|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH | FLEURY | 4.1 | 0, -219 |  | | WINNIPEG | PAVALEC | 2.5 | 0, +219 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 2-1 | 0 | 106-73 | +9.2 | 665-651 | -53.5 | 2-1 | 82-82 | 630-604 | | in a road game where where the total is 5.5 | 1-0 | +1 | 33-26 | +2.6 | 130-135 | -5.7 | 1-0 | 29-30 | 124-146 | | in January games | 2-1 | 0 | 16-10 | +1.7 | 99-103 | -14.5 | 2-1 | 10-13 | 103-83 | | second half of the season | 2-1 | 0 | 61-42 | +4.9 | 392-381 | -21.8 | 2-1 | 52-42 | 386-333 | | on Friday nights | 0-0 | 0 | 15-9 | +2.8 | 79-67 | +13 | 0-0 | 9-12 | 67-72 | | after allowing 4 goals or more | 0-0 | 0 | 23-19 | +0.2 | 210-238 | -42.2 | 0-0 | 22-16 | 224-207 | | after a loss by 2 goals or more in their previous game | 0-0 | 0 | 19-19 | -4.9 | 180-190 | -6.1 | 0-0 | 20-15 | 171-171 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 1-0 | +1 | 50-21 | +18.4 | 308-253 | -21.9 | 1-0 | 35-33 | 274-272 | | when playing against a team with a losing record in the first half of the season | 1-0 | +1 | 24-9 | +10.4 | 138-117 | -13.1 | 1-0 | 15-17 | 123-130 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 1-2 | -0.8 | 37-47 | -9 | 37-47 | -9 | 1-2 | 40-41 | 40-41 | | in a home game where where the total is 5.5 | 0-1 | -1.2 | 19-15 | +2.1 | 19-15 | +2.1 | 0-1 | 16-18 | 16-18 | | in January games | 1-2 | -0.8 | 5-11 | -5.1 | 5-11 | -5.1 | 1-2 | 5-11 | 5-11 | | second half of the season | 1-2 | -0.8 | 19-28 | -9.2 | 19-28 | -9.2 | 1-2 | 24-21 | 24-21 | | on Friday nights | 0-0 | 0 | 6-3 | +3.8 | 6-3 | +3.8 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 5-4 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 0-0 | 0 | 8-5 | +2.9 | 8-5 | +2.9 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 6-7 | | after a division game | 0-0 | 0 | 8-15 | -6.2 | 8-15 | -6.2 | 0-0 | 10-12 | 10-12 | | after a win by 2 goals or more | 0-0 | 0 | 7-11 | -4.3 | 7-11 | -4.3 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 8-9 | | after scoring 4 goals or more in their previous game | 0-0 | 0 | 12-16 | -4.4 | 12-16 | -4.4 | 0-0 | 13-14 | 13-14 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 0-1 | -1 | 14-20 | -2.9 | 14-20 | -2.9 | 0-1 | 15-17 | 15-17 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the first half of the season | 0-1 | -1 | 7-9 | -0.8 | 7-9 | -0.8 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 8-8 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 2-1-0 | 0 | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 3.7 | 32.0 | 3.0 | 28.3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 2-0-0 | +2 | 2-0 | +2 | 1-1 | 4.5 | 33.0 | 2.0 | 30.5 | | Last 5 Games | 2-1-0 | 0 | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 3.7 | 32.0 | 3.0 | 28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 3 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 96 | 11.5% | 13 | 5 | 38.5% | 16 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 66 | 13.6% | 8 | 4 | 50.0% | 13 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 3 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 96 | 11.5% | 13 | 5 | 38.5% | 16 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 10.6% | 17 | 2 | 11.8% | 15 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 6.6% | 9 | 1 | 11.1% | 7 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 10.6% | 17 | 2 | 11.8% | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (All Games) | 2 | 2 | 51 | 45 | 88.2% | 0 | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1-0 | -1 | 1-1 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (Road Games) | 1 | 1 | 27 | 26 | 96.3% | 0 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0-0 | +1 | 0-1 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (Last 4 Games) | 2 | 2 | 51 | 45 | 88.2% | 0 | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1-0 | -1 | 1-1 | | BRAD THIESSEN (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | BRAD THIESSEN (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | TOMAS VOKOUN (All Games) | 1 | 1 | 34 | 31 | 91.2% | 0 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0-0 | +1 | 1-0 | | TOMAS VOKOUN (Road Games) | 1 | 1 | 34 | 31 | 91.2% | 0 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0-0 | +1 | 1-0 | | TOMAS VOKOUN (Last 4 Games) | 1 | 1 | 34 | 31 | 91.2% | 0 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0-0 | +1 | 1-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-2-0 | -0.8 | 1-2 | -0.8 | 1-2 | 2.0 | 31.3 | 2.7 | 32.7 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 0-1-0 | -1.2 | 0-1 | -1.2 | 0-1 | 1.0 | 28.0 | 4.0 | 37.