|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| DETROIT | HOWARD | 3.2 | 0, -128 | | | ST LOUIS | CONKLIN | 2.7 | 0, +128 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 27-31 | -14.4 | 163-104 | -15.6 | 701-484 | -37.6 | 21-34 | 116-124 | 547-557 | | in a road game where where the total is 5.5 | 10-13 | -3.2 | 41-41 | -11.4 | 157-141 | -30.6 | 10-13 | 39-43 | 152-162 | | in February games | 1-2 | -0.4 | 15-16 | -12.2 | 82-48 | +10.6 | 2-1 | 16-11 | 72-54 | | second half of the season | 7-11 | -5.1 | 90-61 | -16.1 | 404-285 | -36.1 | 8-9 | 64-69 | 313-321 | | on Tuesday nights | 3-5 | -3 | 22-16 | -2.4 | 75-78 | -39.3 | 5-3 | 15-21 | 68-75 | | when playing with 2 days rest | 5-8 | -6.4 | 38-28 | -15.5 | 148-110 | -21.5 | 6-7 | 30-31 | 122-113 | | vs. division opponents | 6-8 | -4.1 | 49-36 | -15.5 | 206-142 | -23.9 | 6-8 | 37-39 | 165-165 | | revenging a home loss versus opponent | 3-9 | -9 | 21-21 | -8.3 | 36-30 | -4.3 | 5-6 | 20-16 | 33-23 | | revenging a loss versus opponent | 9-14 | -9.8 | 55-40 | -15.5 | 93-57 | -5.4 | 7-14 | 41-42 | 62-68 | | after allowing 4 goals or more | 8-8 | -2.5 | 42-26 | +0.6 | 146-108 | -14.2 | 7-9 | 31-31 | 128-113 | | after playing 3 consecutive road games | 4-3 | +0.4 | 12-16 | -17.2 | 63-62 | -33.4 | 3-4 | 12-12 | 58-60 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 9-12 | -8.2 | 69-43 | -18.7 | 296-212 | -65 | 6-14 | 55-47 | 253-220 | | when playing against a team with a losing record in the second half of the season | 2-4 | -2.8 | 33-26 | -23.2 | 144-104 | -44.3 | 3-3 | 29-24 | 125-108 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 25-34 | -9.3 | 99-128 | -20.5 | 537-546 | -23.2 | 25-30 | 103-103 | 494-515 | | in a home game where where the total is 5.5 | 4-17 | -18.6 | 29-38 | -18.6 | 114-110 | -23.6 | 8-13 | 32-35 | 109-127 | | in February games | 1-3 | -0.9 | 14-19 | -4.1 | 69-67 | +2.6 | 2-2 | 13-19 | 59-68 | | second half of the season | 8-11 | -2 | 49-64 | -6.8 | 306-310 | -10 | 8-10 | 50-53 | 276-295 | | on Tuesday nights | 3-2 | +0.8 | 17-18 | -0.9 | 82-91 | -15.7 | 3-1 | 18-14 | 86-78 | | when playing on back-to-back days | 3-9 | -6.2 | 19-28 | -4.2 | 81-115 | -33.8 | 6-6 | 26-18 | 97-90 | | vs. division opponents | 6-9 | -1.8 | 35-36 | +8.5 | 150-171 | -19.2 | 7-8 | 34-31 | 140-157 | | after allowing 4 goals or more | 10-10 | +1.8 | 31-46 | -9.3 | 146-178 | -28.6 | 10-10 | 46-27 | 159-144 | | after a loss by 2 goals or more in their previous game | 10-8 | +2.1 | 31-35 | -1 | 134-156 | -19 | 7-10 | 38-23 | 142-135 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 3-6 | -2.4 | 15-25 | -5.9 | 46-76 | -21.7 | 5-4 | 21-12 | 52-62 | | when playing against a team with a losing record | 11-14 | -5.8 | 41-48 | -15.1 | 258-224 | -11.9 | 14-10 | 52-33 | 226-225 | | when playing against a team with a losing record in the second half of the season | 4-4 | -0.9 | 23-21 | +0.2 | 130-109 | -9.2 | 4-3 | 25-16 | 114-103 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 27-31-0 | -14.4 | 27-31 | -14.4 | 21-34 | 2.6 | 32.7 | 2.7 | 30.2 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 12-20-0 | -11.2 | 12-20 | -11.2 | 14-16 | 2.6 | 32.4 | 3.1 | 30.