|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| BOSTON | RASK | 2.6 | 0, +103 | | | BUFFALO | MILLER | 2.7 | 0, -103 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 24-33 | -18.4 | 128-111 | -5 | 515-539 | -66.1 | 21-30 | 102-118 | 490-518 | | in a road game where where the total is 5 or less | 5-7 | -2 | 10-19 | -7.7 | 93-102 | -9.7 | 6-4 | 11-8 | 87-80 | | in February games | 1-3 | -2.7 | 14-15 | -5.2 | 60-68 | -14 | 0-2 | 14-13 | 72-51 | | second half of the season | 4-14 | -12.6 | 61-63 | -21.1 | 278-307 | -59.2 | 5-9 | 51-59 | 275-275 | | on Tuesday nights | 2-2 | 0 | 16-16 | -2.7 | 79-75 | +2.3 | 0-3 | 10-21 | 69-77 | | vs. division opponents | 9-7 | -0.2 | 46-37 | +7.9 | 159-179 | -12.2 | 7-7 | 41-37 | 159-164 | | after a division game | 8-7 | -1.4 | 50-31 | +16.2 | 169-159 | +3.1 | 7-6 | 35-38 | 161-156 | | after 3 or more consecutive unders | 4-6 | -3.5 | 15-21 | -11 | 72-67 | +1.3 | 2-4 | 14-14 | 64-67 | | revenging a loss versus opponent | 11-16 | -8.8 | 53-53 | -5.4 | 76-110 | -35.4 | 8-16 | 43-53 | 80-93 | | after shutting out their opponent in their previous game | 2-3 | -2 | 9-9 | -0.9 | 40-30 | +9.3 | 1-4 | 8-9 | 28-40 | | after a win by 2 goals or more | 6-7 | -3.5 | 54-25 | +24.2 | 155-119 | +24.8 | 5-8 | 34-42 | 120-150 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 11-13 | -2.4 | 52-52 | -2.2 | 237-260 | +0.2 | 9-13 | 35-55 | 210-257 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season | 1-7 | -5.9 | 23-31 | -11.5 | 124-155 | -22 | 2-5 | 19-26 | 125-134 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 32-25 | -0.2 | 112-109 | -21.6 | 596-507 | -1.7 | 25-30 | 107-102 | 470-562 | | in a home game where where the total is 5 or less | 2-3 | -2.6 | 2-5 | -4.7 | 135-103 | -1.9 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 96-112 | | in February games | 0-4 | -5.6 | 13-19 | -11.8 | 67-61 | -9.6 | 3-1 | 15-16 | 59-60 | | second half of the season | 8-10 | -4.5 | 52-56 | -12.6 | 344-286 | +7.9 | 10-8 | 57-47 | 269-310 | | on Tuesday nights | 2-1 | +1 | 11-8 | +2.3 | 70-60 | +4.5 | 3-0 | 12-6 | 58-70 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 6-2 | +3 | 14-14 | -3.1 | 113-87 | +14.7 | 6-1 | 17-9 | 82-105 | | vs. division opponents | 9-7 | -0.7 | 38-34 | -1.8 | 203-139 | +45.3 | 6-9 | 29-38 | 137-179 | | after a non-conference game | 9-4 | +5.5 | 20-21 | -4.2 | 119-118 | -17 | 6-7 | 19-21 | 96-121 | | after allowing 4 goals or more | 4-10 | -9.3 | 28-41 | -24.5 | 165-135 | +5.4 | 6-7 | 36-30 | 140-155 | | after a loss by 2 goals or more in their previous game | 6-6 | -2.7 | 31-31 | -6.6 | 160-112 | +36.3 | 5-6 | 30-27 | 118-134 | | after scoring 1 goal or less in their previous game | 8-2 | +5.9 | 21-21 | -3.8 | 138-112 | +15.2 | 5-5 | 21-18 | 100-133 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 2-3 | -0.8 | 13-14 | -3.4 | 39-40 | -4.8 | 1-4 | 10-13 | 41-32 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 20-10 | +4.8 | 55-47 | -13.7 | 282-209 | -11.9 | 13-16 | 46-48 | 199-263 | | when playing against a team with a losing record in the second half of the season | 3-4 | -2.4 | 22-23 | -9 | 144-102 | -5 | 2-5 | 20-23 | 99-131 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 24-33-0 | -18.3 | 24-33 | -18.3 | 21-30 | 2.4 | 31.0 | 2.6 | 29.7 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 11-15-0 | -4.2 | 11-15 | -4.2 | 10-14 | 2.3 | 28.9 | 2.5 | 30.8 