|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| WASHINGTON | | | | CHARLOTTE | -13 |  |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 19-29 | 98-116 | 507-572 | 18-29 | 103-112 | 540-528 | 17-32 | 81-138 | 461-642 | | as an underdog | 16-17 | 71-74 | 308-340 | 12-21 | 66-82 | 314-332 | 11-23 | 46-104 | 184-480 | | as a road underdog of 6.5 to 9 points | 3-2 | 13-10 | 57-52 | 1-4 | 10-15 | 47-66 | 3-2 | 9-16 | 29-84 | | in road games | 10-13 | 50-54 | 267-274 | 7-16 | 47-60 | 257-278 | 8-16 | 33-76 | 177-375 | | in a road game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points | 0-1 | 2-13 | 31-51 | 0-1 | 6-9 | 40-43 | 0-1 | 1-14 | 21-63 | | in February games | 1-2 | 12-17 | 70-83 | 0-3 | 15-14 | 77-72 | 1-2 | 9-20 | 57-100 | | second half of the season | 1-2 | 35-44 | 243-260 | 0-3 | 44-37 | 259-237 | 1-2 | 31-50 | 209-306 | | on Tuesday nights | 4-6 | 15-15 | 78-89 | 3-7 | 13-17 | 81-86 | 5-5 | 13-17 | 70-103 | | when playing with 3 or more days rest | 2-2 | 9-8 | 27-46 | 3-1 | 11-6 | 33-36 | 1-3 | 6-11 | 29-46 | | vs. division opponents | 3-6 | 15-26 | 115-159 | 1-8 | 13-27 | 127-140 | 3-6 | 14-27 | 108-174 | | after a division game | 3-5 | 22-15 | 131-138 | 4-4 | 15-24 | 123-140 | 2-6 | 16-24 | 116-164 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 1-6 | 14-18 | 62-58 | 3-4 | 16-19 | 65-59 | 2-5 | 12-23 | 56-70 | | revenging a home loss vs opponent | 3-9 | 24-36 | 117-130 | 4-7 | 30-30 | 128-116 | 3-9 | 16-45 | 86-168 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 11-22 | 58-75 | 284-318 | 13-20 | 63-70 | 312-282 | 10-24 | 45-90 | 239-379 | | off an upset win as an underdog | 1-9 | 14-31 | 80-100 | 4-6 | 22-23 | 88-92 | 2-8 | 9-36 | 75-108 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 11-12 | 52-45 | 242-248 | 8-14 | 51-47 | 254-231 | 10-14 | 50-50 | 277-229 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 1-3 | 19-20 | 120-122 | 0-4 | 24-17 | 126-112 | 2-2 | 22-19 | 133-115 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 29-20 | 111-99 | 239-211 | 29-19 | 109-101 | 239-212 | 24-25 | 91-122 | 168-291 | | as a favorite | 12-8 | 35-30 | 55-44 | 13-6 | 37-26 | 55-41 | 16-4 | 46-19 | 68-31 | | as a home favorite of 6.5 to 9 points | 1-3 | 5-8 | 6-8 | 3-1 | 8-5 | 8-6 | 3-1 | 9-4 | 10-4 | | in home games | 14-10 | 57-48 | 120-105 | 14-10 | 54-50 | 118-106 | 18-6 | 62-44 | 113-116 | | in a home game where where the total is between 185 and 189.5 points | 3-2 | 13-11 | 22-20 | 3-2 | 12-12 | 24-18 | 5-0 | 13-11 | 18-25 | | in February games | 1-2 | 11-15 | 31-30 | 2-1 | 18-9 | 35-27 | 0-3 | 7-21 | 18-47 | | second half of the season | 1-2 | 35-37 | 100-83 | 2-1 | 40-33 | 99-84 | 0-3 | 30-44 | 70-118 | | on Tuesday nights | 5-3 | 16-15 | 32-32 | 5-3 | 16-15 | 36-29 | 6-2 | 18-13 | 33-32 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 7-7 | 19-20 | 35-45 | 10-4 | 23-17 | 46-36 | 7-7 | 22-18 | 30-52 | | vs. division opponents | 5-3 | 22-18 | 50-37 | 5-3 | 19-21 | 47-40 | 4-4 | 16-24 | 37-51 | | after a non-conference game | 13-4 | 45-30 | 91-72 | 10-6 | 38-37 | 90-72 | 10-7 | 34-43 | 62-105 | | off a upset loss as a favorite | 1-2 | 8-10 | 15-14 | 2-1 | 9-8 | 16-11 | 1-2 | 7-11 | 11-18 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 5-2 | 19-21 | 64-56 | 4-3 | 22-17 | 69-51 | 3-4 | 16-25 | 37-85 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 14-6 | 55-42 | 118-97 | 10-9 | 50-47 | 116-97 | 12-8 | 53-46 | 101-117 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 2-0 | 23-17 | 61-41 | 1-0 | 19-20 | 50-48 | 2-0 | 23-18 | 52-51 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 16-7 | 55-38 | 105-75 | 14-8 | 45-48 | 89-92 | 15-8 | 53-42 | 84-99 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 3-2 | 23-23 | 56-41 | 4-0 | 23-23 | 47-50 | 3-2 | 23-25 | 47-52 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 17-32 | -6.2 | 19-29 | 18-29 | 97.6 | 47.5 | 44.5% | 50.9 | 101.9 | 51.4 | 45.9% | 50.9 | | Road Games | 8-16 | +5.1 | 10-13 | 7-16 | 96.5 | 47.6 | 43.6% | 51.2 | 102.7 | 51.3 | 44.6% | 54.