|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 23-25 | 105-105 | 561-547 | 23-25 | 107-102 | 574-534 | 16-34 | 71-143 | 584-547 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 7-8 | 36-39 | 89-92 | 6-10 | 33-43 | 92-90 | 7-9 | 25-51 | 83-100 | | as an underdog | 17-20 | 81-75 | 260-265 | 18-19 | 82-73 | 277-239 | 7-31 | 37-121 | 158-376 | | as a road underdog of 3.5 to 6 points | 1-2 | 8-7 | 55-49 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 55-50 | 1-2 | 6-9 | 44-62 | | in road games | 12-12 | 53-51 | 270-288 | 11-14 | 53-52 | 286-271 | 3-22 | 21-86 | 216-353 | | in a road game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 3-3 | 21-20 | 43-48 | 3-3 | 20-21 | 47-44 | 0-6 | 7-34 | 28-64 | | in February games | 2-2 | 16-13 | 82-80 | 3-1 | 17-14 | 92-72 | 0-4 | 9-22 | 84-87 | | second half of the season | 2-2 | 39-35 | 249-251 | 3-1 | 40-36 | 260-243 | 0-4 | 25-51 | 266-260 | | on Tuesday nights | 2-5 | 16-21 | 115-101 | 0-7 | 16-21 | 106-114 | 2-5 | 12-25 | 140-91 | | against Atlantic division opponents | 2-3 | 10-15 | 72-84 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 81-74 | 2-3 | 9-16 | 92-66 | | after a non-conference game | 10-9 | 42-35 | 170-202 | 9-9 | 40-35 | 190-181 | 5-14 | 31-48 | 178-207 | | in non-conference games | 6-14 | 33-46 | 175-199 | 10-9 | 42-35 | 191-185 | 6-14 | 24-56 | 209-177 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 11-13 | 54-58 | 201-205 | 10-15 | 56-58 | 200-206 | 9-16 | 39-76 | 205-220 | | after a loss by 10 points or more | 9-7 | 38-33 | 142-122 | 7-9 | 36-34 | 136-125 | 5-11 | 23-48 | 135-140 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 5-9 | 26-33 | 64-80 | 8-8 | 31-31 | 72-71 | 5-11 | 22-40 | 60-91 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 12-8 | 46-48 | 220-219 | 8-11 | 43-49 | 225-219 | 12-8 | 43-52 | 289-170 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 0-1 | 14-20 | 93-104 | 0-1 | 14-21 | 98-103 | 1-0 | 15-20 | 129-79 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 13-12 | 52-58 | 152-148 | 11-14 | 53-56 | 148-153 | 12-14 | 44-68 | 169-146 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 1-3 | 21-32 | 78-77 | 2-2 | 25-29 | 79-80 | 1-3 | 18-36 | 84-80 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 15-14 | 50-53 | 157-155 | 15-15 | 55-50 | 173-139 | 9-22 | 32-74 | 124-198 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 3-4 | 19-25 | 87-88 | 3-4 | 23-22 | 100-77 | 1-6 | 12-33 | 64-118 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 23-27 | 107-105 | 557-555 | 21-29 | 108-106 | 567-549 | 19-31 | 74-140 | 521-615 | | when the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 6-6 | 38-34 | 47-41 | 4-8 | 32-41 | 40-49 | 3-9 | 19-54 | 24-65 | | as a favorite | 8-9 | 20-32 | 219-245 | 6-11 | 21-31 | 217-246 | 9-8 | 26-26 | 306-169 | | as a home favorite of 3.5 to 6 points | 3-3 | 6-11 | 59-68 | 1-5 | 5-12 | 62-64 | 3-3 | 7-10 | 87-42 | | in home games | 13-14 | 50-59 | 279-280 | 12-15 | 56-53 | 279-282 | 12-15 | 47-62 | 326-244 | | in a home game where the total is greater than or equal to 210 | 2-4 | 11-22 | 15-25 | 2-4 | 16-17 | 20-20 | 1-5 | 9-24 | 12-28 | | in February games | 2-1 | 16-12 | 80-81 | 2-1 | 22-7 | 87-70 | 1-2 | 8-21 | 73-94 | | second half of the season | 2-1 | 38-36 | 247-247 | 2-1 | 45-31 | 253-240 | 1-2 | 21-55 | 229-286 | | on Tuesday nights | 5-1 | 20-8 | 94-91 | 1-5 | 14-14 | 90-90 | 4-2 | 12-16 | 92-96 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 2-1 | 12-14 | 73-84 | 0-3 | 11-15 | 85-75 | 2-1 | 12-14 | 79-85 | | against Pacific division opponents | 3-3 | 13-13 | 86-70 | 2-4 | 15-11 | 82-74 | 2-4 | 5-21 | 70-88 | | in non-conference games | 9-8 | 41-36 | 184-183 | 7-10 | 40-37 | 187-180 | 6-11 | 21-56 | 157-216 | | revenging a loss vs opponent | 14-17 | 70-68 | 301-283 | 12-19 | 67-72 | 307-281 | 10-21 | 45-94 | 266-334 | | after allowing 105 points or more | 12-10 | 57-55 | 142-140 | 10-12 | 53-60 | 141-143 | 9-13 | 39-74 | 124-165 | | after scoring 105 points or more | 9-7 | 37-35 | 99-107 | 7-9 | 39-34 | 106-105 | 7-9 | 24-49 | 86-128 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 14-13 | 50-59 | 