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3-0 | -0.4 | 2-3 | -0.4 | 3-2 | 2.6 | 32.0 | 2.6 | 37.2 | | vs. Division | 6-8-0 | -4.1 | 6-8 | -4.1 | 6-8 | 2.5 | 32.0 | 2.5 | 32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 58 | 150 | 44 | 45 | 55 | 6 | 11 | 1894 | 7.9% | 222 | 40 | 18.0% | 248 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 32 | 84 | 26 | 25 | 29 | 4 | 6 | 1038 | 8.1% | 113 | 18 | 15.9% | 134 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 160 | 8.1% | 22 | 5 | 22.7% | 25 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 14 | 35 | 10 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 448 | 7.8% | 54 | 11 | 20.4% | 58 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 156 | 45 | 52 | 49 | 10 | 8 | 1751 | 8.9% | 199 | 36 | 18.1% | 264 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 99 | 30 | 35 | 28 | 6 | 6 | 978 | 10.1% | 102 | 22 | 21.6% | 164 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 13 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 186 | 7.0% | 15 | 0 | 0.0% | 21 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 35 | 11 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 448 | 7.8% | 52 | 11 | 21.2% | 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
| JIMMY HOWARD (All Games) | 40 | 39 | 1225 | 1134 | 92.6% | 2 | 20-19 | -5 | 20-19-0 | -8 | 15-22 | | JIMMY HOWARD (Road Games) | 22 | 21 | 665 | 614 | 92.3% | 1 | 10-11 | -2.4 | 10-11-0 | -3 | 10-10 | | JIMMY HOWARD (vs. Division) | 9 | 9 | 296 | 276 | 93.2% | 1 | 4-5 | -2.5 | 4-5-0 | -3 | 5-4 | | JIMMY HOWARD (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 138 | 128 | 92.8% | 0 | 1-3 | -1.4 | 1-3-0 | -1 | 2-2 | | CHRIS OSGOOD (All Games) | 21 | 19 | 524 | 467 | 89.1% | 2 | 7-12 | -9.4 | 7-12-0 | -9 | 6-12 | | CHRIS OSGOOD (Road Games) | 13 | 11 | 311 | 269 | 86.5% | 1 | 2-9 | -8.8 | 2-9-0 | -9 | 4-6 | | CHRIS OSGOOD (vs. Division) | 5 | 5 | 152 | 138 | 90.8% | 1 | 2-3 | -1.6 | 2-3-0 | -2 | 1-4 | | CHRIS OSGOOD (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 3 | 94 | 80 | 85.1% | 1 | 0-3 | -3.2 | 0-3-0 | -3 | 1-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 25-34-0 | -9.2 | 25-34 | -9.2 | 25-30 | 2.6 | 28.7 | 2.8 | 30.2 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 8-21-0 | -20.2 | 8-21 | -20.2 | 12-14 | 2.3 | 29.8 | 3.1 | 27.3 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4-0 | -2.6 | 1-4 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 2.0 | 30.4 | 3.2 | 29.4 | | vs. Division | 6-9-0 | -1.8 | 6-9 | -1.8 | 7-8 | 2.5 | 27.8 | 2.9 | 32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 59 | 151 | 50 | 47 | 48 | 6 | 8 | 1696 | 8.9% | 214 | 35 | 16.4% | 254 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 29 | 67 | 28 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 864 | 7.8% | 116 | 15 | 12.9% | 121 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 152 | 6.6% | 22 | 5 | 22.7% | 17 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 15 | 37 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 417 | 8.9% | 60 | 13 | 21.7% | 64 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 166 | 48 | 47 | 62 | 9 | 12 | 1781 | 9.3% | 241 | 36 | 14.9% | 277 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 89 | 22 | 29 | 33 | 5 | 7 | 792 | 11.2% | 114 | 17 | 14.9% | 147 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 16 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 147 | 10.9% | 21 | 3 | 14.3% | 31 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 44 | 18 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 485 | 9.1% | 67 | 9 | 13.4% | 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
