|
|
The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
---|
|
|
|
CLEVELAND | |  | SACRAMENTO | -1 | |
|
|
|
All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
in all games | 17-21 | 83-98 | 668-672 | 20-18 | 93-92 | 660-675 | 9-29 | 49-137 | 653-711 | as an underdog | 16-17 | 76-80 | 343-377 | 18-15 | 81-79 | 358-354 | 8-25 | 40-121 | 200-530 | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-4 | 8-8 | 66-70 | 3-2 | 8-8 | 59-72 | 0-5 | 6-10 | 45-91 | in road games | 13-9 | 50-43 | 332-340 | 13-9 | 53-42 | 335-332 | 5-17 | 22-74 | 246-438 | in a road game where where the total is between 200 and 204.5 points | 2-2 | 8-6 | 37-32 | 3-1 | 8-6 | 32-37 | 1-3 | 2-12 | 24-46 | in January games | 3-3 | 18-20 | 110-112 | 3-3 | 23-16 | 119-107 | 2-4 | 9-30 | 104-126 | against Pacific division opponents | 3-3 | 11-11 | 96-85 | 3-3 | 9-13 | 92-87 | 2-4 | 8-14 | 90-93 | in non-conference games | 5-8 | 24-35 | 223-213 | 5-8 | 28-32 | 224-209 | 2-11 | 14-47 | 213-234 | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 6-5 | 26-28 | 126-132 | 6-5 | 29-27 | 136-121 | 3-8 | 14-42 | 92-172 | revenging a loss vs opponent | 12-13 | 52-67 | 330-345 | 13-12 | 56-67 | 331-339 | 6-19 | 29-94 | 276-414 | when playing against a team with a losing record | 5-8 | 41-42 | 297-294 | 6-7 | 41-43 | 311-277 | 3-10 | 29-56 | 357-251 | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 5-6 | 28-28 | 199-172 | 7-4 | 27-28 | 182-188 | 2-9 | 20-36 | 239-140 |
|
|
|
|
in all games | 16-20 | 83-100 | 660-662 | 23-13 | 103-81 | 691-632 | 13-24 | 59-126 | 652-696 | as a favorite | 2-4 | 12-20 | 310-302 | 3-4 | 15-18 | 308-314 | 4-3 | 17-16 | 440-187 | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 0-0 | 4-7 | 67-63 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 75-56 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 87-47 | in home games | 8-11 | 38-54 | 335-323 | 14-6 | 55-39 | 351-310 | 10-10 | 37-57 | 410-262 | in a home game where where the total is between 200 and 204.5 points | 2-2 | 6-6 | 56-53 | 4-0 | 11-1 | 63-47 | 2-2 | 6-6 | 73-38 | in January games | 3-4 | 20-20 | 113-117 | 6-1 | 19-21 | 119-109 | 2-5 | 13-27 | 117-119 | against Central division opponents | 3-4 | 11-13 | 97-91 | 4-3 | 13-11 | 94-97 | 2-5 | 7-17 | 106-91 | after a non-conference game | 8-6 | 35-26 | 212-231 | 7-7 | 35-27 | 230-213 | 7-8 | 27-36 | 209-250 | in non-conference games | 8-8 | 31-33 | 212-235 | 11-5 | 40-24 | 234-216 | 7-9 | 22-42 | 234-226 | after 3 or more consecutive overs | 3-3 | 13-15 | 76-75 | 4-2 | 18-10 | 76-75 | 2-4 | 9-19 | 74-82 | after allowing 105 points or more | 4-7 | 37-42 | 245-252 | 7-5 | 43-37 | 250-248 | 4-8 | 26-54 | 236-281 | after a loss by 10 points or more | 5-10 | 26-36 | 173-164 | 11-4 | 35-27 | 176-158 | 4-11 | 20-42 | 158-190 | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 2-2 | 12-11 | 88-82 | 3-0 | 15-8 | 101-70 | 1-3 | 7-17 | 83-100 | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 3-5 | 27-26 | 96-111 | 6-3 | 30-25 | 105-103 | 4-5 | 20-35 | 84-133 | when playing against a team with a losing record | 7-8 | 32-38 | 258-262 | 9-6 | 36-35 | 266-260 | 7-8 | 29-42 | 324-218 | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 5-7 | 31-33 | 190-189 | 8-5 | 36-30 | 190-192 | 7-6 | 25-41 | 201-196 |
|
|
|
Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
---|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-29 | -12.5 | 17-21 | 20-18 | 94.5 | 48.7 | 41.9% | 51.6 | 99.8 | 49.2 | 47.1% | 50.7 | Road Games | 5-17 | -4.4 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 94.6 | 50.0 | 42.2% | 49.8 | 100.4 | 50.9 | 47.9% | 50.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 98.4 | 53.4 | 44.1% | 46.0 | 103.0 | 48.0 | 46.7% | 55.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 94.5 | 48.7 | 35-84 | 41.9% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 16-22 | 74.2% | 52 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.7 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.7% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.6 | 50.0 | 35-84 | 42.2% | 8-22 | 35.0% | 16-22 | 74.5% | 50 | 13 | 18 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.8 | 49.2 | 37-78 | 47.1% | 7-20 | 36.4% | 19-25 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 96.5 | 48.7 | 37-82 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 74.9% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 100.4 | 50.9 | 37-77 | 47.9% | 7-19 | 37.0% | 19-25 | 76.3% | 50 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-24 | -7 | 16-20 | 23-13 | 97.0 | 47.3 | 43.8% | 49.2 | 103.2 | 51.4 | 45.7% | 52.7 | Home Games | 10-10 | +1.2 | 8-11 | 14-6 | 100.4 | 49.3 | 45.8% | 49.2 | 104.0 | 49.1 | 46.4% | 49.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 1-4 | 5-0 | 98.0 | 47.8 | 44.4% | 49.2 | 113.4 | 55.4 | 47.4% | 52.