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +6.6 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 90.4 | 46.0 | 43.5% | 49.2 | 94.4 | 46.0 | 46.9% | 46.0 | | Division Games | 3-6 | +4.3 | 3-6 | 1-8 | 87.8 | 42.0 | 41.2% | 51.8 | 94.8 | 49.0 | 44.7% | 49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 97.6 | 47.5 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 19-24 | 76.9% | 51 | 12 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 99.4 | 50.6 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 19-25 | 75.9% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 96.5 | 47.6 | 36-83 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 19-25 | 76.2% | 51 | 11 | 17 | 23 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 101.9 | 51.4 | 38-82 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 36.9% | 19-25 | 76.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 99.2 | 50.7 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 18-24 | 75.6% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 102.7 | 51.3 | 37-84 | 44.6% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 22-28 | 76.9% | 54 | 12 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-25 | +2.6 | 29-20 | 29-19 | 95.1 | 48.6 | 45.1% | 50.3 | 94.2 | 48.0 | 44.9% | 47.9 | | Home Games | 18-6 | +9.2 | 14-10 | 14-10 | 98.2 | 50.4 | 45.2% | 52.0 | 91.1 | 46.0 | 42.8% | 49.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -4.5 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 99.8 | 52.8 | 46.8% | 51.0 | 101.4 | 51.2 | 49.6% | 43.8 | | Division Games | 4-4 | +1.2 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 95.2 | 49.2 | 46.6% | 52.1 | 90.0 | 45.4 | 42.4% | 46.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 95.1 | 48.6 | 35-77 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 50 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 99.7 | 50.7 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 19-25 | 75.9% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 98.2 | 50.4 | 36-79 | 45.2% | 6-16 | 35.0% | 21-27 | 76.1% | 52 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 94.2 | 48.0 | 36-79 | 44.9% | 7-21 | 33.5% | 16-21 | 75.2% | 48 | 10 | 20 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 100.2 | 51 | 37-81 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 19-25 | 75.9% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 91.1 | 46.0 | 34-80 | 42.8% | 6-22 | 28.2% | 16-22 | 73.7% | 50 | 10 | 18 | 22 | 7 | 16 | 7 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 95.4, CHARLOTTE 96.6 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2010 | SAN ANTONIO | 86-97 | L | 6 | L | 203 | U | 35-80 | 43.7% | 46 | 9 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 45 | 11 | | 1/5/2010 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 104-97 | W | 5 | W | 206 | U | 41-79 | 51.9% | 39 | 14 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 53 | 18 | | 1/6/2010 | @ CLEVELAND | 98-121 | L | 14.5 | L | 196 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 35 | 10 | 43-75 | 57.3% | 54 | 14 | | 1/8/2010 | ORLANDO | 104-97 | W | 7.5 | W | 203 | U | 34-80 | 42.5% | 62 | 15 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 48 | 11 | | 1/10/2010 | NEW ORLEANS | 110-115 | L | -1.5 | L | 197 | O | 44-76 | 57.9% | 48 | 19 | 42-80 | 52.5% | 37 | 10 | | 1/12/2010 | DETROIT | 90-99 | L | -5.5 | L | 199 | U | 34-77 | 44.2% | 47 | 11 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 50 | 10 | | 1/13/2010 | @ ATLANTA | 82-94 | L | 11.5 | L | 203 | U | 29-81 | 35.8% | 53 | 13 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 56 | 7 | | 1/15/2010 | @ CHICAGO | 119-121 | L | 6 | W | 198 | O | 46-102 | 45.1% | 64 | 6 | 44-97 | 45.4% | 61 | 9 | | 1/16/2010 | SACRAMENTO | 96-86 | W | 1.5 | W | 209 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 49 | 10 | 31-83 | 37.3% | 53 | 15 | | 1/18/2010 | PORTLAND | 97-92 | W | -2 | W | 194 | U | 35-68 | 51.5% | 38 | 13 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 44 | 14 | | 1/20/2010 | DALLAS | 93-94 | L | 4 | W | 196 | U | 36-81 | 44.4% | 50 | 14 | 39-85 | 45.9% | 47 | 11 | | 1/22/2010 | MIAMI | 88-112 | L | 2.5 | L | 192.5 | O | 32-81 | 39.5% | 41 | 10 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 50 | 11 | | 1/24/2010 | LA CLIPPERS | 78-92 | L | -3 | L | 194 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 55 | 18 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 56 | 10 | | 1/26/2010 | LA LAKERS | 103-115 | L | 8 | L | 199 | O | 43-84 | 51.2% | 45 | 10 | 44-75 | 58.7% | 35 | 9 | | 1/29/2010 | @ NEW JERSEY | 81-79 | W | -3 | L | 192.5 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 49 | 19 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 42 | 16 | | 1/30/2010 | NEW YORK | 106-96 | W | 2 | W | 204.5 | U | 44-98 | 44.9% | 64 | 14 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 48 | 9 | | 2/1/2010 | BOSTON | 88-99 | L | 5.5 | L | 190 | U | 28-72 | 38.9% | 41 | 13 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 16 | | 2/3/2010 | @ NEW YORK | 85-107 | L | 6 | L | 202.5 | U | 37-77 | 48.1% | 34 | 14 | 46-88 | 52.3% | 51 | 10 | | 2/5/2010 | @ ORLANDO | 92-91 | W | 13 | W | 194.5 | U | 34-79 | 43.0% | 58 | 19 | 32-83 | 38.6% | 45 | 11 | | 2/9/2010 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2010 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2010 | DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2010 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2010 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2010 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/2/2010 | @ MIAMI | 107-97 | W | 5 | W | 187 | O | 35-67 | 52.2% | 37 | 11 | 36-78 | 46.2% | 42 | 15 | | 1/3/2010 | @ CLEVELAND | 91-88 | W | 11.5 | W | 185.5 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 36 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 44 | 12 | | 1/5/2010 | CHICAGO | 113-108 | W | -7 | L | 186.5 | O | 39-76 | 51.3% | 41 | 13 | 43-84 | 51.2% | 50 | 18 | | 1/7/2010 | @ NEW YORK | 93-97 | L | 3 | L | 199 | U | 37-89 | 41.6% | 42 | 7 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 48 | 18 | | 1/9/2010 | MEMPHIS | 89-87 | W | -6 | L | 199.5 | U | 33-78 | 42.3% | 53 | 18 | 35-86 | 40.7% | 55 | 13 | | 1/12/2010 | HOUSTON | 102-94 | W | -2.5 | W | 190 | O | 39-77 | 50.6% | 44 | 11 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 54 | 14 | | 1/15/2010 | SAN ANTONIO | 92-76 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 35-76 | 46.1% | 49 | 10 | 31-80 | 38.7% | 50 | 14 | | 1/16/2010 | PHOENIX | 125-99 | W | -3 | W | 208.5 | O | 46-91 | 50.5% | 53 | 9 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 49 | 15 | | 1/18/2010 | SACRAMENTO | 105-103 | W | -7 | L | 197 | O | 39-83 | 47.0% | 48 | 10 | 41-84 | 48.8% | 57 | 20 | | 1/20/2010 | MIAMI | 104-65 | W | -4 | W | 191 | U | 35-72 | 48.6% | 62 | 20 | 22-76 | 28.9% | 49 | 14 | | 1/22/2010 | @ ATLANTA | 89-103 | L | 6.5 | L | 190.5 | O | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 17 | 42-82 | 51.2% | 39 | 12 | | 1/23/2010 | ORLANDO | 95-106 | L | -1 | L | 190.5 | O | 35-88 | 39.8% | 56 | 12 | 38-87 | 43.7% | 58 | 12 | | 1/25/2010 | @ DENVER | 93-104 | L | 5.5 | L | 195.5 | O | 34-72 | 47.2% | 49 | 15 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 44 | 11 | | 1/26/2010 | @ PHOENIX | 114-109 | W | 5.5 | W | 209.5 | O | 41-92 | 44.6% | 55 | 12 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 50 | 18 | | 1/29/2010 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 121-110 | W | -2 | W | 211 | O | 41-81 | 50.6% | 61 | 16 | 45-85 | 52.9% | 41 | 9 | | 1/30/2010 | @ SACRAMENTO | 103-96 | W | -1 | W | 199 | P | 39-81 | 48.1% | 54 | 14 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | | 2/1/2010 | @ PORTLAND | 79-98 | L | 2 | L | 190 | U | 26-64 | 40.6% | 37 | 21 | 40-75 | 53.3% | 41 | 18 | | 2/3/2010 | @ LA LAKERS | 97-99 | L | 10 | W | 195 | O | 37-82 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 44 | 7 | | 2/6/2010 | NEW ORLEANS | 99-104 | L | -9 | L | 190.5 | O | 37-77 | 48.1% | 47 | 11 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 44 | 10 | | 2/9/2010 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2010 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2010 | NEW