|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| COLUMBUS | BOBROVSKY | 2.7 | 0, +217 | | | CHICAGO | CRAWFORD | 4.3 | 0, -217 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 5-12 | -5.4 | 67-113 | -31 | 386-531 | -84.7 | 7-9 | 83-86 | 410-448 | | in a road game where where the total is 5.5 | 2-4 | -1 | 22-45 | -13.4 | 82-153 | -38.7 | 1-5 | 33-34 | 110-125 | | in February games | 3-6 | -1.8 | 16-18 | +3.5 | 53-73 | -7.9 | 5-4 | 16-15 | 58-56 | | second half of the season | 5-12 | -5.4 | 38-67 | -15.6 | 213-281 | -19 | 7-9 | 51-46 | 233-230 | | on Sunday games | 0-1 | -1.2 | 3-16 | -12.3 | 34-56 | -15.8 | 0-1 | 7-9 | 45-39 | | vs. division opponents | 3-3 | +1.2 | 16-38 | -14.7 | 106-179 | -52 | 2-3 | 28-20 | 137-122 | | revenging a home loss versus opponent | 2-4 | -2 | 19-32 | -5.8 | 53-93 | -23.4 | 1-5 | 20-30 | 58-83 | | revenging a loss versus opponent | 3-6 | -2.5 | 44-66 | -10 | 136-188 | -24.2 | 3-6 | 51-57 | 143-169 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-3 | -0.2 | 27-62 | -22.9 | 179-277 | -45.2 | 2-2 | 43-43 | 208-218 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the first half of the season | 2-3 | -0.2 | 13-30 | -13.2 | 83-133 | -36.8 | 2-2 | 20-22 | 100-102 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 14-3 | +10.1 | 108-86 | -8.5 | 615-662 | -93.4 | 5-11 | 90-100 | 576-630 | | in a home game where where the total is 5.5 | 5-1 | +3.4 | 51-30 | -1.5 | 177-145 | -20.8 | 1-5 | 37-44 | 145-183 | | in February games | 8-2 | +5.4 | 21-16 | +1.2 | 78-91 | -14.6 | 3-6 | 16-20 | 78-79 | | second half of the season | 14-3 | +10.1 | 64-53 | -5.2 | 339-378 | -62.7 | 5-11 | 52-61 | 336-341 | | on Sunday games | 4-0 | +4 | 21-13 | +2 | 134-118 | -4.4 | 1-2 | 14-17 | 102-128 | | vs. division opponents | 4-0 | +4 | 35-17 | +12.9 | 190-190 | -11 | 0-4 | 25-27 | 187-172 | | after playing 3 consecutive home games | 2-0 | +2 | 12-9 | +1.1 | 69-80 | -14.7 | 1-1 | 9-12 | 60-80 | | after a 3 game unbeaten streak | 5-2 | +2.1 | 18-15 | -1.3 | 77-82 | -22.2 | 0-7 | 14-19 | 72-81 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 6-1 | +5 | 41-31 | -5.5 | 252-278 | -99.4 | 2-4 | 38-32 | 239-266 | | when playing against a team with a losing record in the first half of the season | 6-1 | +5 | 25-19 | -3.9 | 131-145 | -51.8 | 2-4 | 23-20 | 125-141 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-12-0 | -5.4 | 5-12 | -5.4 | 7-9 | 2.3 | 26.7 | 3.1 | 29.3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 2-6-0 | -3 | 2-6 | -3 | 2-6 | 1.9 | 23.7 | 3.2 | 30.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3-0 | +0.1 | 2-3 | +0.1 | 2-3 | 3.0 | 24.0 | 2.8 | 28.6 | | vs. Division | 3-3-0 | +1.2 | 3-3 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 2.7 | 27.3 | 2.8 | 31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 17 | 39 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 454 | 8.6% | 72 | 10 | 13.9% | 69 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 8 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 190 | 7.9% | 28 | 3 | 10.7% | 25 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 12.5% | 17 | 3 | 17.6% | 27 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 6 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 164 | 9.8% | 24 | 6 | 25.0% | 27 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 53 | 20 | 12 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 498 | 10.6% | 69 | 12 | 17.4% | 94 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 26 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 246 | 10.6% | 30 | 6 | 20.0% | 46 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 143 | 9.8% | 22 | 5 | 22.7% | 23 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 17 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 189 | 9.0% | 26 | 3 | 11.5% | 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