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-2-0 | -0.8 | 1-2 | -0.8 | 1-2 | 2.0 | 31.3 | 2.7 | 32.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 6.4% | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 12 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 3.6% | 6 | 1 | 16.7% | 2 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 6.4% | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 12 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 98 | 8.2% | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 11 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 10.8% | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | 6 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 98 | 8.2% | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
| AL MONTOYA (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | AL MONTOYA (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | ONDREJ PAVALEC (All Games) | 3 | 3 | 98 | 91 | 92.9% | 0 | 1-2 | -0.8 | 1-2-0 | -1 | 1-2 | | ONDREJ PAVALEC (Home Games) | 1 | 1 | 37 | 33 | 89.2% | 0 | 0-1 | -1.2 | 0-1-0 | -1 | 0-1 | | ONDREJ PAVALEC (Last 4 Games) | 3 | 3 | 98 | 91 | 92.9% | 0 | 1-2 | -0.8 | 1-2-0 | -1 | 1-2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 2.82, WINNIPEG 3.22 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 1/19/2013 | at PHILADELPHIA | 3-1 | W | 0, -125 | W | 6 ov | U | | 1/20/2013 | at NY RANGERS | 6-3 | W | 0, -105 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/23/2013 | TORONTO | 2-5 | L | 0, -200 | L | 6 un | O | | 1/25/2013 | at WINNIPEG | | | 1/27/2013 | at OTTAWA | | | 1/29/2013 | NY ISLANDERS | | | 1/31/2013 | at NY RANGERS | | | 2/2/2013 | NEW JERSEY | | | 2/3/2013 | at WASHINGTON | | | 2/5/2013 | at NY ISLANDERS | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/19/2013 | OTTAWA | 1-4 | L | 0, -125 | L | 5.5 ov | U | | 1/21/2013 | at BOSTON | 1-2 | L | 0, +160 | L | 5.5 ov | U | | 1/22/2013 | at WASHINGTON | 4-2 | W | 0, +145 | W | 5.5 ev | O | | 1/25/2013 | PITTSBURGH | | | 1/27/2013 | NY ISLANDERS | | | 1/29/2013 | at MONTREAL | | | 1/31/2013 | at FLORIDA | | | 2/1/2013 | at TAMPA BAY | | | 2/5/2013 | FLORIDA | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH is 34-13 (+19.9 Units) against the spread versus WINNIPEG since 1996 | | PITTSBURGH is 36-12-0 straight up against WINNIPEG since 1996 | | 22 of 42 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+1.0 Units) |
| |
| PITTSBURGH is 7-1 (+5.6 Units) against the spread versus WINNIPEG over the last 3 seasons | | PITTSBURGH is 7-1-0 straight up against WINNIPEG over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=+0.8 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH is 16-8 (+7.4 Units) against the spread versus WINNIPEG since 1996 | | PITTSBURGH is 16-8-0 straight up against WINNIPEG since 1996 | | 12 of 21 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+2.9 Units) |
| |
| PITTSBURGH is 3-1 (+1.6 Units) against the spread versus WINNIPEG over the last 3 seasons | | PITTSBURGH is 3-1-0 straight up against WINNIPEG over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+0.9 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3/20/2012 | WINNIPEG | 4 | 0, +200 | | Over | 30 | 8 | 2-1 | PAVALEC | 24 | 19 | | | PITTSBURGH | 8 | 0, -240 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 35 | 15 | 3-1 | THIESSEN | 30 | 26 | | 2/11/2012 | WINNIPEG | 5 | 0, +175 | | Over | 25 | 9 | 1-0 | PAVALEC | 39 | 31 | | | PITTSBURGH | 8 | 0, -210 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 39 | 15 | 3-2 | FLEURY | 25 | 20 | | 12/23/2011 | PITTSBURGH | 4 | 0, -150 | | SU ATS | 39 | 6 | 4-1 | FLEURY | 19 | 18 | | | WINNIPEG | 1 | 0, +130 | 5.5 ov | Under | 19 | 2 | 3-0 | PAVALEC | 39 | 35 | | 10/17/2011 | PITTSBURGH | 1 | 0, -145 | | Under | 29 | 2 | 3-0 | FLEURY | 34 | 32 | | | WINNIPEG | 2 | 0, +125 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 34 | 3 | 4-0 | PAVALEC | 29 | 28 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|