| TY CONKLIN (All Games) | 19 | 18 | 595 | 548 | 92.1% | 1 | 8-10 | +0.4 | 8-10-0 | +1 | 8-10 | | TY CONKLIN (Home Games) | 6 | 6 | 186 | 160 | 86.0% | 0 | 0-6 | -7.4 | 0-6-0 | -6 | 4-2 | | TY CONKLIN (vs. Division) | 4 | 4 | 143 | 131 | 91.6% | 1 | 2-2 | +1 | 2-2-0 | +1 | 2-2 | | TY CONKLIN (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 117 | 110 | 94.0% | 0 | 1-3 | -1.6 | 1-3-0 | -2 | 2-2 | | CHRIS MASON (All Games) | 40 | 39 | 1140 | 1036 | 90.9% | 0 | 16-23 | -9 | 16-23-0 | -9 | 17-18 | | CHRIS MASON (Home Games) | 21 | 21 | 563 | 510 | 90.6% | 0 | 7-14 | -12.2 | 7-14-0 | -11 | 8-10 | | CHRIS MASON (vs. Division) | 10 | 10 | 320 | 295 | 92.2% | 0 | 4-6 | -1.1 | 4-6-0 | -1 | 5-5 | | CHRIS MASON (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 3 | 104 | 94 | 90.4% | 0 | 2-1 | +2.1 | 2-1-0 | +2 | 0-3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DETROIT 3.25, ST LOUIS 3.21 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 1/14/2010 | CAROLINA | 3-1 | W | 0, -250 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/16/2010 | at DALLAS | 2-3 | L | 0, -115 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/17/2010 | CHICAGO | 3-4 | L | 0, +110 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/19/2010 | at WASHINGTON | 2-3 | L | 0, +150 | L | 6 un | U | | 1/21/2010 | at MINNESOTA | 4-3 | W | 0, -120 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/23/2010 | LOS ANGELES | 2-3 | L | 0, -155 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/26/2010 | PHOENIX | 4-5 | L | 0, -180 | L | 5 ov | O | | 1/27/2010 | at MINNESOTA | 2-5 | L | 0, -115 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/29/2010 | NASHVILLE | 4-2 | W | 0, -160 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/31/2010 | at PITTSBURGH | 1-2 | L | 0, +135 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/2/2010 | at SAN JOSE | 4-2 | W | 0, +165 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 2/3/2010 | at ANAHEIM | 1-3 | L | 0, +110 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/6/2010 | at LOS ANGELES | 3-4 | L | 0, +105 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/9/2010 | at ST LOUIS | | | 2/11/2010 | SAN JOSE | | | 2/13/2010 | OTTAWA | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/14/2010 | MINNESOTA | 1-0 | W | 0, -155 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/16/2010 | NY RANGERS | 4-1 | W | 0, -130 | W | 5 ov | P | | 1/18/2010 | at COLUMBUS | 2-4 | L | 0, +105 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/20/2010 | at MONTREAL | 4-3 | W | 0, +110 | W | 5.5 un | O | | 1/21/2010 | at OTTAWA | 2-3 | L | 0, +140 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/23/2010 | ANAHEIM | 3-4 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 1/25/2010 | at CALGARY | 2-0 | W | 0, +145 | W | 5 ov | U | | 1/27/2010 | at VANCOUVER | 2-3 | L | 0, +175 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 1/28/2010 | at EDMONTON | 2-1 | W | 0, -130 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 1/30/2010 | COLUMBUS | 2-3 | L | 0, -165 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/3/2010 | at CHICAGO | 3-2 | W | 0, +210 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 2/4/2010 | SAN JOSE | 2-4 | L | 0, +120 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/6/2010 | CHICAGO | 1-2 | L | 0, +125 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 2/8/2010 | at COLORADO | 2-5 | L | 0, +115 | L | 5.5 un | O | | 2/9/2010 | DETROIT | | | 2/12/2010 | TORONTO | | | 2/13/2010 | WASHINGTON | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| DETROIT is 56-29-10 straight up against ST LOUIS since 1996 | | 44 of 85 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=+0.8 Units) |