| SERGIE BOBROVSKY (All Games) | 10 | 10 | 264 | 238 | 90.2% | 1 | 3-7 | -3.2 | 3-7-0 | -2 | 2-7 | | SERGIE BOBROVSKY (Road Games) | 5 | 5 | 143 | 130 | 90.9% | 1 | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3-0 | 0 | 0-5 | | SERGIE BOBROVSKY (vs. Division) | 4 | 4 | 117 | 107 | 91.5% | 0 | 2-2 | +1 | 2-2-0 | +2 | 1-2 | | SERGIE BOBROVSKY (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 94 | 85 | 90.4% | 0 | 1-3 | -1.6 | 1-3-0 | -2 | 0-4 | | STEVE MASON (All Games) | 8 | 7 | 231 | 208 | 90.0% | 0 | 2-5 | -2.2 | 2-5-0 | -2 | 5-2 | | STEVE MASON (Road Games) | 3 | 3 | 102 | 90 | 88.2% | 0 | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3-0 | -3 | 2-1 | | STEVE MASON (vs. Division) | 3 | 2 | 71 | 66 | 93.0% | 0 | 1-1 | +0.1 | 1-1-0 | 0 | 1-1 | | STEVE MASON (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 126 | 114 | 90.5% | 0 | 2-2 | +0.8 | 2-2-0 | +1 | 4-0 | | CURTIS MCELHINNEY (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | CURTIS MCELHINNEY (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | CURTIS MCELHINNEY (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | ALLEN YORK (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | ALLEN YORK (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | ALLEN YORK (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 14-3-0 | +10.1 | 14-3 | +10.1 | 5-11 | 3.4 | 30.8 | 2.1 | 28.0 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 6-1-0 | +4.4 | 6-1 | +4.4 | 1-5 | 2.9 | 33.6 | 1.9 | 29.9 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1-0 | +2.4 | 4-1 | +2.4 | 1-3 | 3.0 | 36.2 | 2.0 | 29.0 | | vs. Division | 4-0-0 | +4 | 4-0 | +4 | 0-4 | 2.7 | 26.2 | 1.2 | 26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 17 | 57 | 19 | 21 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 523 | 10.9% | 73 | 13 | 17.8% | 93 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 7 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 235 | 8.5% | 29 | 6 | 20.7% | 35 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 181 | 8.3% | 23 | 4 | 17.4% | 25 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 4 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 105 | 10.5% | 12 | 2 | 16.7% | 19 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 35 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 476 | 7.4% | 62 | 7 | 11.3% | 58 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 13 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 209 | 6.2% | 28 | 5 | 17.9% | 23 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 10 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 145 | 6.9% | 20 | 4 | 20.0% | 17 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 107 | 4.7% | 14 | 1 | 7.1% | 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CORY CRAWFORD (All Games) | 10 | 10 | 262 | 245 | 93.5% | 0 | 7-3 | +3.1 | 7-3-0 | +3 | 2-8 | | CORY CRAWFORD (Home Games) | 3 | 3 | 95 | 90 | 94.7% | 0 | 2-1 | +0.4 | 2-1-0 | 0 | 0-3 | | CORY CRAWFORD (vs. Division) | 4 | 4 | 107 | 102 | 95.3% | 0 | 4-0 | +4 | 4-0-0 | +4 | 0-4 | | CORY CRAWFORD (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 103 | 97 | 94.2% | 0 | 2-2 | -0.6 | 2-2-0 | -1 | 1-3 | | RAY EMERY (All Games) | 7 | 7 | 214 | 199 | 93.0% | 0 | 7-0 | +7 | 7-0-0 | +7 | 3-3 | | RAY EMERY (Home Games) | 4 | 4 | 114 | 107 | 93.9% | 0 | 4-0 | +4 | 4-0-0 | +4 | 1-2 | | RAY EMERY (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | RAY EMERY (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 114 | 107 | 93.9% | 0 | 4-0 | +4 | 4-0-0 | +4 | 1-2 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLUMBUS 3.16, CHICAGO 3.26 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 1/28/2013 | DALLAS | 2-1 | W | 0, +100 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/29/2013 | at MINNESOTA | 2-3 | L | 0, +170 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/31/2013 | ST LOUIS | 1-4 | L | 0, +170 | L | 5 ov | P | | 2/2/2013 | DETROIT | 4-2 | W | 0, +115 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 2/5/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 2-4 | L | 0, +140 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/7/2013 | CALGARY | 3-4 | L | 0, +100 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/10/2013 | EDMONTON | 1-3 | L | 0, -115 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/11/2013 | SAN JOSE | 6-2 | W | 0, +165 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 2/15/2013 | at LOS ANGELES | 1-2 | L | 0, +155 | L | 5 ov | U | | 2/16/2013 | at PHOENIX | 3-5 | L | 0, +190 | L | 5 ov | O | | 2/18/2013 | at ANAHEIM | 2-3 | L | 0, +170 