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4-0 | -4 | 1-4 | -4 | 0-3 | 2.0 | 38.4 | 2.6 | 29.4 | | vs. Division | 9-7-0 | -0.2 | 9-7 | -0.2 | 7-7 | 2.6 | 32.6 | 2.2 | 28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 57 | 138 | 40 | 49 | 41 | 8 | 9 | 1765 | 7.8% | 194 | 35 | 18.0% | 239 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 26 | 59 | 16 | 22 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 751 | 7.9% | 74 | 9 | 12.2% | 99 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 192 | 5.2% | 25 | 6 | 24.0% | 16 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 16 | 42 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 522 | 8.0% | 56 | 12 | 21.4% | 69 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 146 | 37 | 54 | 44 | 11 | 16 | 1691 | 8.6% | 203 | 27 | 13.3% | 236 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 65 | 18 | 29 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 802 | 8.1% | 90 | 13 | 14.4% | 114 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 13 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 147 | 8.8% | 16 | 3 | 18.7% | 16 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 35 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 451 | 7.8% | 50 | 6 | 12.0% | 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
| TUUKKA RASK (All Games) | 26 | 24 | 689 | 640 | 92.9% | 3 | 11-13 | -6 | 11-13-0 | -7 | 11-10 | | TUUKKA RASK (Road Games) | 12 | 10 | 328 | 306 | 93.3% | 1 | 5-5 | +0.3 | 5-5-0 | +1 | 4-5 | | TUUKKA RASK (vs. Division) | 10 | 9 | 261 | 246 | 94.3% | 1 | 5-4 | +0.2 | 5-4-0 | -1 | 4-4 | | TUUKKA RASK (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 115 | 109 | 94.8% | 0 | 1-3 | -2.7 | 1-3-0 | -3 | 0-2 | | TIM THOMAS (All Games) | 34 | 33 | 975 | 894 | 91.7% | 3 | 13-20 | -12.4 | 13-20-0 | -12 | 10-20 | | TIM THOMAS (Road Games) | 16 | 16 | 474 | 434 | 91.6% | 2 | 6-10 | -4.5 | 6-10-0 | -4 | 6-9 | | TIM THOMAS (vs. Division) | 8 | 7 | 190 | 172 | 90.5% | 0 | 4-3 | -0.4 | 4-3-0 | -1 | 3-3 | | TIM THOMAS (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 92 | 81 | 88.0% | 0 | 0-4 | -4.9 | 0-4-0 | -4 | 1-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 32-25-0 | -0.2 | 32-25 | -0.2 | 25-30 | 2.8 | 31.3 | 2.5 | 31.6 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 18-12-0 | -1.1 | 18-12 | -1.1 | 13-15 | 2.9 | 30.9 | 2.3 | 32.2 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4-0 | -4.6 | 1-4 | -4.6 | 3-2 | 2.2 | 30.4 | 3.6 | 30.4 | | vs. Division | 9-7-0 | -0.7 | 9-7 | -0.7 | 6-9 | 2.6 | 29.7 | 2.2 | 32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 57 | 158 | 42 | 54 | 55 | 7 | 5 | 1783 | 8.9% | 231 | 41 | 17.7% | 283 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 30 | 86 | 24 | 29 | 29 | 4 | 4 | 928 | 9.3% | 123 | 26 | 21.1% | 147 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 152 | 7.2% | 23 | 3 | 13.0% | 22 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 16 | 41 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 476 | 8.6% | 63 | 11 | 17.5% | 76 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 144 | 42 | 49 | 46 | 6 | 9 | 1800 | 8.0% | 200 | 26 | 13.0% | 235 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 70 | 20 | 22 | 23 | 4 | 6 | 965 | 7.3% | 104 | 9 | 8.7% | 115 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 18 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 152 | 11.8% | 19 | 3 | 15.8% | 30 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 36 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 521 | 6.9% | 50 | 5 | 10.0% | 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