224-262 | 9-18 | 51-59 | 237-253 | 14-13 | 46-64 | 253-251 | | when playing against a team with a losing record - 2nd half of the season | 2-3 | 18-26 | 92-126 | 2-3 | 25-20 | 114-107 | 2-3 | 15-30 | 104-122 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game | 9-10 | 45-46 | 133-138 | 9-10 | 48-44 | 142-133 | 7-12 | 32-60 | 130-150 | | versus poor defensive teams - allowing 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 2-3 | 21-24 | 61-71 | 1-4 | 24-22 | 69-66 | 2-3 | 15-31 | 59-78 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game | 9-11 | 42-42 | 127-126 | 12-8 | 47-38 | 130-127 | 5-15 | 22-63 | 90-170 | | versus good offensive teams - scoring 99+ points/game - 2nd half of the season | 1-3 | 17-20 | 57-70 | 3-1 | 22-16 | 68-63 | 0-4 | 6-32 | 38-95 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 16-34 | -15.8 | 23-25 | 23-25 | 101.6 | 52.3 | 45.6% | 52.0 | 105.8 | 54.4 | 47.3% | 50.7 | | Road Games | 3-22 | -17.6 | 12-12 | 11-14 | 97.5 | 50.2 | 45.1% | 49.8 | 105.6 | 54.9 | 48.9% | 49.7 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 104.8 | 57.6 | 46.9% | 50.6 | 111.8 | 59.0 | 50.2% | 50.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 101.6 | 52.3 | 38-84 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 19-25 | 73.5% | 52 | 12 | 20 | 23 | 7 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 100.5 | 51.1 | 38-82 | 45.9% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 19-24 | 75.9% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 97.5 | 50.2 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 18-24 | 73.1% | 50 | 11 | 20 | 24 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 105.8 | 54.4 | 39-83 | 47.3% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 21-28 | 77.0% | 51 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents averaging | 101.1 | 51.2 | 38-82 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 35.8% | 19-25 | 76.4% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 105.6 | 54.9 | 40-81 | 48.9% | 5-15 | 35.5% | 21-28 | 75.7% | 50 | 10 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 19-31 | -3.1 | 23-27 | 21-29 | 101.1 | 50.5 | 45.3% | 47.9 | 103.4 | 53.2 | 47.5% | 51.7 | | Home Games | 12-15 | -4.5 | 13-14 | 12-15 | 102.9 | 51.9 | 45.8% | 48.6 | 102.8 | 51.8 | 48.2% | 49.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 101.4 | 48.8 | 46.7% | 44.6 | 106.0 | 54.4 | 49.0% | 52.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 101.1 | 50.5 | 38-84 | 45.3% | 9-26 | 34.3% | 16-21 | 77.5% | 48 | 10 | 22 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 99.3 | 50.6 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 19-25 | 75.8% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 102.9 | 51.9 | 39-85 | 45.8% | 9-26 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 78.8% | 49 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 103.4 | 53.2 | 40-83 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 33.8% | 18-23 | 77.1% | 52 | 11 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 98.8 | 50.2 | 37-81 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 19-25 | 75.7% | 50 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 102.8 | 51.8 | 39-82 | 48.2% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 17-23 | 77.2% | 49 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SACRAMENTO 96.2, NEW YORK 95.6 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/1/2010 | @ LA LAKERS | 108-109 | L | 12 | W | 211 | O | 43-79 | 54.4% | 43 | 13 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 50 | 12 | | 1/2/2010 | DALLAS | 91-99 | L | 4 | L | 206 | U | 37-92 | 40.2% | 52 | 16 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 47 | 17 | | 1/5/2010 | PHOENIX | 109-113 | L | 2.5 | L | 226 | U | 42-94 | 44.7% | 58 | 14 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 18 | | 1/8/2010 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 101-108 | L | 4.5 | L | 229.