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/21/2013 | at DETROIT | 3-2 | W | 0, +150 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 2/23/2013 | at ST LOUIS | | | 2/24/2013 | at CHICAGO | | | 2/26/2013 | DALLAS | | | 3/1/2013 | at CHICAGO | | | 3/3/2013 | COLORADO | | | 3/5/2013 | EDMONTON | | | 3/7/2013 | VANCOUVER | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/30/2013 | at MINNESOTA | 2-3 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/1/2013 | at VANCOUVER | 1-2 | L | 0, +115 | L | 5 ov | U | | 2/2/2013 | at CALGARY | 3-2 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5.5 ev | U | | 2/5/2013 | at SAN JOSE | 5-3 | W | 0, +100 | W | 5 ov | O | | 2/7/2013 | at PHOENIX | 6-2 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 2/10/2013 | at NASHVILLE | 3-0 | W | 0, -130 | W | 5 ov | U | | 2/12/2013 | ANAHEIM | 2-3 | L | 0, -155 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/15/2013 | SAN JOSE | 4-1 | W | 0, -140 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 2/17/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 3-2 | W | 0, -160 | W | 5 ov | P | | 2/19/2013 | VANCOUVER | 4-3 | W | 0, -120 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 2/22/2013 | SAN JOSE | 2-1 | W | 0, -140 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 2/24/2013 | COLUMBUS | | | 2/25/2013 | EDMONTON | | | 2/28/2013 | at ST LOUIS | | | 3/1/2013 | COLUMBUS | | | 3/3/2013 | at DETROIT | | | 3/5/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | 3/6/2013 | COLORADO | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| CHICAGO is 40-28-2 straight up against COLUMBUS since 1996 | | 43 of 69 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=+14.3 Units) |
| |
| CHICAGO is 11-2 (+7.1 Units) against the spread versus COLUMBUS over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 11-2-0 straight up against COLUMBUS over the last 3 seasons | | 9 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=+4.5 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| COLUMBUS is 16-18 (+3.3 Units) against the spread versus CHICAGO since 1996 | | CHICAGO is 20-13-1 straight up against COLUMBUS since 1996 | | 17 of 33 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+0.5 Units) |
| |
| CHICAGO is 4-2 (+0.0 Units) against the spread versus COLUMBUS over the last 3 seasons | | CHICAGO is 4-2-0 straight up against COLUMBUS over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=-0.4 Units, Under=-0.2 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/26/2013 | CHICAGO | 3 | 0, -165 | | SU ATS | 24 | 5 | 4-0 | CRAWFORD | 26 | 24 | | | COLUMBUS | 2 | 0, +145 | 5.5 ov | Under | 26 | 4 | 5-0 | MASON | 24 | 21 | | 3/20/2012 | CHICAGO | 5 | 0, -190 | | SU ATS | 27 | 10 | 2-2 | CRAWFORD | 25 | 24 | | | COLUMBUS | 1 | 0, +165 | 5.5 un | Over | 25 | 2 | 2-0 | MASON | 27 | 22 | | 2/18/2012 | CHICAGO | 6 | 0, -165 | | SU ATS | 28 | 11 | 2-0 | CRAWFORD | 34 | 33 | | | COLUMBUS | 1 | 0, +145 | 5.5 ov | Over | 34 | 0 | 1-0 | MASON | 20 | 16 | | 1/10/2012 | COLUMBUS | 2 | 0, +200 | | Over | 34 | 4 | 5-0 | SANFORD | 24 | 20 | | | CHICAGO | 5 | 0, -240 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 25 | 8 | 4-0 | CRAWFORD | 34 | 32 | | 12/26/2011 | COLUMBUS | 1 | 0, +225 | | Under | 38 | 2 | 2-0 | MASON | 22 | 18 | | | CHICAGO | 4 | 0, -265 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 22 | 7 | 3-1 | CRAWFORD | 38 | 37 | | 11/10/2011 | CHICAGO | 6 | 0, -160 | | SU ATS | 36 | 11 | 3-2 | CRAWFORD | 30 | 27 | | | COLUMBUS | 3 | 0, +140 | 5.5 ov | Over | 30 | 6 | 5-2 | MASON | 36 | 30 | | 10/29/2011 | COLUMBUS | 2 | 0, +180 | | Over | 29 | 4 | 5-0 | YORK | 37 | 33 | | | CHICAGO | 5 | 0, -215 | 5.5 ev | SU ATS | 38 | 7 | 5-0 | EMERY | 29 | 27 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| [D] 01/15/2013 - Ryan Murray out for season ( Shoulder ) | | [C] 02/21/2013 - Artem Anisimov expected to miss Saturday vs. St. Louis ( Upper Body ) | | [C] 02/21/2013 - Brandon Dubinsky out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| [D] 01/15/2013 - Steve Montador out indefinitely ( Concussion ) | | [F] 01/15/2013 - Rostislav Olesz out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [C] 02/23/2013 - David Bolland "?" Sunday vs. Columbus ( Upper Body ) |
|
|