| JHONAS ENROTH (All Games) | 1 | 1 | 37 | 33 | 89.2% | 0 | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1-0 | -1 | 1-0 | | JHONAS ENROTH (vs. Division) | 1 | 1 | 37 | 33 | 89.2% | 0 | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1-0 | -1 | 1-0 | | PATRICK LALIME (All Games) | 10 | 8 | 259 | 232 | 89.6% | 1 | 3-5 | -3.1 | 3-5-0 | -4 | 4-3 | | PATRICK LALIME (Home Games) | 5 | 5 | 148 | 139 | 93.9% | 0 | 2-3 | -2.1 | 2-3-0 | -3 | 2-2 | | PATRICK LALIME (vs. Division) | 1 | 1 | 26 | 21 | 80.8% | 0 | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1-0 | -1 | 1-0 | | PATRICK LALIME (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 3 | 93 | 82 | 88.2% | 1 | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-2-0 | -2 | 2-1 | | RYAN MILLER (All Games) | 49 | 48 | 1500 | 1396 | 93.1% | 4 | 29-19 | +3.9 | 29-19-0 | +6 | 20-27 | | RYAN MILLER (Home Games) | 26 | 25 | 814 | 759 | 93.2% | 2 | 16-9 | +1 | 16-9-0 | +2 | 11-13 | | RYAN MILLER (vs. Division) | 14 | 14 | 457 | 432 | 94.5% | 1 | 9-5 | +1.3 | 9-5-0 | +2 | 4-9 | | RYAN MILLER (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 126 | 113 | 89.7% | 0 | 1-3 | -3.6 | 1-3-0 | -3 | 3-1 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON 3.13, BUFFALO 3.06 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 1/13/2010 | at ANAHEIM | 3-4 | L | 0, +120 | L | 5 ov | O | | 1/14/2010 | at SAN JOSE | 2-1 | W | 0, +185 | W | 5 ov | U | | 1/16/2010 | at LOS ANGELES | 3-4 | L | 0, +140 | L | 5 ov | O | | 1/18/2010 | OTTAWA | 1-5 | L | 0, -155 | L | 5 ov | O | | 1/21/2010 | COLUMBUS | 2-3 | L | 0, -175 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/23/2010 | OTTAWA | 1-2 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5 ov | U | | 1/24/2010 | at CAROLINA | 1-5 | L | 0, -120 | L | 5 ov | O | | 1/29/2010 | at BUFFALO | 1-2 | L | 0, +130 | L | 5 ov | U | | 1/30/2010 | LOS ANGELES | 2-3 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/2/2010 | WASHINGTON | 1-4 | L | 0, +110 | L | 6 un | U | | 2/4/2010 | MONTREAL | 2-3 | L | 0, -165 | L | 5 ov | P | | 2/6/2010 | VANCOUVER | 2-3 | L | 0, -105 | L | 5 ov | P | | 2/7/2010 | at MONTREAL | 3-0 | W | 0, -115 | W | 5 ov | U | | 2/9/2010 | at BUFFALO | | | 2/11/2010 | at TAMPA BAY | | | 2/13/2010 | at FLORIDA | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/14/2010 | at ATLANTA | 2-1 | W | 0, -135 | W | 6 un | U | | 1/16/2010 | at NY ISLANDERS | 2-3 | L | 0, -130 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/18/2010 | at PHOENIX | 7-2 | W | 0, -105 | W | 5 ov | O | | 1/19/2010 | at ANAHEIM | 4-5 | L | 0, +105 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/21/2010 | at LOS ANGELES | 3-4 | L | 0, -105 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/23/2010 | at SAN JOSE | 2-5 | L | 0, +140 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/25/2010 | at VANCOUVER | 2-3 | L | 0, +115 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/27/2010 | NEW JERSEY | 2-1 | W | 0, -130 | W | 5 ov | U | | 1/29/2010 | BOSTON | 2-1 | W | 0, -150 | W | 5 ov | U | | 2/1/2010 | at PITTSBURGH | 4-5 | L | 0, +120 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/3/2010 | OTTAWA | 2-4 | L | 0, -140 | L | 5 ov | O | | 2/5/2010 | CAROLINA | 3-4 | L | 0, -215 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/6/2010 | at COLUMBUS | 0-4 | L | 0, +110 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/9/2010 | BOSTON | | | 2/11/2010 | at CAROLINA | | | 2/13/2010 | SAN JOSE | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| BUFFALO is 47-33 (+6.8 Units) against the spread versus BOSTON since 1996 | | BUFFALO is 45-32-4 straight up against BOSTON since 1996 | | 42 of 76 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+3.7 Units) |
| |
| BUFFALO is 9-8-0 straight up against BOSTON over the last 3 seasons | | 11 of 17 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+4.3 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| BUFFALO is 27-14 (+5.4 Units) against the spread versus BOSTON since 1996 | | BUFFALO is 27-13-1 straight up against BOSTON since 1996 | | 19 of 39 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=-2.6 Units, Under=-1.3 Units) |
| |
| BUFFALO is 6-3 (+0.8 Units) against the spread versus BOSTON over the last 3 seasons | | BUFFALO is 6-3-0 straight up against BOSTON over the last 3 seasons | | 8 of 9 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+7.2 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/29/2010 | BOSTON | 1 | 0, +130 | | Under | 31 | 2 | 1-0 | RASK | 23 | 21 | | | BUFFALO | 2 | 0, -150 | 5 ov | SU ATS | 23 | 4 | 4-1 | MILLER | 31 | 30 | | 11/20/2009 | BOSTON | 2 | 0, +150 | | SU ATS | 26 | 4 | 4-0 | RASK | 26 | 25 | | | BUFFALO | 1 | 0, -170 | 5.5 un | Under | 26 | 2 | 2-1 | MILLER | 26 | 24 | | 11/7/2009 | BUFFALO | 2 | 0, +125 | | Over | 30 | 4 | 7-0 | ENROTH | 37 | 33 | | | BOSTON | 4 | 0, -145 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 37 | 7 | 4-2 | RASK | 30 | 28 | | 4/11/2009 | BOSTON | 1 | 0, +105 | | Over | 35 | 2 | 4-1 | FERNANDEZ | 34 | 28 | | | BUFFALO | 6 | 0, -125 | 5.5 ev | SU ATS | 34 | 10 | 3-1 | TELLQVIST | 35 | 34 | | 1/3/2009 | BUFFALO | 4 | 0, +190 | | SU ATS | 25 | 8 | 3-1 | MILLER | 31 | 29 | | | BOSTON | 2 | 0, -230 | 5.5 ov | Over | 31 | 4 | 5-1 | THOMAS | 25 | 21 | | 11/26/2008 | BOSTON | 2 | 0, -105 | | Under | 29 | 4 | 2-0 | THOMAS | 23 | 20 | | | BUFFALO | 3 | 0, -115 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 23 | 2 | 2-0 | MILLER | 29 | 27 | | 11/19/2008 | BUFFALO | 4 | 0, +115 | | Over | 29 | 8 | 6-1 | MILLER | 20 | 13 | | | BOSTON | 7 | 0, -135 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 23 | 13 | 3-2 | FERNANDEZ | 29 | 25 | | 11/8/2008 | BUFFALO | 1 | 0, +115 | | Under | 33 | 2 | 2-0 | MILLER | 40 | 37 | | | BOSTON | 3 | 0, -135 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 40 | 4 | 3-0 | FERNANDEZ | 33 | 32 | | 10/21/2008 | BOSTON | 2 | 0, +160 | | Under | 32 | 2 | 6-1 | FERNANDEZ | 30 | 28 | | | BUFFALO | 3 | 0, -180 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 30 | 4 | 4-1 | MILLER | 32 | 30 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| [D] 01/06/2010 - Andrew Ference expected to miss 6 weeks ( Groin ) | | [D] 02/01/2010 - Mark Stuart out indefinitely ( Finger ) | | [D] 02/07/2010 - Johnny Boychuk expected to miss 7-10 days ( Eye ) | | [C] 02/09/2010 - David Krejci probable Tuesday vs. Buffalo ( Leg ) | |
| [RW] 02/06/2010 - Patrick Kaleta out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [D] 02/08/2010 - Steve Montador doubtful Tuesday vs. Boston ( Hip ) |
|
|