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 51 | 15 | 38-79 | 48.1% | 45 | 12 | | 1/9/2010 | DENVER | 102-100 | W | -2 | T | 212.5 | U | 38-78 | 48.7% | 47 | 16 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 50 | 14 | | 1/12/2010 | ORLANDO | 88-109 | L | 4 | L | 207 | U | 30-86 | 34.9% | 49 | 12 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 55 | 12 | | 1/15/2010 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 86-98 | L | 3 | L | 209 | U | 26-70 | 37.1% | 52 | 19 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 48 | 11 | | 1/16/2010 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-96 | L | -1.5 | L | 209 | U | 31-83 | 37.3% | 53 | 15 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 49 | 10 | | 1/18/2010 | @ CHARLOTTE | 103-105 | L | 7 | W | 197 | O | 41-84 | 48.8% | 57 | 20 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 48 | 10 | | 1/20/2010 | @ ATLANTA | 97-108 | L | 9 | L | 203.5 | O | 41-87 | 47.1% | 43 | 12 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 49 | 15 | | 1/22/2010 | @ ORLANDO | 84-100 | L | 9.5 | L | 208 | U | 31-93 | 33.3% | 58 | 14 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 59 | 23 | | 1/23/2010 | @ MIAMI | 84-115 | L | 7 | L | 201.5 | U | 32-73 | 43.8% | 47 | 13 | 44-78 | 56.4% | 53 | 10 | | 1/26/2010 | GOLDEN STATE | 99-96 | W | -5.5 | L | 219 | U | 35-92 | 38.0% | 80 | 19 | 30-94 | 31.9% | 59 | 12 | | 1/29/2010 | @ UTAH | 94-101 | L | 8.5 | W | 203 | U | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 16 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 52 | 14 | | 1/30/2010 | CHARLOTTE | 96-103 | L | 1 | L | 199 | P | 39-86 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | 39-81 | 48.1% | 54 | 14 | | 2/1/2010 | @ DENVER | 109-112 | L | 11 | W | 211 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 54 | 19 | 41-89 | 46.1% | 50 | 9 | | 2/3/2010 | SAN ANTONIO | 113-115 | L | 4.5 | W | 200 | O | 45-86 | 52.3% | 41 | 12 | 44-84 | 52.4% | 50 | 14 | | 2/5/2010 | PHOENIX | 102-114 | L | 2.5 | L | 223 | U | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 51 | 10 | | 2/7/2010 | @ TORONTO | 104-115 | L | 8 | L | 217.5 | O | 37-85 | 43.5% | 54 | 12 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 47 | 15 | | 2/9/2010 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2010 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2010 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2010 | @ GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2010 | @ LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2010 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2010 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/1/2010 | @ ATLANTA | 112-108 | W | 11 | W | 205.5 | O | 45-88 | 51.1% | 53 | 13 | 46-100 | 46.0% | 55 | 10 | | 1/3/2010 | INDIANA | 132-89 | W | -9 | W | 208.5 | O | 50-96 | 52.1% | 64 | 9 | 37-91 | 40.7% | 39 | 13 | | 1/7/2010 | CHARLOTTE | 97-93 | W | -3 | W | 199 | U | 39-73 | 53.4% | 48 | 18 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 42 | 7 | | 1/9/2010 | @ HOUSTON | 96-105 | L | 6.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 39-75 | 52.0% | 41 | 15 | 42-85 | 49.4% | 45 | 10 | | 1/11/2010 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 88-106 | L | 5 | L | 201 | U | 34-89 | 38.2% | 55 | 19 | 41-88 | 46.6% | 56 | 14 | | 1/13/2010 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 93-92 | W | 2.5 | W | 204 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 43 | 9 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 61 | 13 | | 1/15/2010 | TORONTO | 104-112 | L | -2 | L | 210.5 | O | 38-86 | 44.2% | 47 | 13 | 39-73 | 53.4% | 47 | 12 | | 1/16/2010 | @ DETROIT | 90-94 | L | 1 | L | 194.5 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 46 | 18 | 32-82 | 39.0% | 65 | 16 | | 1/18/2010 | DETROIT | 99-91 | W | -7.5 | W | 191.5 | U | 36-73 | 49.3% | 45 | 18 | 39-96 | 40.6% | 60 | 12 | | 1/22/2010 | LA LAKERS | 105-115 | L | 5.5 | L | 204.5 | O | 41-91 | 45.1% | 53 | 6 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 9 | | 1/24/2010 | DALLAS | 78-128 | L | 1 | L | 197.5 | O | 29-86 | 33.7% | 49 | 16 | 50-86 | 58.1% | 50 | 10 | | 1/26/2010 | MINNESOTA | 132-105 | W | -6.5 | W | 208.5 | O | 47-93 | 50.5% | 52 | 13 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 50 | 21 | | 1/28/2010 | TORONTO | 104-106 | L | -3.5 | L | 218 | U | 