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 97.0 | 47.3 | 37-83 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 76.8% | 49 | 12 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97 | 48.6 | 37-82 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 17-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 100.4 | 49.3 | 38-82 | 45.8% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 18-24 | 76.4% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 103.2 | 51.4 | 38-82 | 45.7% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 20-25 | 79.2% | 53 | 13 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 97.9 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-23 | 75.3% | 51 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 104.0 | 49.1 | 37-81 | 46.4% | 9-23 | 38.0% | 21-25 | 81.0% | 49 | 11 | 24 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CLEVELAND 96, SACRAMENTO 95.1 |
|
|
Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
---|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2012 | CHICAGO | 85-95 | L | 3 | L | 183 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 12/7/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 73-91 | L | 8.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-87 | 34.5% | 49 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 59 | 21 | 12/8/2012 | DETROIT | 97-104 | L | 1 | L | 187 | O | 39-91 | 42.9% | 58 | 14 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 46 | 9 | 12/11/2012 | LA LAKERS | 100-94 | W | 6.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 54 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 63 | 18 | 12/12/2012 | @ INDIANA | 81-96 | L | 7.5 | L | 189 | U | 27-81 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 63 | 13 | 12/14/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 86-90 | L | 3 | L | 196 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 102-103 | L | 10 | W | 193.5 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 52 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 12/18/2012 | TORONTO | 99-113 | L | -5 | L | 189 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 42 | 15 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 9 | L | 191 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 48 | 9 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 43 | 14 | 12/21/2012 | INDIANA | 89-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 187 | O | 32-80 | 40.0% | 47 | 16 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 57 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 94-82 | W | 8 | W | 197 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 12/26/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-84 | W | 1 | W | 188.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 47 | 10 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 57 | 20 | 12/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 94-102 | L | 5.5 | L | 189.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 50 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-103 | L | 8.5 | W | 190 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 12 | 1/2/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 94-97 | L | -3.5 | L | 200 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 60 | 13 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 51 | 10 | 1/4/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 106-104 | W | 1.5 | W | 196.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 47 | 13 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | HOUSTON | 104-112 | L | 6 | L | 213 | O | 36-91 | 39.6% | 54 | 13 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 56 | 17 | 1/7/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 92-118 | L | 8 | L | 186 | O | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 1/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 99-83 | W | 4 | W | 193 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 49 | 10 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 52 | 13 | 1/11/2013 | @ DENVER | 91-98 | L | 12.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 37-85 | 43.5% | 44 | 15 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 63 | 22 | 1/13/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2012 | TORONTO | 107-100 | W | -2.5 | W | 198 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 61 | 15 | 35-86 | 40.7% | 47 | 11 | 12/7/2012 | ORLANDO | 91-82 | W | -3 | W | 194 | U | 32-79 | 40.5% | 59 | 18 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 46 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 99-80 | W | 7 | W | 197 | U | 36-86 | 41.9% | 55 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 18 | 12/10/2012 | @ DALLAS | 96-119 | L | 6.5 | L | 200.5 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 51 | 19 | 48-87 | 55.2% | 46 | 8 | 12/12/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 85-98 | L | 7.5 | L | 198 | U | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 12/14/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 103-113 | L | 13 | W | 203 | O | 34-75 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 52 | 18 | 12/16/2012 | DENVER | 97-122 | L | 4.5 | L | 204.5 | O | 31-91 | 34.1% | 50 | 9 | 46-85 | 54.1% | 61 | 11 | 12/17/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 90-101 | L | 7 | L | 197 | U | 34-83 | 41.0% | 58 | 16 | 41-85 | 48.2% | 44 | 7 | 12/19/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 131-127 | W | 3.5 | W | 201 | O | 43-86 | 50.0% | 51 | 9 | 46-92 | 50.0% | 49 | 12 | 12/21/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 85-97 | L | 13 | W | 202 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 42 | 16 | 37-87 | 42.5% | 67 | 19 | 12/23/2012 | PORTLAND | 108-96 | W | 0 | W | 195 | O | 45-81 | 55.6% | 42 | 14 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 46 | 17 | 12/26/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 91-109 | L | 7.5 | L | 198.5 | O | 35-86 | 40.7% | 40 | 10 | 44-87 | 50.6% | 63 | 17 | 12/28/2012 | NEW YORK | 106-105 | W | 3 | W | 198.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 45 | 11 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 56 | 17 | 12/30/2012 | BOSTON | 118-96 | W | 3 | W | 193.5 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 52 | 13 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 12 | 1/1/2013 | @ DETROIT | 97-103 | L | 7 | W | 195.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 44 | 13 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 52 | 17 | 1/2/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | 97-94 | W | 3.5 | W | 200 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 51 | 10 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 60 | 13 | 1/4/2013 | @ TORONTO | 105-96 | W | 7 | W | 196 | O | 40-76 | 52.6% | 52 | 17 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 54 | 15 | 1/5/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 93-113 | L | 7 | L | 195.5 | O | 36-90 | 40.0% | 51 | 9 | 44-85 | 51.8% | 55 | 12 | 1/7/2013 | MEMPHIS | 81-113 | L | 4 | L | 188.5 | O | 28-76 | 36.8% | 44 | 14 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 51 | 8 | 1/10/2013 | DALLAS | 112-117 | L | -2.5 | L | 205 | O | 40-81 | 49.4% | 48 | 20 | 41-96 | 42.7% | 60 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | MIAMI | 99-128 | L | 7.5 | L | 203.5 | O | 38-87 | 43.7% | 51 | 17 | 45-80 | 56.2% | 41 | 10 | 1/14/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
---|
|
|
SACRAMENTO is 15-14 against the spread versus CLEVELAND since 1996 | CLEVELAND is 16-13 straight up against SACRAMENTO since 1996 | 17 of 28 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
SACRAMENTO is 2-1 against the spread versus CLEVELAND over the last 3 seasons | CLEVELAND is 2-1 straight up against SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
CLEVELAND is 8-6 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO since 1996 | CLEVELAND is 8-6 straight up against SACRAMENTO since 1996 | 8 of 14 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
CLEVELAND is 1-0 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | CLEVELAND is 1-0 straight up against SACRAMENTO over the last 3 seasons | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/19/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 92 | 199.5 | ATS | 49 | 35-93 | 37.6% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 64 | 18 | 12 | | CLEVELAND | 93 | -1.5 | SU Under | 50 | 32-89 | 36.0% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 22-30 | 73.3% | 66 | 19 | 11 |
|
|
|
Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
---|
|
|
The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CLEVELAND games 50.4% of the time since 1996. (540-531) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CLEVELAND games 50% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (72-72) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 48.8% of the time since 1996. (517-542) | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 49.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (68-70) | |
|
The betting public is correct when moving the total in CLEVELAND games 48.5% of the time since 1996. (567-601) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CLEVELAND games 50.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (84-83) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 51.3% of the time since 1996. (592-562) | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 53.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (87-75) | |
|
|
|
|
[C] 01/10/2013 - Anderson Varejao expected to miss 6-8 weeks ( Knee ) | [G] 01/12/2013 - Kyrie Irving probable Sunday vs. LA Lakers ( Illness ) | |
[G] 01/13/2013 - Aaron Brooks "?" Monday vs. Cleveland ( Flu ) |
|
|