| |
| ST LOUIS is 8-10 (+3.9 Units) against the spread versus DETROIT over the last 3 seasons | | DETROIT is 10-8-0 straight up against ST LOUIS over the last 3 seasons | | 9 of 15 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=+2.6 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| DETROIT is 27-13 (+9.1 Units) against the spread versus ST LOUIS since 1996 | | DETROIT is 26-13-6 straight up against ST LOUIS since 1996 | | 20 of 38 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+0.3 Units) |
| |
| DETROIT is 6-2 (+2.9 Units) against the spread versus ST LOUIS over the last 3 seasons | | DETROIT is 6-2-0 straight up against ST LOUIS over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 6 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Over=+1.6 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12/9/2009 | ST LOUIS | 1 | 0, +145 | | SU ATS | 26 | 2 | 4-0 | CONKLIN | 42 | 42 | | | DETROIT | 0 | 0, -165 | 5.5 un | Under | 42 | 0 | 6-0 | HOWARD | 26 | 25 | | 11/28/2009 | DETROIT | 4 | 0, -110 | | SU ATS | 36 | 6 | 1-1 | HOWARD | 35 | 32 | | | ST LOUIS | 3 | 0, -110 | 5.5 un | Over | 35 | 6 | 2-0 | | 36 | 33 | | 10/3/2009 | ST LOUIS | 5 | 0, +155 | | SU ATS | 32 | 10 | 5-3 | CONKLIN | 33 | 30 | | N | DETROIT | 3 | 0, -175 | 5.5 ev | Over | 33 | 6 | 5-1 | HOWARD | 32 | 27 | | 10/2/2009 | DETROIT | 3 | 0, -170 | | Over | 34 | 4 | 4-1 | OSGOOD | 23 | 19 | | N | ST LOUIS | 4 | 0, +150 | 5.5 ev | SU ATS | 23 | 6 | 4-1 | MASON | 34 | 31 | | 4/2/2009 | ST LOUIS | 5 | 0, +240 | | SU ATS | 33 | 9 | 4-1 | MASON | 38 | 34 | | | DETROIT | 4 | 0, -275 | 5.5 ov | Over | 38 | 7 | 5-1 | CONKLIN | 33 | 28 | | 3/14/2009 | DETROIT | 5 | 0, -150 | | SU ATS | 27 | 5 | 4-0 | OSGOOD | 32 | 30 | | | ST LOUIS | 2 | 0, +130 | 5.5 ov | Over | 32 | 4 | 4-0 | MASON | 23 | 19 | | 3/3/2009 | DETROIT | 5 | 0, -170 | | SU ATS | 36 | 9 | 7-3 | OSGOOD | 22 | 22 | | | ST LOUIS | 0 | 0, +150 | 5.5 un | Under | 22 | 0 | 3-0 | MASON | 36 | 31 | | 2/2/2009 | ST LOUIS | 3 | 0, +255 | | Over | 33 | 6 | 7-3 | MASON | 13 | 13 | | | DETROIT | 4 | 0, -305 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 21 | 6 | 3-0 | OSGOOD | 33 | 30 | | 12/23/2008 | ST LOUIS | 1 | 0, +280 | | Under | 34 | 0 | 6-0 | LEGACE | 41 | 37 | | | DETROIT | 4 | 0, -370 | 6.5 un | SU ATS | 41 | 6 | 7-2 | CONKLIN | 34 | 33 | | 10/22/2008 | DETROIT | 4 | 0, -145 | | SU ATS | 34 | 6 | 3-2 | CONKLIN | 24 | 21 | | | ST LOUIS | 3 | 0, +125 | 5.5 ev | Over | 24 | 5 | 5-2 | LEGACE | 34 | 30 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| [D] 02/03/2010 - Andreas Lilja expected to miss 3-4 weeks ( Concussion ) | | [RW] 02/01/2010 - Johan Franzen is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs. St. Louis ( Knee ) | | [D] 02/08/2010 - Niklas Kronwall is downgraded to expected to miss Tuesday vs. St. Louis ( Knee ) | | [RW] 02/07/2010 - Patrick Eaves injured last game, doubtful Tuesday vs St louis ( Ankle ) | | [LW] 02/08/2010 - Tomas Holmstrom "?" Tuesday vs. St. Louis ( Knee ) | | [LW] 02/08/2010 - Drew Miller probable Tuesday vs. St. Louis ( Ankle ) | |
| [F] 02/04/2010 - B.J. Crombeen "?" Saturday vs Chicago ( Lower Body ) |
|
|