 81-92 | L | 4.5 | L | 184.5 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 37 | 14 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 51 | 17 | | 1/8/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/30/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-95 | L | 1.5 | L | 194.5 | U | 34-93 | 36.6% | 57 | 11 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 67 | 15 | | 12/1/2012 | BOSTON | 91-88 | W | -3 | T | 196 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 49 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 50 | 16 | | 12/3/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-102 | L | -4 | L | 188.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 16 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 46 | 8 | | 12/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 99-110 | L | 9 | L | 202.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | | 12/7/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 108-93 | W | -7.5 | W | 197.5 | O | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | | 12/9/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 97-88 | W | 6 | W | 194 | U | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 18 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 57 | 20 | | 12/12/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 98-85 | W | -7.5 | W | 198 | U | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | | 12/14/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-86 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | | 12/15/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 85-111 | L | 5 | L | 195 | O | 30-83 | 36.1% | 50 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 54 | 11 | | 12/18/2012 | INDIANA | 98-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | | 12/19/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 80-90 | L | 9 | L | 187.5 | U | 30-85 | 35.3% | 55 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 60 | 16 | | 12/21/2012 | @ BOSTON | 99-94 | W | 5 | W | 191 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 72 | 21 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 50 | 14 | | 12/22/2012 | CLEVELAND | 82-94 | L | -8 | L | 197 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | | 12/26/2012 | BROOKLYN | 108-93 | W | -5 | W | 187 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 52 | 18 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 50 | 15 | | 12/29/2012 | MIAMI | 104-85 | W | 4 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | | 12/30/2012 | @ DETROIT | 94-96 | L | 2.5 | W | 191 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | | 1/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 110-117 | L | 5.5 | L | 204 | O | 43-88 | 48.9% | 53 | 16 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 47 | 8 | | 1/4/2013 | HOUSTON | 101-115 | L | 0 | L | 214 | O | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | | 1/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | 80-95 | L | 4.5 | L | 187.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 49 | 13 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 67 | 12 | | 1/8/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| PHOENIX is 18-12 against the spread versus MILWAUKEE since 1996 | | PHOENIX is 26-5 straight up against MILWAUKEE since 1996 | | 17 of 30 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 4-0 against the spread versus MILWAUKEE over the last 3 seasons | | PHOENIX is 4-0 straight up against MILWAUKEE over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| PHOENIX is 10-5 against the spread versus MILWAUKEE since 1996 | | PHOENIX is 11-5 straight up against MILWAUKEE since 1996 | | 8 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| PHOENIX is 2-0 against the spread versus MILWAUKEE over the last 3 seasons | | PHOENIX is 2-0 straight up against MILWAUKEE over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/07/2012 | PHOENIX | 107 | 194.5 | SU ATS | 67 | 45-94 | 47.9% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 8-8 | 100.0% | 48 | 16 | 12 | | | MILWAUKEE | 105 | -8.5 | Over | 50 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 45 | 10 | 13 | 01/08/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 93 | 185 | Over | 47 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 52 | 15 | 13 | | | PHOENIX | 109 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 57 | 43-77 | 55.8% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 43 | 7 | 14 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PHOENIX games 51.7% of the time since 1996. (548-511) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in PHOENIX games 55.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (78-63) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MILWAUKEE games 51% of the time since 1996. (511-491) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in MILWAUKEE games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (68-68) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in PHOENIX games 48.9% of the time since 1996. (600-627) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in PHOENIX games 44.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (74-92) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MILWAUKEE games 51.1% of the time since 1996. (594-568) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in MILWAUKEE games 48.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (79-83) | |
|
|
|
|
| [F] 12/27/2012 - Channing Frye out for season ( Heart ) | |
| [F] 01/07/2013 - Ersan Ilyasova is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. Phoenix ( Ankle ) |
|
|