38-87 | 43.7% | 44 | 13 | 40-81 | 49.4% | 56 | 21 | | 1/30/2010 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-106 | L | -2 | L | 204.5 | U | 38-85 | 44.7% | 48 | 9 | 44-98 | 44.9% | 64 | 14 | | 1/31/2010 | @ MINNESOTA | 91-112 | L | 2 | L | 210 | U | 35-88 | 39.8% | 39 | 13 | 42-84 | 50.0% | 65 | 18 | | 2/3/2010 | WASHINGTON | 107-85 | W | -6 | W | 202.5 | U | 46-88 | 52.3% | 51 | 10 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 34 | 14 | | 2/5/2010 | MILWAUKEE | 107-114 | L | -2 | L | 201 | O | 39-87 | 44.8% | 50 | 11 | 44-92 | 47.8% | 57 | 11 | | 2/6/2010 | @ CLEVELAND | 106-113 | L | 12 | W | 201.5 | O | 41-78 | 52.6% | 35 | 13 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 41 | 13 | | 2/9/2010 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2010 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2010 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2010 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2010 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2010 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 15-11 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | SACRAMENTO is 15-11 straight up against NEW YORK since 1996 | | 16 of 26 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| SACRAMENTO is 4-1 against the spread versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | SACRAMENTO is 4-1 straight up against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW YORK is 7-5 against the spread versus SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | NEW YORK is 8-4 straight up against SACRAMENTO since 1996 | | 8 of 12 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996 |
| |
| SACRAMENTO is 2-0 against the spread versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | SACRAMENTO is 2-0 straight up against NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2009 | NEW YORK | 97 | 215.5 | Under | 51 | 35-91 | 38.5% | 10-39 | 25.6% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 52 | 16 | 17 | | | SACRAMENTO | 111 | -4 | SU ATS | 61 | 43-89 | 48.3% | 12-27 | 44.4% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 56 | 14 | 18 | 03/20/2009 | SACRAMENTO | 121 | 224.5 | SU ATS | 62 | 47-85 | 55.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 22-25 | 88.0% | 61 | 11 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 94 | -9 | Under | 43 | 35-88 | 39.8% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 39 | 12 | 12 | 12/13/2008 | NEW YORK | 114 | 218.5 | SU ATS | 69 | 43-87 | 49.4% | 13-27 | 48.1% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 58 | 9 | 14 | | | SACRAMENTO | 90 | -1.5 | Under | 45 | 36-98 | 36.7% | 3-23 | 13.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 58 | 14 | 12 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 48.4% of the time since 1996. (436-464) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in SACRAMENTO games 47.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (80-90) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 51.5% of the time since 1996. (461-435) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in NEW YORK games 52.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (91-83) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 50.6% of the time since 1996. (488-476) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in SACRAMENTO games 45.1% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (87-106) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 50.8% of the time since 1996. (496-480) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in NEW YORK games 45.2% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (90-109) | |
|
|
|
|
| [G] 10/09/2009 - Francisco Garcia out indefinitely ( Forearm ) | | [F] 02/04/2010 - Jason Thompson expected to miss Friday vs. Phoenix ( Personal ) | | [C] 02/05/2010 - Omri Casspi probable Friday vs. Phoenix ( Flu ) | |
| [C] 01/19/2010 - Eddy Curry out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [G] 02/09/2010 - Nate Robinson is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. Sacramento ( Groin ) | | [F] 02/08/2010 - Larry Hughes "?" Tuesday vs. Sacramento ( Toe ) |
|
|