JERSEY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2010 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2010 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2010 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2010 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CHARLOTTE is 12-9 against the spread versus WASHINGTON since 1996 | | WASHINGTON is 13-8 straight up against CHARLOTTE since 1996 | | 12 of 21 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHARLOTTE is 5-4 against the spread versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | CHARLOTTE is 5-4 straight up against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 9 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CHARLOTTE is 5-5 against the spread versus WASHINGTON since 1996 | | WASHINGTON is 6-4 straight up against CHARLOTTE since 1996 | | 7 of 10 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| CHARLOTTE is 2-2 against the spread versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | CHARLOTTE is 2-2 straight up against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/28/2009 | CHARLOTTE | 92 | 190 | SU ATS | 42 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 53 | 9 | 12 | | | WASHINGTON | 76 | -3.5 | Under | 32 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 44 | 7 | 14 | 03/25/2009 | CHARLOTTE | 93 | -6 | Under | 57 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 19-30 | 63.3% | 53 | 13 | 18 | | | WASHINGTON | 95 | 191 | SU ATS | 50 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 47 | 10 | 19 | 02/11/2009 | WASHINGTON | 89 | 187.5 | Over | 45 | 35-84 | 41.7% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 47 | 13 | 16 | | | CHARLOTTE | 101 | -8 | SU ATS | 56 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 11-27 | 40.7% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 47 | 10 | 16 | 01/10/2009 | CHARLOTTE | 92 | 181.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 34 | 8 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 89 | -3.5 | Under | 49 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 1-3 | 33.3% | 20-28 | 71.4% | 42 | 9 | 15 | 12/23/2008 | WASHINGTON | 72 | 189.5 | Under | 36 | 28-87 | 32.2% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 49 | 12 | 8 | | | CHARLOTTE | 80 | -6 | SU ATS | 36 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 17-28 | 60.7% | 64 | 12 | 18 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WASHINGTON games 50.1% of the time since 1996. (435-433) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in WASHINGTON games 44.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (80-101) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHARLOTTE games 47.5% of the time since 1996. (171-189) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CHARLOTTE games 49.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (82-84) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in WASHINGTON games 50.7% of the time since 1996. (483-469) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in WASHINGTON games 50.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (97-94) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHARLOTTE games 51.9% of the time since 1996. (206-191) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CHARLOTTE games 57.4% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (108-80) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 01/27/2010 - Javaris Crittenton out for season ( Suspension ) | | [G] 01/06/2010 - Gilbert Arenas out for season ( Suspension ) | | [F] 02/04/2010 - Caron Butler "?" Friday vs. Orlando ( Knee ) | | [F] 02/09/2010 - Antawn Jamison is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. Charlotte ( Not Suspended ) | |
| [C] 02/09/2010 - Tyson Chandler is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. Washington ( Foot ) | | [F] 02/03/2010 - Gerald Wallace "?" Saturday vs New Orleans ( Hamstring ) | | [C] 02/03/2010 - Alexis Ajinca expected to miss at least 6 weeks ( Hand ) | | [G] 02/08/2010 - Raymond Felton is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. Washington ( Ankle ) |
|
|